Are Some Senate Democrats Too Likable to Vote Out?

Republicans are hoping to make races a referendum on policy, not personality.

Warner: "Look at Simpson-Bowles."
National Journal
Alex Roarty
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Alex Roarty
March 24, 2014, 1 a.m.

Re­pub­lic­ans are count­ing on a fa­vor­able en­vir­on­ment and tar­get-rich map to carry them to a Sen­ate ma­jor­ity in 2015. But stand­ing between them and vic­tory are a slew of Demo­crat­ic in­cum­bents who, while vul­ner­able, have one im­port­ant ad­vant­age: People like them.

There’s no bet­ter ex­ample than in New Hamp­shire, home to one of the coun­try’s most eagerly an­ti­cip­ated races after Scott Brown made a de facto cam­paign de­clar­a­tion earli­er this month against Demo­crat­ic Sen. Jeanne Shaheen. The former GOP sen­at­or from Mas­sachu­setts is a strong can­did­ate in his own right, well-known and cap­able of rais­ing mil­lions of dol­lars. But his op­pon­ent is no or­din­ary in­cum­bent: She’s a former six-year gov­ernor whose ten­ure stretches back dec­ades in a small state where voters get to know their elec­ted of­fi­cials well.

And she has the poll num­bers to back it up: Des­pite her vote for Pres­id­ent Obama’s deeply un­pop­u­lar health care law, half of New Hamp­shire’s adults re­gard Shaheen pos­it­ively, ac­cord­ing to a WMUR Gran­ite State poll from Janu­ary. (Only 34 per­cent viewed her un­fa­vor­ably.) In oth­er words, she’s in a far dif­fer­ent place polit­ic­ally than the last Demo­crat­ic wo­man Brown took down to earn a place in the Sen­ate.

“He’s go­ing to find she’s no Martha Coakley,” said Tom Rath, a former New Hamp­shire Re­pub­lic­an at­tor­ney gen­er­al. “This is a per­son people in this state know really well and are very com­fort­able with.”

Re­pub­lic­ans should be en­cour­aged that chal­lengers like Brown have signed up to take on Demo­crat­ic law­makers des­pite their pop­ular­ity — an in­dic­a­tion that they think a na­tion­al mood sour on Demo­crats will trump the daunt­ing pro­spect of tak­ing on well-en­trenched in­cum­bents. But GOP strategists warn that these chal­lengers face a more com­plic­ated path to vic­tory, one that will force them to care­fully cal­ib­rate a strategy that can sim­ul­tan­eously cri­tique their op­pon­ents but do so without re­ly­ing on an as­sault on the Demo­crats’ char­ac­ter.

“You can ar­gue wheth­er she’s too close to the pres­id­ent or Harry Re­id, but there’s no ques­tion the people have known her, known her fam­ily, for 30 years,” Rath said. “It’s go­ing to be hard to make her in­to a per­son who’s not likable.”

Re­pub­lic­ans face a sim­il­ar obstacle in Vir­gin­ia where Sen. Mark Warner, a former gov­ernor, awaits. Sen. Mark Ud­all, whose fam­ily name is le­gendary in Demo­crat­ic circles, is up for reelec­tion in Col­or­ado. Both have the type of repu­ta­tion that makes them more than just a gen­er­ic mem­ber of their party. Warner has long in­cul­cated a repu­ta­tion as a cent­rist, and polls have re­por­ted his ap­prov­al rat­ing north of 60 per­cent.

Ud­all isn’t as well-liked, but more voters than not have a fa­vor­able im­age of him as he be­gins his reelec­tion cam­paign. A sur­vey from the Demo­crat­ic firm Hick­man As­so­ci­ates In­ter­na­tion­al, con­duc­ted on be­half of the Con­sumer En­ergy Al­li­ance (a group that sup­ports build­ing the Key­stone XL pipeline), found that 47 per­cent of state res­id­ents saw him very or some­what un­fa­vor­ably; only 26 per­cent viewed him un­fa­vor­ably.

Those are the kind of num­bers Demo­crat­ic op­er­at­ives say they can use to make the con­tests a loc­al match­up of per­son­al­it­ies, not just in the troika of blue states but pos­sibly with Mark Pry­or in Arkan­sas and Mary Landrieu in Louisi­ana. Shaheen, for in­stance, can talk about fund­ing she de­livered for a loc­al fire­house while Re­pub­lic­ans talk breath­lessly about the pres­id­ent and Re­id.

It’s a strategy they ar­gue worked well in 2012, when Re­pub­lic­ans tried and failed to make an ar­ray of Sen­ate races a na­tion­al ref­er­en­dum.

“Re­pub­lic­ans’ only hope is to make these races about something else oth­er than the names on the bal­lot,” said Justin Barasky, spokes­man for the Demo­crat­ic Sen­at­ori­al Cam­paign Com­mit­tee. “And it didn’t work for them last cycle.”

GOP op­er­at­ives in­volved in their races this year stress their can­did­ates know that cam­paign­ing against a pop­u­lar in­cum­bent like Warner is dif­fer­ent. It starts, they say, by un­der­stand­ing how they talk about him or her with voters has to be meas­ured, at least in the early go­ing.

“If some­body starts off with a per­son­al fa­vor­ab­il­ity rat­ing that might be high, if you start go­ing and say­ing they shouldn’t like them, you’re prob­ably go­ing to run in­to a brick wall,” said Dan Al­len, a Re­pub­lic­an op­er­at­ive based in Vir­gin­ia.

In­stead, Al­len urged Re­pub­lic­ans to keep their at­tacks fo­cused tightly on policy, es­pe­cially Obama­care. The cri­ti­cism isn’t ne­ces­sar­ily about per­suad­ing people then and there to vote against him, but rather part of a longer game to con­vince them that their long-held im­age of Warner as a cent­rist doesn’t match what he’s done in of­fice. At which point, voters will be more open-minded about oth­er ar­gu­ments against him.

It’s a play­book that Warner’s op­pon­ent, former chair­man of the Re­pub­lic­an Na­tion­al Com­mit­tee Ed Gillespie, ap­pears to be fol­low­ing. A Web video re­leased by his cam­paign com­pares and con­trasts the two can­did­ates’ stance on Obama­care while the law was de­bated in 2009, sug­gest­ing that Warner “broke his word” to his con­stitu­ents by vot­ing for it.

“Go­ing after likab­il­ity as your first punch, or your first ad­vance — that’s go­ing to turn more people off than you’re go­ing to get,” Al­len said. “The smart cam­paigns are the ones that look at it and say, ‘I’m not go­ing to make it per­son­al. I don’t need to. Let me use some of these things out there already.’ “

Not every­one frets that GOP can­did­ates need to tip­toe by their op­pon­ents. Op­er­at­ives at the Na­tion­al Re­pub­lic­an Sen­at­ori­al Com­mit­tee say their own in­tern­al polling on Shaheen, Warner, and Landrieu show at least a plur­al­ity of voters think a new per­son should take of­fice. In oth­er words: Voters are ready to throw the bums out.

Ed Beth­une, a former GOP House mem­ber from Arkan­sas who chal­lenged Mark Pyror’s fath­er, Dav­id, for his Sen­ate seat in 1984, says the eld­er Pry­or’s pop­ular­ity rendered his chal­lenge little more than a long shot — even dur­ing Ron­ald Re­agan’s land­slide reelec­tion win.

But that was 30 years ago, he adds, be­fore voters star­ted caring about party af­fil­i­ation and stopped caring about the per­son­al­it­ies be­hind them. Now voters know what they want in a politi­cian, and in Arkan­sas, it’s not a Demo­crat.

“I kid Dav­id Pry­or all the time, ‘Why don’t we re­run our race this year?’ ” Beth­une said.

What We're Following See More »
SANS PROOF
NRA Chief: Leftist Protesters Are Paid
2 days ago
UPDATE
NEW TRAVEL BAN COMING SOON
Trump Still on Campaign Rhetoric
2 days ago
UPDATE
“WE’RE CHANGING IT”
Trump Rails On Obamacare
2 days ago
UPDATE

After spending a few minutes re-litigating the Democratic primary, Donald Trump turned his focus to Obamacare. “I inherited a mess, believe me. We also inherited a failed healthcare law that threatens our medical system with absolute and total catastrophe” he said. “I’ve been watching and nobody says it, but Obamacare doesn’t work.” He finished, "so we're going to repeal and replace Obamacare."

FAKE NEWS
Trump Goes After The Media
2 days ago
UPDATE

Donald Trump lobbed his first attack at the “dishonest media” about a minute into his speech, saying that the media would not appropriately cover the standing ovation that he received. “We are fighting the fake news,” he said, before doubling down on his previous claim that the press is “the enemy of the people." However, he made a distinction, saying that he doesn't think all media is the enemy, just the "fake news."

FBI TURNED DOWN REQUEST
Report: Trump Asked FBI to Deny Russia Stories
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"The FBI rejected a recent White House request to publicly knock down media reports about communications between Donald Trump's associates and Russians known to US intelligence during the 2016 presidential campaign, multiple US officials briefed on the matter tell CNN. But a White House official said late Thursday that the request was only made after the FBI indicated to the White House it did not believe the reporting to be accurate."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login