Can Democrats’ Koch Attacks Work If Nobody Knows Who They Are?

New poll shows voters don’t know much about them, while a Democratic strategist criticizes DSCC strategy.

David Koch and co. don't want their name tied to the Keystone XL Pipeline.
National Journal
Scott Bland
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Scott Bland
March 25, 2014, 6:45 a.m.

After ab­sorb­ing mil­lions of dol­lars in out­side spend­ing from groups con­nec­ted to the Koch broth­ers, con­gres­sion­al Demo­crats have made the con­ser­vat­ive bil­lion­aires the star vil­lains in a mes­saging coun­ter­of­fens­ive. But a new non­par­tis­an poll high­lights a prob­lem with the plan: A ma­jor­ity of likely 2014 voters have nev­er even heard of the Kochs.

A 52 per­cent ma­jor­ity of re­spond­ents in the new George Wash­ing­ton Uni­versity Battle­ground Poll said they had nev­er heard of the Koch broth­ers, with an ad­di­tion­al 11 per­cent say­ing they had no opin­ion of the con­ser­vat­ive in­dus­tri­al­ists. Of the small slice who re­gistered an opin­ion of the Kochs, 12 per­cent viewed them fa­vor­ably and 25 per­cent viewed them un­fa­vor­ably. The sur­vey is one of the first to test opin­ions about the Kochs since they be­came a big sub­ject of polit­ic­al con­ver­sa­tion in the last few years.

From Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id’s floor speeches to his party’s fun­drais­ing emails to re­cent TV ads from Demo­crat­ic can­did­ates and out­side groups, Demo­crats have homed in on the Kochs re­cently. Amer­ic­ans for Prosper­ity, one of the groups af­fil­i­ated with the Kochs, has spent around $30 mil­lion on TV ads against Demo­crat­ic House and Sen­ate can­did­ates ahead of the 2014 elec­tions.

Sev­er­al re­cent Demo­crat­ic TV ads re­spon­ded dir­ectly to the Kochs. Demo­crat­ic Sen. Mark Be­gich’s first TV ad in Alaska blamed “the bil­lion­aire Koch broth­ers” for a series of false at­tacks against him and for shut­ting down an Alaska re­finery, while a new ad from the Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity PAC in Col­or­ado con­nec­ted GOP Rep. Cory Gard­ner to “in­sur­ance com­pan­ies and out-of-state bil­lion­aires” fund­ing at­tack ads against Sen. Mark Ud­all be­cause Gard­ner’s policies, the nar­rat­or said, would be bet­ter for in­sur­ance com­pan­ies.

Celinda Lake, a Demo­crat­ic poll­ster whose firm helped con­duct the poll, said at the Chris­ti­an Sci­ence Mon­it­or Break­fast on Wed­nes­day that what the Kochs rep­res­ent, not the men them­selves, is what will res­on­ate with voters.

“I think the mes­saging around how they are is the ef­fect­ive piece,” Lake said, not­ing that groups af­fil­i­ated with the Kochs have taken cri­ti­cism for us­ing out-of-state act­ors in Sen­ate TV ads and for “ag­gress­ively” ad­voc­at­ing So­cial Se­cur­ity privat­iz­a­tion. “When they at­tach that sub­stance to the [Re­pub­lic­an] can­did­ates and also talk about out­side money, it’s go­ing to be more ef­fect­ive.”

Ed Goe­as, the Re­pub­lic­an poll­ster in­volved with the sur­vey, said the hub­bub about the Kochs was more about fun­drais­ing and ril­ing up the Demo­crat­ic base than com­mu­nic­at­ing to the broad­er elect­or­ate.

“You al­ways want to have some red meat to feed your base,” Goe­as said, though he ad­ded that he wasn’t sure how ef­fect­ive it would be. Both parties have tried at­tack­ing the sources of out­side money in the past, and Goe­as dis­missed the res­ults. “I think try­ing to make the Koch broth­ers that red meat is go­ing to be about as ef­fect­ive as what we tried to do with George Sor­os,” he said.

It’s not only Re­pub­lic­ans who are dis­missive of the Koch strategy. Thomas Mills, a North Car­o­lina-based Demo­crat­ic strategist, con­curred in a column pub­lished Tues­day. Con­cerned about the one-note Demo­crat­ic mes­saging, Mills wrote that Demo­crats have “ceded the polit­ic­al agenda to the Koch Broth­ers and the Re­pub­lic­ans. They should be at­tack­ing GOP policies and can­did­ates, not GOP fun­ders.” Mills ar­gued that Thom Tillis, the lead­ing GOP chal­lenger against Demo­crat­ic Sen. Kay Hagan, has plenty of more po­tent vul­ner­ab­il­it­ies stem­ming from his ten­ure as state House speak­er.

“He’s just an­oth­er phony politi­cian. Ex­pose him, not the Kochs. He’s the one on the bal­lot,” Mills writes.

The George Wash­ing­ton Uni­versity Battle­ground Poll, con­duc­ted by the Tar­rance Group and Lake Re­search Part­ners, sur­veyed 1,000 likely voters from March 16 through March 20. The poll’s mar­gin of er­ror is plus or minus 3.1 per­cent­age points.

What We're Following See More »
CITES CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Lieberman Withdraws from Consideration for FBI Job
2 days ago
THE LATEST
MINIMUM 2 PERCENT GDP
Trump Tells NATO Countries To Pay Up
2 days ago
BREAKING
MANAFORT AND FLYNN
Russians Discussed Influencing Trump Through Aides
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Source:
BUT WHITE HOUSE MAY USE AGAINST HIM ANYWAY
Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Source:
BUSINESSES CAN’T PLEAD FIFTH
Senate Intel to Subpoena Two of Flynn’s Businesses
4 days ago
THE LATEST

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login