Why Obama and His NSA Defenders Changed Their Minds

It was a legislative deadline, not a religious conversion, that changed the president’s posture. If Congress doesn’t act, the data collection would end entirely.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers, R-Mich., with Rep. C.A. Dutch Ruppersberger, D-Md., the ranking member, left, speaks at a press conference about proposed changes to the National Security Agency’s program of sweeping up and storing vast amounts of data on Americans' phone calls, at the Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, March 25, 2014.
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite
Brendan Sasso
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Brendan Sasso
March 25, 2014, 5:31 p.m.

It was only months ago that Pres­id­ent Obama, with bi­par­tis­an back­ing from the heads of Con­gress’s In­tel­li­gence com­mit­tees, was in­sist­ing that the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency’s mass sur­veil­lance pro­gram was key to keep­ing Amer­ic­ans safe from the next ma­jor ter­ror­ist at­tack. They were also dis­miss­ing pri­vacy con­cerns, say­ing the pro­gram was per­fectly leg­al and in­sist­ing the ne­ces­sary safe­guards were already in place.

But now, Obama’s full-speed ahead has turned in­to a hasty re­treat: The pres­id­ent and the NSA’s top sup­port­ers in Con­gress are all push­ing pro­pos­als to end the NSA’s bulk col­lec­tion of phone re­cords. And civil-liber­ties groups — awash in their newly won clout — are de­clar­ing vic­tory. The ques­tion is no longer wheth­er to change the pro­gram, but how dra­mat­ic­ally to over­haul it.

So what changed?

It’s not that Obama and his Hill al­lies sud­denly saw the er­ror of their ways and be­came born-again pri­vacy ad­voc­ates. In­stead, with a crit­ic­al sec­tion of the Pat­ri­ot Act set to ex­pire next year, they real­ized they had no choice but to ne­go­ti­ate.

If Con­gress fails to reau­thor­ize that pro­vi­sion — Sec­tion 215 — by June 1, 2015, then the NSA’s col­lec­tion of U.S. re­cords would have to end en­tirely. And the grow­ing out­rage promp­ted by the Snowden leaks means that the NSA’s sup­port­ers would al­most cer­tainly lose an up-or-down vote on the pro­gram.

Rep. Adam Schiff, a Demo­crat­ic mem­ber of the House In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee, said that loom­ing sun­set is what forced law­makers to the bar­gain­ing table. “I think what has changed is the grow­ing real­iz­a­tion that the votes are simply not there for reau­thor­iz­a­tion,” he said in an in­ter­view. “I think that more than any­thing else, that is gal­van­iz­ing us in­to ac­tion.”

Obama and the House In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee lead­ers be­lieve their pro­pos­als are now the NSA’s best bet to re­tain some power to mine U.S. phone re­cords for pos­sible ter­ror plots. Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee Chair­wo­man Di­anne Fein­stein, an­oth­er lead­ing NSA de­fend­er, also in­dic­ated she is on board with the changes, say­ing the pres­id­ent’s pro­pos­al is a “worthy ef­fort.”

And though the Hill’s NSA al­lies are now pro­pos­ing re­forms to the agency, they don’t seem par­tic­u­larly ex­cited about it.

At a Cap­it­ol Hill press con­fer­ence Tues­day, Rep. Mike Ro­gers, the Re­pub­lic­an chair­man of the House In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee, and Rep. Dutch Rup­pers­ber­ger, the pan­el’s top Demo­crat, of­ten soun­ded like they were ar­guing against their own bill that they were un­veil­ing.

“I pas­sion­ately be­lieve this pro­gram has saved Amer­ic­an lives,” Ro­gers said. Rup­pers­ber­ger said if the pro­gram had been in place in 2001, it may have pre­ven­ted the Sept. 11 at­tacks.

Ro­gers re­jec­ted a re­port­er’s sug­ges­tion that the NSA should have nev­er had con­trol of the massive data­base of phone re­cords in the first place. “There was no ab­use, no il­leg­al­ity, no un­con­sti­tu­tion­al­ity,” he said.

But the law­makers ac­know­ledged there is broad “dis­com­fort” with the pro­gram as it is cur­rently struc­tured. “We need to do something about bulk col­lec­tion be­cause of the per­cep­tion of our con­stitu­ents,” Rup­pers­ber­ger ad­mit­ted.

Un­der their le­gis­la­tion, the vast data­base of phone re­cords would stay in the hands of the phone com­pan­ies. The NSA could force the phone com­pan­ies to turn over par­tic­u­lar re­cords, and the For­eign In­tel­li­gence Sur­veil­lance Court would re­view the NSA or­ders after the fact.

Ro­gers and com­pany much prefer their ver­sion to a com­pet­ing pro­pos­al to change the way the gov­ern­ment gath­ers in­form­a­tion. That would be the USA Free­dom Act, a pro­pos­al from Sen­ate Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee Chair­man Patrick Leahy and Rep. Jim Sensen­bren­ner that Ro­gers and his ilk fear would go too far in ham­stringing the NSA. The USA Free­dom Act would re­quire the NSA to meet a tough­er stand­ard for the data searches and would lim­it oth­er NSA pro­grams, such as In­ter­net sur­veil­lance of people over­seas.

“In my opin­ion,” Rup­pers­ber­ger said, “the Sensen­bren­ner bill makes our coun­try less safe.”

What We're Following See More »
Congress Releases Stopgap Funding Bill
1 hours ago

"Congressional negotiators released a stopgap spending bill Tuesday night to avert a partial government shutdown at midnight Friday and to fund federal agencies and programs through April 28." The 70-page continuing resolution includes $170 million to aid Flint, Michigan's water supply, and a waiver that would allow Ret. Gen. James Mattis to assume the role of secretary of Defense.

Democrats Explore Electoral College Changes
1 hours ago

"A number of Capitol Hill Democrats have revived proposals to reform or abolish the Electoral College," chief among Michigan's John Conyers, who "held a panel on Capitol Hill Tuesday to discuss options for eliminating the Electoral College and replacing it with a system where a national popular vote elects the president. ... The plan with the most support to reform the election college at the panel was the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, a proposal first developed in 2001 that would give the national popular vote winner the majority of electoral college votes through an agreement between the states."

Jordan Can’t Force a Floor Vote on Impeaching Koskinen
15 hours ago
House Freedom Caucus Chairman Jim Jordan attempted to force a floor vote on impeaching IRS Commissioner John Koskinen, but "the House voted overwhelmingly to refer it to the Judiciary Committee. ... The committee will not be required to take up the resolution." Earlier, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi "made a motion to table the resolution, which the House voted against by a 180-235 margin, mostly along party lines."
Ryan: No Committee Assignments Until New Year
20 hours ago

House Speaker Paul Ryan has decreed that House members "won’t receive their committee assignments until January — after they cast a public vote on the House floor for speaker. "The move has sparked behind-the-scenes grumbling from a handful of Ryan critics, who say the delay allows him and the Speaker-aligned Steering Committee to dole out committee assignments based on political loyalty rather than merit or expertise." The roll call to elect the speaker is set for Jan. 3, the first vote of the new Congress.

Funding Bill To Be Released Tuesday
1 days ago

House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy told reporters on Monday that the government funding bill will be released on Tuesday. The bill is the last piece of legislation Congress needs to pass before leaving for the year and is expected to fund the government through the spring. The exact time date the bill would fund the government through is unclear, though it is expected to be in April or May.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.