GOP Senators File Measure Protesting Alleged Russian Arms Control Breach

U.S. Senator Marco Rubio, as seen on Sunday at Uber's headquarters in Washington. The Florida Republican and five other GOP senators filed a resolution condemning Russia's alleged violation of a treaty on midrange nuclear missiles.
National Journal
Elaine M. Grossman and Diane Barnes
Add to Briefcase
Elaine M. Grossman and Diane Barnes
March 26, 2014, 10:54 a.m.

Six U.S. Re­pub­lic­an sen­at­ors on Tues­day in­tro­duced a res­ol­u­tion voicing con­cern about an al­leged Rus­si­an breach of a 1987 arms con­trol treaty.

GOP law­makers have as­sailed Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials for what they see as an in­suf­fi­cient U.S. re­sponse to sus­pi­cions that Mo­scow has tested mis­siles in vi­ol­a­tion of the In­ter­me­di­ate-Range Nuc­le­ar Forces Treaty. In the ac­cord, the United States and Rus­sia agreed to re­frain from test­ing or field­ing bal­list­ic or cruise mis­siles with ranges between 300 and 3,400 miles.

“Fresh off the in­va­sion of a sov­er­eign state, Rus­si­an cheat­ing can­not be in­ter­preted in any­thing but the most sin­is­ter terms,” Sen­at­or Marco Ru­bio (R-Fla.) and his col­leagues said in a news re­lease. “Cheat­ing is not a sep­ar­ate is­sue, but is rather re­cog­nized as an equal part of [Rus­si­an] Pres­id­ent [Vladi­mir] Putin’s long-term plan for a re­sur­gent Rus­sia.”

Call­ing the INF Treaty “the cent­ral arms con­trol ac­cord of the nuc­le­ar era,” the law­makers said Wash­ing­ton “must treat it ser­i­ously and pur­sue vi­ol­a­tions re­lent­lessly. There is simply no point in hav­ing treat­ies un­less both sides treat them with the ut­most fi­del­ity, and act in a man­ner bind­ing to the agree­ment.”

Ru­bio, a mem­ber of the Sen­ate For­eign Re­la­tions Com­mit­tee and Se­lect Com­mit­tee on In­tel­li­gence, was joined in in­tro­du­cing the meas­ure by sen­at­ors Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.), John Cornyn (R-Texas), James In­hofe (R-Okla.), Dav­id Vit­ter (R-La.) and Ro­ger Wick­er (R-Miss.).

Three House GOP mem­bers are ad­van­cing com­ple­ment­ary le­gis­la­tion, the state­ment notes.

What We're Following See More »
“HORRIBLE” AND “PAINFUL”
Trump Addresses Threats On Jewish Community Centers
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS
COULD COME TUESDAY
Trump Set To Issue New Travel Ban
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Donald Trump is set to issue a new and more focused executive order clarifying the scope of his travel ban, hoping that the order will survive legal challenges. The new order would focus on the same seven countries, "but would only bar entry to those without a visa and who have never entered the United States before. Unlike the original order, people from those countries who already have permanent U.S. residency (green cards) or visas would not face any restrictions." Some lawyers believe the government will now have much stronger standing, though lawyers who challenged the initial order see the same core problems with the forthcoming ban.

Source:
KELLOGG WILL RETURN TO NSC COS
Trump Taps Lt. Gen. McMaster as NSC Head
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

"President Donald Trump announced Monday that Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster will serve as his next national security adviser, filling the void left last week by the sudden dismissal of Michael Flynn. ... Retired Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg, who had been serving as the acting national security adviser since Flynn's exit, will return to his role as chief of staff of the National Security Council." The pick was widely praised on both sides of the aisle.

Source:
PLANS TO CURB ITS POWER
Pruitt Confirmed As EPA Head
3 days ago
BREAKING
WOULD HAVE REPLACED FLYNN
Harward Turns Down NSC Job
4 days ago
THE LATEST

"Ret. Vice Adm. Bob Harward turned down President Donald Trump's offer to be national security adviser Thursday, depriving the administration of a top candidate for a critical foreign policy post days after Trump fired Michael Flynn." Among the potential reasons: his family, his lack of assurances that he could build his own team, and that "the White House seems so chaotic."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login