Bid to Resurrect Expired Tax Breaks Likely to Drag Out

Restoring incentives, credits, and write-offs that ended Dec. 31 is just one more thing Congress is unlikely to do in this election year.

BRISTOL, TN - AUGUST 25: DJ and Misty Jennings, Anna Herling and Chris Florkey were among four lucky NASCAR fans to enjoy the IRWIN Tools Night Race at the Bristol Motor Speedway from the M&M'S Racing Best Seats in the House on Saturday, August 25, 2012. As the Official Chocolate of NASCAR, M&M'S is upgrading fans to the ideal viewing locations at four races this season as part of an effort to make race day more fun for NASCAR fans in Bristol, Tennessee.
National Journal
Billy House
Add to Briefcase
Billy House
March 26, 2014, 4:24 p.m.

The Sen­ate Fin­ance Com­mit­tee is set to con­sider as early as Wed­nes­day an ex­ten­sion of spe­cial tax write-offs for NAS­CAR racetracks, fed­er­al rum re­bates to Pu­erto Rico, and more than 50 oth­er sim­il­ar spe­cial in­cent­ives or breaks for film pro­du­cers, rail­roads, busi­nesses, and in­di­vidu­als that ex­pired Dec. 31.

Even so, con­sider these items as still locked in limbo, stuck on the ever-ex­pand­ing list of po­ten­tially thorny le­gis­lat­ive activ­it­ies this Con­gress is un­likely to com­plete un­til after the midterm elec­tions in Novem­ber, if then.

Demo­crats who con­trol the Sen­ate have already shrugged off do­ing a blue­print for a budget this year, say­ing that pre­vi­ously agreed-upon spend­ing levels for 2015 suf­fice for ap­pro­pri­at­ors. House Re­pub­lic­ans led by Budget Com­mit­tee Chair­man Paul Ry­an plan to un­veil a budget in up­com­ing weeks, but even some of them con­cede it will be more of an “as­pir­a­tion­al” polit­ic­al-mes­saging tool than a real spend­ing pro­pos­al.

Mean­while, neither the House nor the Sen­ate will move for­ward this year on a pre­vi­ously prom­ised over­haul of the na­tion’s tax code.

All of which begs the ques­tion: What else can Con­gress de­cide not to do dur­ing this elec­tion year?

One in­creas­ingly likely can­did­ate is fur­ther delay in restor­ing the 55 spe­cial busi­ness and in­di­vidu­al tax write-offs, cred­its, or in­cent­ives that ex­pired three months ago at the end of 2013.

For sure, these items rep­res­ent a broad ar­ray of con­tro­ver­sial and non­con­tro­ver­sial meas­ures. They in­clude a state and loc­al gen­er­al sales-tax de­duc­tion, write-offs for re­search and de­vel­op­ment and oth­er busi­ness ex­penses, and a de­duc­tion that teach­ers can take for out-of-pock­et ex­penses for classroom ma­ter­i­als. There also are tax cred­its for such things as two- or three-wheeled plug-in elec­tric vehicles and cer­tain types of fed­er­al health cov­er­age, as well as items re­lat­ing to char­it­ies and dis­aster re­lief.

But there are also sev­er­al ex­pired pro­vi­sions that draw reg­u­lar cri­ti­cism and scorn­ful head­lines, in­clud­ing:

  • A sev­en-year cost-re­cov­ery peri­od for cer­tain mo­tor-sport racetrack fa­cil­it­ies, the so-called NAS­CAR tax cred­it. This al­lows NAS­CAR and oth­er or­gan­iz­a­tions that pro­mote mo­tor sports to de­pre­ci­ate the in­vest­ment in new fa­cil­it­ies over sev­en years in­stead of 15 to 39 years, al­low­ing a much lar­ger de­duc­tion after the ini­tial cap­it­al in­vest­ment. This had been pro­jec­ted to res­ult in lost tax rev­en­ue of about $24 mil­lion in 2014 (the cost was $46 mil­lion in 2013).
  • A 50 per­cent tax cred­it for cer­tain rail­road ex­pendit­ures made by short-line and re­gion­al op­er­at­ors to main­tain tracks, pro­jec­ted to res­ult in $99 mil­lion in lost tax rev­en­ue in 2014 ($232 mil­lion in 2013).
  • Spe­cial “ex­pens­ing rules” for TV and film pro­duc­tion in the United States, pro­jec­ted to res­ult in $164 mil­lion in lost tax rev­en­ue in 2014 ($266 mil­lion in 2013).
  • A re­bate to Pu­erto Rico and the U.S. Vir­gin Is­lands that in­creases their take of the ex­cise tax on rum, pro­jec­ted to res­ult in $23 mil­lion in lost tax rev­en­ue in 2014 ($199 mil­lion in 2013).

Al­to­geth­er, these and oth­er breaks rep­res­ent roughly $938 bil­lion in po­ten­tial lost rev­en­ue through 2023, ac­cord­ing to pro­jec­tions by the Con­gres­sion­al Budget Of­fice.

Re­gard­less of re­l­at­ive mer­it or pre­vail­ing law­maker per­spect­ive, however, un­cer­tainty abounds over what will hap­pen as these items re­main in limbo.

That doubt re­mains, des­pite some re­por­ted move­ment Wed­nes­day on the Sen­ate side of the Cap­it­ol. Seni­or staff and oth­er sources with know­ledge of these de­tails on and off the Hill said new Fin­ance Com­mit­tee Chair­man Ron Wyden, D-Ore. — fol­low­ing dis­cus­sions with oth­er com­mit­tee mem­bers — now plans to have his com­mit­tee mark up an ex­tender bill as early as next Wed­nes­day.

Ex­actly which items will be in the bill and wheth­er the list will be whittled down from the 55 meas­ures that ex­pired in Decem­ber re­main un­clear. Wheth­er the pro­posed ex­ten­sions would run for one or two years was also un­settled. The bill is ex­pec­ted to be un­veiled Monday.

It is un­likely Wyden would use the bill in­tro­duced by Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id in Decem­ber that would have ex­ten­ded most of the items ret­ro­act­ively through the end of 2014. That’s be­cause Wyden is widely per­ceived to want to cut the num­ber of ex­ten­sions, and vot­ing to ac­tu­ally de­lete pro­vi­sions from a bill is viewed, polit­ic­ally, as a po­ten­tially bad move.

As a res­ult, sources say the strategy could be to hold sep­ar­ate votes on wheth­er to add items such as ex­ten­sions of the pro­vi­sions deal­ing with NAS­CAR, film pro­duc­tion, and elec­tric mo­tor­bikes.

A com­mit­tee spokes­wo­man, Lind­sey Held, would not com­ment, say­ing only that ad­dress­ing the ex­pired ex­tenders “is a top pri­or­ity for the chair­man” and that Wyden is in talks with rank­ing mem­ber Or­rin Hatch and oth­er com­mit­tee mem­bers. “We are tar­get­ing early April (stay tuned) but not dis­cuss­ing fur­ther as this time,” she said in an email state­ment.

Ju­lia Law­less, a spokes­wo­man for Hatch, con­firmed that dis­cus­sions are on­go­ing with Wyden, but that no fi­nal de­cisions have been made about what is to oc­cur. She also re­it­er­ated that Hatch be­lieves there is “a lot of fat that needs to be cut,” and that “a com­mit­tee markup would provide an op­por­tun­ity to ex­pose these pro­vi­sions to scru­tiny and sun­light.”

But even if an ex­tender pack­age does pro­gress through the Fin­ance Com­mit­tee and gets through the Sen­ate, the pos­sib­il­ity of par­al­lel House ac­tion be­fore Novem­ber seems re­mote. About 50 House Re­pub­lic­ans have said they will re­fuse to sup­port an ex­tender bill that is not off­set.

And House Ways and Means Com­mit­tee Chair­man Dave Camp him­self seemed to in­dic­ate Monday to fel­low com­mit­tee mem­bers that any swift fi­nal ac­tion on an ex­tender bill might not be in the cards. In­stead, he is sug­gest­ing a more de­lib­er­at­ive and se­lect­ive “policy-by-policy” ap­proach start­ing in April on de­cid­ing which ex­tenders should pos­sibly be made per­man­ent.

“One im­port­ant goal of tax re­form is to provide cer­tainty to Amer­ic­an tax­pay­ers. I think we can all agree that a short-term ex­ten­sion of tax policies is no way to le­gis­late and is even worse for the fam­il­ies and busi­nesses who util­ize those tax be­ne­fits,” Camp wrote to his com­mit­tee col­leagues in a memo provided to Na­tion­al Journ­al.

What We're Following See More »
TRUMP CONTINUES TO LAWYER UP
Kasowitz Out, John Dowd In
3 days ago
THE LATEST

As the Russia investigation heats up, "the role of Marc E. Kasowitz, the president’s longtime New York lawyer, will be significantly reduced. Mr. Trump liked Mr. Kasowitz’s blunt, aggressive style, but he was not a natural fit in the delicate, politically charged criminal investigation. The veteran Washington defense lawyer John Dowd will take the lead in representing Mr. Trump for the Russia inquiry."

Source:
ALSO INQUIRES ABOUT PARDON POWER
Trump Looking to Discredit Mueller
3 days ago
THE LATEST

President Trump's attorneys are "actively compiling a list of Mueller’s alleged potential conflicts of interest, which they say could serve as a way to stymie his work." They plan to argued that Mueller is going outside the scope of his investigation, in inquiring into Trump's finances. They're also playing small ball, highlighting "donations to Democrats by some of" Mueller's team, and "an allegation that Mueller and Trump National Golf Club in Northern Virginia had a dispute over membership fees when Mueller resigned as a member in 2011." Trump is said to be incensed that Mueller may see his tax returns, and has been asking about his power to pardon his family members.

Source:
INCLUDES NY PROBE INTO MANAFORT
Why Yes, Mueller Is Looking into Trump Businesses
3 days ago
THE LATEST

In addition to ties between Russia and the Trump campaign, Robert Mueller's team is also "examining a broad range of transactions involving Trump’s businesses as well as those of his associates, according to a person familiar with the probe. FBI investigators and others are looking at Russian purchases of apartments in Trump buildings, Trump’s involvement in a controversial SoHo development in New York with Russian associates, the 2013 Miss Universe pageant in Moscow, and Trump’s sale of a Florida mansion to a Russian oligarch in 2008, the person said. The investigation also has absorbed a money-laundering probe begun by federal prosecutors in New York into Trump’s former campaign chairman Paul Manafort."

Source:
Mueller Expands Probe to Trump Business Transactions
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team is "is examining a broad range of transactions involving Trump’s businesses as well as those of his associates", including "Russian purchases of apartments in Trump buildings, Trump’s involvement in a controversial SoHo development with Russian associates, the 2013 Miss Universe pageant in Moscow and Trump’s sale of a Florida mansion to a Russian oligarch in 2008."

Source:
ANALYSIS FROM CBO
32 Million More Uninsured by 2026 if Obamacare Repealed
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"A Senate bill to gut Obamacare would increase the number of uninsured people by 32 million and double premiums on Obamacare's exchanges by 2026, according to an analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. The analysis is of a bill that passed Congress in 2015 that would repeal Obamacare's taxes and some of the mandates. Republicans intend to leave Obamacare in place for two years while a replacement is crafted and implemented."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login