President Obama outlined his plan Thursday to end the National Security Agency’s controversial practice of collecting records on millions of U.S. phone calls.
But the program will continue as it is currently structured until Congress can pass the president’s proposal — or something similar.
Under Obama’s plan, the vast database of phone records would stay in the hands of the phone companies. To access data on a particular target, the NSA would have to first obtain an order from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. The NSA would be able to bypass the court process for an “emergency situation.”
Those orders would force the phone companies to provide data, such as incoming and outgoing phone numbers and call times, on an ongoing basis. The phone companies would also have to provide technical assistance to ensure the government can easily mine though the records. A senior administration official said the phone companies would likely receive money to cover their compliance expenses, although the details haven’t been worked out yet.
The phone companies would oppose any new data retention mandate, but Obama’s plan would not force them to hold the data longer than they already do under federal rules.
“I am confident that this approach can provide our intelligence and law-enforcement professionals the information they need to keep us safe while addressing the legitimate privacy concerns that have been raised,” President Obama said in a statement.
The administration’s current authority from the FISC to collect vast batches of records from the phone companies is set to expire Friday. Given that Congress won’t be able to enact any reforms before then, the administration plans to ask the court to extend the program in its current form for an additional 90 days.
Privacy groups and some lawmakers, including Democratic Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, have said the president should let the program lapse.
But the president argued that having some capability to mine through phone records to track possible terrorist plots is critical for national security. He maintained that he can’t impose the changes unilaterally because “legislation will be needed to permit the government to obtain this information with the speed and in the manner that will be required to make this approach workable.”
The top Republican and Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee introduced legislation earlier this week that would make similar reforms to the NSA’s bulk collection program. But unlike the president’s proposal, their bill would only require that the FISC review the orders for data after the fact rather than approve them ahead of time.
Leahy and other lawmakers are continuing to push a more aggressive bill, the USA Freedom Act, which would raise the standard the NSA would need to meet to obtain the phone data and make reforms to other programs, such as Internet surveillance of people in other countries.
Privacy advocates applauded Obama’s proposal and noted how far he had come since initially defending the program after it was revealed by Edward Snowden last June.
But they worried that the proposal only applies to the bulk collection of phone call information under a specific provision of the Patriot Act and wouldn’t affect other NSA programs sweeping in records such as financial data or emails.
“Any proposal to address the problem of bulk data collection is fatally incomplete if it doesn’t prohibit the bulk collection of any kind of record under any of the NSA’s various legal authorities,” said Kevin Bankston, the policy director for the Open Technology Institute at the New America Foundation.
What We're Following See More »
President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."
Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.
Members of Congress are eyeing a one-week spending bill which would keep the government open past the Friday night deadline, giving lawmakers an extra week to iron out a long-term deal to fund the government. Without any action, the government would run out of funding starting at midnight Saturday. “I am optimistic that a final funding package will be completed soon," said Rep. Rodney Frelinghuysen, R-N.J., chairman of the House Appropriations Committee.
The White House on Wednesday laid out its plan for tax reform, with Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin saying it would be "the biggest tax cut and the largest tax reform in the history of our country." The tax code would be broken down into just three tax brackets, with the highest personal income tax rate cut from 39.6 percent to 35 percent. The plan would also slash the tax rate on corporations and small businesses from 35 percent to 15 percent. "The White House plan is a set of principles with few details, but it’s designed to be the starting point of a major push to urge Congress to pass a comprehensive tax reform package this year," said National Economic Council Director Gary Cohn.