Congress Eyes New Iran Terror Sanctions After Failed Push on Nuclear Penalties

Global Security Newswire Staff
Add to Briefcase
Global Security Newswire Staff
March 28, 2014, 10:04 a.m.

A stalled U.S. push to ad­vance new nuc­le­ar sanc­tions against Ir­an has law­makers mulling how to hit it with ter­ror­ism-re­lated pen­al­ties in­stead, al-Mon­it­or re­ports.

A pro­pos­al to fur­ther ex­act a cost on Ir­an for sup­port­ing Hezbol­lah has been un­der con­sid­er­a­tion at the House For­eign Af­fairs Com­mit­tee for months, the pub­lic­a­tion said in a Thursday art­icle. However, the ini­ti­at­ive re­portedly gained new mo­mentum after Demo­crat­ic law­makers stopped push­ing to ad­vance sep­ar­ate le­gis­la­tion that would threaten new nuc­le­ar sanc­tions against the Middle East­ern na­tion.

The United States and five oth­er coun­tries agreed not to im­pose fresh atom­ic pen­al­ties against Ir­an for the dur­a­tion of a six-month atom­ic deal that took ef­fect in Janu­ary. Any new nuc­le­ar sanc­tions, ac­cord­ing to Tehran, would prompt it to with­draw from an on­go­ing dia­logue over con­cerns about its nuc­le­ar pro­gram.

Ir­an ex­ten­ded that warn­ing to cov­er any sanc­tions that would be triggered if Tehran does not agree to spe­cif­ic terms in a po­ten­tial fi­nal nuc­le­ar ac­cord. The Per­sian Gulf power in­sists its atom­ic am­bi­tions are purely peace­ful, but has voiced open­ness to po­ten­tially ac­cept­ing long-term re­stric­tions on the ef­forts in re­turn for sanc­tions re­lief from the five per­man­ent U.N. Se­cur­ity Coun­cil mem­ber na­tions and Ger­many.

Pres­id­ent Obama pre­vi­ously is­sued a veto threat for the Nuc­le­ar Weapon Free Ir­an Act, one bill con­tain­ing Ir­an pen­al­ties. Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id (D-Nev.) sub­sequently blocked floor con­sid­er­a­tion of the pro­pos­al, which has 59 co-spon­sors.

Ac­cord­ing to one House staffer, Obama of­fi­cials “can’t say to Con­gress that we’re go­ing to blow up the nuc­le­ar ne­go­ti­ations by passing fur­ther au­thor­iz­a­tions for Hezbol­lah sanc­tions.”

Former U.S. Treas­ury De­part­ment Mat­thew Levitt, though, sug­ges­ted that a num­ber of Obama in­siders “would prob­ably not want to see it right now if it has any­thing to do with Ir­an at all.”

What We're Following See More »
TROUBLE LOOMING?
Durbin Says Government Shutdown Possible
2 minutes ago
THE LATEST
AT LEAST 19 TODAY
Jewish Community Keeps Receiving Threats
9 minutes ago
THE DETAILS
DECLINES TO HEAR APPEAL
SCOTUS Leaves Political Ad Disclosure Law In Place
3 hours ago
BREAKING

The Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear an appeal to the "federal disclosure rules for political advertising," leaving in place the ruling by a lower court upholding a law requiring the disclosure of donors to political ads. The appeal came from "a Denver-based libertarian think tank that wanted to run an ad without being forced to divulge its major donors," which argued that the requirement was a violation of first amendment rights under the Court's Citizens United decision.

Source:
ENLISTS THEIR HELP IN REPEAL/REPLACE
Trump Meets with Health Execs
3 hours ago
THE LATEST
WOULD CUT NON-DEFENSE BY SAME AMOUNT
Trump Budget Would Bump Defense Spending by $54 Billion
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The Trump administration is proposing a budget it says will increase defense spending by $54 billion and cut non-defense spending by the same amount. The White House is sending a topline budget proposal reflecting those figures to federal agencies on Monday afternoon, according to an Office of Management and Budget official." An unnamed OMB official said most federal agencies would face cutbacks.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login