What David Axelrod Told Bill Clinton in 1996

The future Obama strategist advised Clinton’s senior staff on at least two big speeches during and after the 1996 campaign.

WASHINGTON - MAY 21: White House Senior Adviser David Axelrod arrives prior to a speech by U.S. President Barack Obama at the National Archives May 21, 2009 in Washington, DC. Obama made his case on the closing of the Guantanamo Bay detention facility after the Senate and House have both voted not to grant his request.
National Journal
Alex Seitz Wald
Add to Briefcase
Alex Seitz-Wald
March 28, 2014, 12:20 p.m.

Dav­id Axel­rod, the Demo­crat­ic uber-strategist who en­gin­eered Barack Obama’s up­set de­feat of Hil­lary Clin­ton in 2008, ad­vised Bill Clin­ton 12 years earli­er on at least two ma­jor speeches, ac­cord­ing to doc­u­ments re­leased Fri­day by the Clin­ton Lib­rary.

In Au­gust 1996, Axel­rod sent a memo to Clin­ton aides with his thoughts on the pres­id­ent’s up­com­ing ac­cept­ance speech at the Demo­crat­ic Na­tion­al Con­ven­tion. Rahm Emanuel, then a seni­or ad­viser to the Clin­ton White House, for­war­ded Axel­rod’s memo to oth­er seni­or aides, in­clud­ing Le­on Pan­etta, George Stephan­o­poulos, Har­old Ickes, and speech­writer Mi­chael Wald­man, telling his col­leagues it was “worth your time.”

“Even though I’m sure you have more cooks hov­er­ing around the broth than you need, I wanted to briefly share a few thoughts and sug­ges­tions,” Axel­rod wrote the night after Bob Dole ac­cep­ted his nom­in­a­tion at the Re­pub­lic­an Na­tion­al Con­ven­tion, of­fer­ing up chunks of text to be used in the speech.

Axel­rod’s firm did not im­me­di­ately re­spond to a re­quest for more de­tails about the nature of his work for Clin­ton, or wheth­er he was paid.

First, he ad­vised Clin­ton to take the high road in the speech, ur­ging the pres­id­ent to praise Dole’s years of ser­vice to the coun­try. Second, he sug­ges­ted the pres­id­ent re­but Dole’s de­sire to con­nect with the Amer­ic­an past by stat­ing that he wants to “build a bridge to the fu­ture.”

The speech Clin­ton de­livered a few days later hit both of these notes. “I be­lieve that Bob Dole and Jack Kemp and Ross Perot love our coun­try,” Clin­ton said when ac­cept­ing the nom­in­a­tion. “I will not at­tack them per­son­ally, or per­mit oth­ers to do it in this party if I can pre­vent it.”

That led right in­to Clin­ton’s head­line-mak­ing mes­sage of the night: “With all re­spect, we do not need to build a bridge to the past. We need to build a bridge to the fu­ture. And that is what I com­mit to you to do. So to­night, let us re­solve to build that bridge to the 21st cen­tury.”

Axel­rod also ad­vised Clin­ton to use Dole’s per­son­al story as a way to re­spond to the GOP nom­in­ee’s at­tacks on Hil­lary Clin­ton’s book It Takes a Vil­lage. That doesn’t seem to have made it in­to the speech.

In a second set of memos, sent to Wald­man in Janu­ary 1997, days be­fore Clin­ton would de­liv­er his second in­aug­ur­al, Axel­rod offered some thoughts on drafts of the speech he had ap­par­ently been sent. It doesn’t ap­pear that any of the lan­guage he offered made it in­to the speech dir­ectly.

“I hope it is, at least, a little use­ful,” the strategist wrote.

The doc­u­ments were among thou­sands of pages made pub­lic Fri­day, part of a series of pre­vi­ously re­dac­ted files.

What We're Following See More »
ANOTHER NUCLEAR OPTION?
Byrd Rule Could Trip Up Health Legislation
9 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”

Source:
ONE WEEK
Senate Votes To Fund Government
11 hours ago
BREAKING
ON TO SENATE
House Passes Spending Bill
12 hours ago
BREAKING

The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.

PRESIDENT CALLS MEDICAID FUNDS A “BAILOUT”
Puerto Rico Another Sticking Point in Budget Talks
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."

Source:
POTENTIAL GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN?
Democrats Threaten Spending Bill Over Obamacare
1 days ago
BREAKING

Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login