Doctors’ groups are not happy about Capitol Hill lawmakers’ inability to reach agreement on Medicare payments.
The Senate voted 64-35 to pass another short-term “doc fix” on Monday, delaying a 24 percent cut in Medicare’s payments to doctors. The one-year patch squeaked through the House last week in a voice vote that many members didn’t even know was happening.
And doctors’ lobbying associations aren’t happy about it. They had high hopes for a solution that would permanently replace Medicare’s payment system.
“The physician community made some tough choices and compromises,” a representative at one physicians’ organization said. “And we didn’t really see the same effort put forward on the pay-fors. Frankly, I think that there was a reluctance on both sides of the aisle — on both sides of the Capitol — to make provider cuts, reluctance to make those choices prior to the election.”
Since 2003, Congress has passed 16 “doc fixes” to stop automatic cuts put in place by the Sustainable Growth Rate formula used to determine Medicare physicians’ pay.
The Senate’s vote is widely viewed among the doctor community as the disappointing conclusion of a long, bipartisan, bicameral effort to come to agreement on a long-term repeal and replacement of that formula. Lawmakers and interest groups reached an agreement on the substance of a new payment formula, but they couldn’t agree on how to offset the bill’s roughly $140 billion price tag.
“Too many in Congress lacked the courage and wherewithal to permanently fix Medicare to improve care for patients and provide greater certainty for physician practices,” Ardis Dee Hoven, president of the American Medical Association, said in an email. “Congressional leadership had to resort to trickery to pass an SGR patch that was opposed by physicians.”
The AMA, along with more than 80 other doctors’ groups, sent a letter to House leadership condemning the short-term fix.
What a short-term patch means for the legislation that would permanently repeal and replace the SGR formula is unclear: Members of Congress could sit back down to the negotiating table in the fall, after the midterm elections, when they are facing no guillotine if they make unpopular cuts to pay for the bill.
This story was updated at 7 p.m. Eastern to include the Senate vote count.
What We're Following See More »
Following their meeting, President Enrique Peña Nieto of Mexico and Republican nominee for president, Donald Trump, briefly addressed the media, with Peña Nieto subtly rebuking Trump's rhetoric. While he spoke respectfully about Trump, Peña Nieto did not back down, saying that free trade has proved effective and that illegal immigration into America from the south has decreased over the last ten years while the flow of people and drugs into Mexico has increased. Additionally, he stressed that Mexicans in America are "honest" and "deserve respect." Trump responded, calling some Mexicans "tremendous people" while saying others are "beyond reproach." Trump laid out five important issues, including the end of illegal immigration and the ability for either country to build a wall or border. However, Trump said he did not discuss who would pay for the wall.
A divided Supreme Court "refused Wednesday to reinstate North Carolina’s voter identification requirement and keep just 10 days of early in-person voting. The court rejected a request by Gov. Pat McCrory and other state officials to delay a lower court ruling that found the state law was tainted by racial discrimination."
"Police say a woman walked into U.S. Rep. Danny Davis' office on Chicago's West Side, drank out of a bottle of hand sanitizer, poured the sanitizer over herself and set herself on fire with a lighter." The Democrat wasn't in the office at the time.