Wisconsin May Expel a State Lawmaker for the First Time in Almost 100 Years

Rep. Bill Kramer is accused of groping a political staffer at a fundraiser in Washington.

Wisconsin state Rep. Bill Kramer (R-Waukesha)
National Journal
Emma Roller
Add to Briefcase
Emma Roller
March 31, 2014, 11:50 a.m.

For the first time in al­most a cen­tury, the Wis­con­sin state Le­gis­lature may vote to ex­pel one of its mem­bers. Rep. Bill Kramer, who rep­res­ents a con­ser­vat­ive sub­urb in the south­east­ern part of the state, has been ac­cused of grop­ing and sexu­ally har­ass­ing two wo­men, nearly three years apart.

Kramer is ac­cused of sexu­ally har­ass­ing a fe­male lob­by­ist and a le­gis­lat­ive aide at a fun­draiser in Wash­ing­ton last month. He has been charged on two counts of second-de­gree sexu­al as­sault. If con­victed on both charges, Kramer could face up to 80 years in pris­on and $200,000 in fines.

Kramer, who has been in of­fice since 2006, has been a stal­wart in the Re­pub­lic­an-con­trolled Le­gis­lature since Gov. Scott Walk­er was elec­ted in 2010. Kramer has served as ma­jor­ity lead­er in the state As­sembly since Septem­ber. After the charges came to light, he was sum­mar­ily stripped of his title, but re­mains a mem­ber of the Le­gis­lature.

After the ac­cus­a­tions sur­faced, Kramer checked him­self in­to an un­spe­cified treat­ment pro­gram.

Kramer has already an­nounced he will not seek reelec­tion, but his at­tor­ney, James Gatzke, says his cli­ent has no in­ten­tion of leav­ing of­fice early. “He’s not go­ing to,” Gatzke told Na­tion­al Journ­al. “He’s de­cided to take ad­vant­age of the [crim­in­al justice] pro­cess just like any­one else is able to take ad­vant­age of the pro­cess.”

In or­der to ex­pel Kramer, two-thirds of the state As­sembly would have to vote to kick him out. The last time a Wis­con­sin state law­maker was ex­pelled was in 1917, when a so­cial­ist state sen­at­or re­fused to re­tract state­ments that were per­ceived as anti-Amer­ic­an. The state As­sembly lead­er­ship is now mulling its op­tions, and de­cid­ing wheth­er to take pun­it­ive ac­tion against Kramer be­fore he is con­victed.

Kramer is ac­cused of har­ass­ing a fe­male lob­by­ist and grop­ing a staffer at a fun­draiser in Feb­ru­ary. Spe­cific­ally, ac­cord­ing to the Mil­wau­kee Journ­al Sen­tinel:

Wit­nesses have al­leged that Kramer hugged a le­gis­lat­ive staffer and touched her breasts at a so­cial event after the D.C. fun­draiser. He also al­legedly made vul­gar re­marks about his sexu­al prowess to a lob­by­ist on that night of Feb. 26 and again the next day on a flight back to Wis­con­sin.

When a de­tect­ive asked Kramer to re­spond to al­leg­a­tions of touch­ing a wo­man’s breasts, he said the wo­man “has very nice, doc­tor-en­hanced breasts. I am not a big fan of those. I like the real ones.”

After these al­leg­a­tions came out, a sep­ar­ate fe­male polit­ic­al staffer re­por­ted an­oth­er in­cid­ent in­volving Kramer. She told po­lice that in 2011 or 2012, Kramer as­saul­ted her after a Re­pub­lic­an gath­er­ing at a loc­al bar.

In the po­lice re­port, she said Kramer was “really drunk.” They walked back to her car, and after deny­ing his sexu­al ad­vances, Kramer is said to have shoved her up against her car, for­cibly kissed her, and pushed his hands un­der her shirt to feel her breasts. Ac­cord­ing to the al­leged vic­tim, Kramer later made more un­wanted sexu­al ad­vances, grabbing her groin and ex­pli­citly telling her what he wanted to do with her.

The staffer de­scribed the in­cid­ent as a “night­mare,” but did not ini­tially re­port it for fear of pub­lic em­bar­rass­ment. She did, however, threaten to tell her story to the po­lice if Kramer ever sexu­ally har­assed her or someone else.

What We're Following See More »
FORMER GOVERNOR, AMBASSADOR TO CHINA
Jon Huntsman in Line to be #2 at State
7 hours ago
THE DETAILS
SHOW OF UNITY
Ellison Bringing New DNC Chair Perez To Trump’s Address
7 hours ago
BREAKING
CASE TO CARRY ON
DOJ Drops Claim Against Texas’s Voter ID Law
7 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Department of Justice "is dropping a discrimination claim against a Texas law that required voters to present identification at the polls." The case will continue to carry on with private groups who filed the lawsuit. The DOJ dropped the claim because Texas is planning to "cure the deficiencies" with the law, according to a draft copy of the dismissal motion the DOJ sent to the Campaign Legal Center. Texas Governor Jim Abbott tweeted a picture of a headline sharing the information with a caption saying "It's a new day in D.C."

Source:
TROUBLE LOOMING?
Durbin Says Government Shutdown Possible
9 hours ago
THE LATEST
AT LEAST 19 TODAY
Jewish Community Keeps Receiving Threats
9 hours ago
THE DETAILS
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login