Russia has fielded more strategic nuclear weapons over the past six months, but a longtime U.S. analyst suggests the development is unremarkable.
Moscow boosted its count of “deployed” nuclear-bomb delivery vehicles by 25 between Sept. 1 and March 1, increasing its total number of fielded systems to 498, according to an independent analysis of figures made public on Tuesday. The delivery platforms can include nuclear-tipped ballistic missiles held in submarines and underground silos, as well as certain long-range bomber aircraft.
Still, Hans Kristensen, director of the Nuclear Information Project at the Federation of American Scientists, said Russia’s additional deployments do not mean Moscow is adopting a more aggressive posture.
Rather, they fell in a series of other nuclear-arms “fluctuations” that Russia and the United States have reported under the terms of a nuclear arms control treaty, he said.
“At the time of the previous data release in September 2013, the United States appeared to have increased its forces. But that was also an anomaly reflecting temporary fluctuations in the deployed force,” Kristensen said in an analysis for the FAS Strategic Security blog.
The United States decreased its count of deployed launch platforms by 31 between September and March, according to the data released by the U.S. State Department. However, Washington still fielded 300 more delivery systems than its former Cold War adversary.
Neither government released specifics on how it rearranged its missiles or bombers between September and March.
Kristensen noted, though, that Washington plans to issue “a declassified overview of its forces” later this year.
“Russia does not publish a detailed overview of its strategic forces,” he wrote.
Under the New START arms control treaty, each side by 2018 must cap its deployments at 700 missiles and bombers, with backup fleets of no more than 100 additional delivery vehicles. The pact also would also bar each country from deploying more than 1,550 nuclear warheads.
What We're Following See More »
"The Obama administration on Tuesday called on U.S. states to ban agreements prohibiting many workers from moving to their employers’ rivals, saying it would lead to a more competitive labor market and faster wage growth. The administration said so-called non-compete agreements interfere with worker mobility and states should consider barring companies from requiring low-wage workers and other employees who are not privy to trade secrets or other special circumstances to sign them."
House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz plans to spend "years, come January, probing the record of a President Hillary Clinton." Chaffetz told the Washington Post: “It’s a target-rich environment. Even before we get to Day One, we’ve got two years’ worth of material already lined up. She has four years of history at the State Department, and it ain’t good.”
Hillary Clinton's transition team has in place strict rules to limit the influence that lobbyists could have "in crafting the nominee’s policy agenda." The move makes it unlikely, at least for now, that Clinton would overturn Obama's executive order limiting the role that lobbyists play in government
Federal employees from 14 agencies have given nearly $2 million in campaign donations in the presidential race thus far, and 95 percent of the donations, totaling $1.9 million, have been to the Clinton campaign. Employees at the State Department, which Clinton lead for four years, has given 99 percent of its donations to the Democratic nominee.
Trying to save control of the Senate, the Senate Leadership Fund, a super PAC with ties to Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, is spending $25 million on six races over the last two weeks of the race. Republicans have been consistently outspent in a majority of the Senate races this cycle. Aside from spending in Nevada, all the spending will come in defense of Republican-held seats.