The Next Campaign Finance Fight

People file out of the Supreme Court after the morning session hearing arguments on the Affordable Care Act on Wednesday, march 28, 2012, the last day of hearings. 
National Journal
Alex Roarty
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Alex Roarty
April 3, 2014, 7:40 a.m.

In the short run, yes­ter­day’s much-hyped Su­preme Court rul­ing won’t mean much. Elim­in­at­ing over­all con­tri­bu­tion lim­its will give the party com­mit­tees and can­did­ates a little ex­tra cash in their pock­et, but the cam­paign fin­ance land­scape is largely the same as it was when Wed­nes­day began. It’s what might come next that would fun­da­ment­ally upend the cam­paign fin­an­cing sys­tem. The at­tor­neys and ex­perts study­ing yes­ter­day’s Mc­Cutcheon v. FEC rul­ing sug­gest it could make vul­ner­able one of the bed­rock rules of the cam­paign fin­ance sys­tem: Caps on in­di­vidu­al con­tri­bu­tions to parties and can­did­ates.

— Mc­Cu­theon is sig­ni­fic­ant, at­tor­neys say, be­cause it’s one of the first cases to fo­cus on con­tri­bu­tions, not ex­pendit­ures (the fo­cus of Cit­izens United and oth­er cases). As one GOP fin­ance at­tor­ney put it, cam­paign fin­ance re­lies on three ele­ments: rules gov­ern­ing ex­pendit­ures, con­tri­bu­tions, and dis­clos­ure. The courts have ripped apart most ex­pendit­ure reg­u­la­tions; the fear among re­form ad­voc­ates is now they’ve turned their at­ten­tion to con­tri­bu­tions.

— Those same ad­voc­ates ar­gued that the court’s ma­jor­ity opin­ion, writ­ten by Chief Justice John Roberts, re­af­firmed the leg­al­ity of con­tri­bu­tion lim­its. But they’re also real­ist­ic: This isn’t a court that’s been kind to their way of think­ing about cam­paign fin­ance reg­u­la­tions. None would be ser­i­ously sur­prised if in­di­vidu­al con­tri­bu­tion lim­its came un­der scru­tiny next.

— Here’s a pos­sible out­come to keep an eye on, sug­ges­ted by GOP cam­paign fin­ance at­tor­ney Wil­li­am Mc­Gin­ley: The Su­preme Court even­tu­ally rules that con­tri­bu­tion lim­its are con­sti­tu­tion­al but stip­u­lates that the cur­rent caps are far too low. Ex­pect dis­cus­sion in the com­ing weeks about le­gis­lat­ive ac­tion to raise those lim­its (of course, as usu­al, don’t hold your breath wait­ing for le­gis­lat­ive ac­tion).

The coun­try’s post-Wa­ter­gate cam­paign fin­ance sys­tem has been turned on its head in re­cent years. And the changes might not be done yet.
— Alex Roarty

What We're Following See More »
Trump Deposition Video Is Online
9 hours ago

The video of Donald Trump's deposition in his case against restaurateur Jeffrey Zakarian is now live. Slate's Jim Newell and Josh Voorhees are live-blogging it while they watch.

Debate Commission Admits Issues with Trump’s Mic
10 hours ago

The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.

Trump Deposition Video to Be Released
10 hours ago

"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."

Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
14 hours ago

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
1 days ago

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."