U.S. Brass: North Korea Capable of Rapidly Attacking South

Global Security Newswire Staff
Add to Briefcase
Global Security Newswire Staff
April 3, 2014, 6:34 a.m.

The head of U.S. forces on the Korean Pen­in­sula on Wed­nes­day warned that North Korea has the abil­ity to con­duct an as­sault on the South at a mo­ment’s no­tice.

In testi­mony to the House Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee, Army Gen. Curtis Scapar­rotti said,”The Kim Jong Un re­gime is dan­ger­ous and has the cap­ab­il­ity … to at­tack South Korea with little or no warn­ing,” Stars and Stripes re­por­ted.

In re­cent days Kim threatened to use the North Korean mil­it­ary to “crush” what he per­ceived as a hos­tile U.S. policy to­ward his coun­try. That threat comes on the heels of a Monday live-fire mari­time ex­er­cise car­ried out by the North that sent some shells across a dis­puted sea line with the South. And on Sunday, Py­ongy­ang warned it was pre­pared to carry out a “new” type of nuc­le­ar test and would stage fur­ther mil­it­ary drills aimed at im­prov­ing the abil­ity to strike longer-range tar­gets.

“This is a com­mon strategy with North Korea to come out of a peri­od of calm and to use these types of ac­tions” to send a mes­sage about Py­ongy­ang’s “dis­pleas­ure” with U.S. mil­it­ary ex­er­cises in the re­gion, Scapar­rotti said.

Mean­while, South Korea, the United States and Ja­pan are slated to con­vene tri­lat­er­al talks next week in Wash­ing­ton that will fo­cus on pro­spects for re­in­vig­or­at­ing a frozen mul­tina­tion­al pro­cess aimed at achiev­ing ir­re­vers­ible North Korean de­nuc­lear­iz­a­tion. Ahead of that meet­ing, Seoul an­nounced it had ap­poin­ted a new seni­or ne­go­ti­at­or to the nuc­le­ar talks — dip­lo­mat Hwang Joon-kook, the Yon­hap News Agency re­por­ted.

Else­where, a new ana­lys­is pub­lished on Thursday by the ex­pert web­site 38 North con­cluded there is a “high” prob­ab­il­ity of an atom­ic ac­ci­dent oc­cur­ring at the ex­per­i­ment­al light-wa­ter re­act­or re­cently con­struc­ted at North Korea’s Yongby­on nuc­le­ar com­plex.

Ex­perts Niko Mi­lono­poulous and Ed­ward Bland­ford found a num­ber of reas­ons stem­ming from North Korea’s in­ter­na­tion­al isol­a­tion and poverty that could con­trib­ute to a nuc­le­ar melt­down at the re­act­or, in­clud­ing po­ten­tially flawed re­act­or safety blue­prints and pos­sibly shoddy con­struc­tion work. A spring 2013 im­age ana­lys­is by 38 North con­cluded that ex­tern­al work on the re­act­or ap­peared to be done but that it was not clear if activ­it­ies were go­ing on to op­er­a­tion­al­ize the fa­cil­ity.

What We're Following See More »
STRIKES DOWN NEW HAMPSHIRE BAN
Court: Selfies in Voting Booth Now OK
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
WILL LEAD U.S. DELEGATION
Obama to Travel to Israel for Peres’s Funeral
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS
FOUR-POINT LEAD IN FOUR-WAY RACE
Reuters/Ipsos Shows Clinton Ahead by 6
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

In one of the first polls released since Monday night's debate, a Reuters/Ipsos survey shows Hillary Clinton leading Donald Trump 44%-38%. When third-party candidates are thrown into the mix, Clinton's share of the vote drops to 42%, with Gary Johnson picking up 7% and Jill Stein at 2%.

Source:
NO SHUTDOWN
Senate Votes to Fund Government
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Senate voted on Wednesday 72-26 on a bill to fund the government through Dec. 9, averting a looming shutdown. The legislation will now go to the House, where it could be voted on as early as Wednesday. After this legislation is approved by the House, Congress will recess until the lame-duck session following elections.

FIRST OVERRIDE OF HIS PRESIDENCY
House Completes Override of Obama Veto
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Congress voted Wednesday to override President Obama for the first time in his eight-year tenure, as the House followed the Senate in rejecting a veto of legislation allowing families of terrorist victims to sue Saudi Arabia. The House easily cleared the two-thirds threshold to push back against the veto. The final tally was 348-77, with 18 Republicans and 59 Democrats voting no."

Source:
×