Group Wants the FEC to Release Redacted Crossroads GPS Document

National Journal
Shane Goldmacher
See more stories about...
Shane Goldmacher
April 4, 2014, 9:57 a.m.

The Cen­ter for Com­pet­it­ive Polit­ics, a group that pushes to roll back cam­paign fin­ance re­stric­tions, said Fri­day that it had filed a re­cords re­quest to the Fed­er­al Elec­tion Com­mis­sion for a con­tro­ver­sial re­dac­ted doc­u­ment in a case about wheth­er Cross­roads GPS was a le­git­im­ate non­profit. The group sug­ges­ted it might take leg­al ac­tion if the doc­u­ment isn’t re­leased.

“It’s out­rageous that the FEC ig­nored its own policies and reg­u­la­tions that re­quire this doc­u­ment to be dis­closed,” Dave Keat­ing, the pres­id­ent of the Cen­ter and former ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of the Club for Growth, said in a state­ment.

Na­tion­al Journ­al first re­por­ted on the sealed doc­u­ment last month, and the magazine’s story is cited in the group’s Free­dom of In­form­a­tion Act re­quest.

The story of the re­dac­tion be­gins when the FEC dead­locked in the Cross­roads GPS case last Decem­ber. As both sides draf­ted their du­el­ing par­tis­an state­ments, the FEC’s Re­pub­lic­an com­mis­sion­ers sought to at­tach an ini­tial re­com­mend­a­tion from the FEC’s law­yers in the case. That first re­port had been with­drawn and re­placed with a fi­nal re­port from the coun­sel’s of­fice, which was pub­lic. Against their wishes, all 76 pages of the re­port that the Re­pub­lic­an com­mis­sion­ers sought to pub­lish were re­dac­ted.

“We do not be­lieve that these re­dac­tions are ne­ces­sary,” the Re­pub­lic­an com­mis­sion­ers later wrote.

It was a strange twist. The Re­pub­lic­ans on the FEC are typ­ic­ally the bloc aligned against fur­ther dis­clos­ure when it comes to cam­paigns and money. This case rep­res­en­ted the re­verse.

Be­hind the scenes, the GOP com­mis­sion­ers sought un­suc­cess­fully to per­suade their Demo­crat­ic col­leagues to un­mask the pages. Demo­crat­ic com­mis­sion­ers were still frus­trated by the ini­tial dead­lock, which came des­pite the fact that the FEC’s law­yers had said Cross­roads GPS should have to re­gister as a polit­ic­al group.

“It should not have been a dif­fi­cult de­cision to in­vest­ig­ate Cross­roads GPS,” Demo­crat­ic FEC Com­mis­sion­er Ann Ravel wrote in a New York Times op-ed this week about the com­mis­sion’s dys­func­tion.

Now the dead­locked com­mis­sion is presen­ted with a re­quest to hand over the pages — or else. The Cen­ter for Com­pet­it­ive Polit­ics, foun­ded by former Re­pub­lic­an FEC Com­mis­sion­er Brad­ley Smith, ag­gress­ively fights cam­paign fin­ance re­stric­tions, and the miss­ing pages could serve as a road map for polit­ic­al groups for how far a non­profit can go without earn­ing a re­buke from elec­tion of­fi­cials.

The fi­nal line of the cen­ter’s re­cords re­quest omin­ously reads: “Un­der FOIA law, the FEC has twenty days to reply be­fore a law­suit can be filed to com­pel dis­clos­ure of the doc­u­ment.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
6 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×