Group Wants the FEC to Release Redacted Crossroads GPS Document

National Journal
Shane Goldmacher
See more stories about...
Shane Goldmacher
April 4, 2014, 9:57 a.m.

The Cen­ter for Com­pet­it­ive Polit­ics, a group that pushes to roll back cam­paign fin­ance re­stric­tions, said Fri­day that it had filed a re­cords re­quest to the Fed­er­al Elec­tion Com­mis­sion for a con­tro­ver­sial re­dac­ted doc­u­ment in a case about wheth­er Cross­roads GPS was a le­git­im­ate non­profit. The group sug­ges­ted it might take leg­al ac­tion if the doc­u­ment isn’t re­leased.

“It’s out­rageous that the FEC ig­nored its own policies and reg­u­la­tions that re­quire this doc­u­ment to be dis­closed,” Dave Keat­ing, the pres­id­ent of the Cen­ter and former ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of the Club for Growth, said in a state­ment.

Na­tion­al Journ­al first re­por­ted on the sealed doc­u­ment last month, and the magazine’s story is cited in the group’s Free­dom of In­form­a­tion Act re­quest.

The story of the re­dac­tion be­gins when the FEC dead­locked in the Cross­roads GPS case last Decem­ber. As both sides draf­ted their du­el­ing par­tis­an state­ments, the FEC’s Re­pub­lic­an com­mis­sion­ers sought to at­tach an ini­tial re­com­mend­a­tion from the FEC’s law­yers in the case. That first re­port had been with­drawn and re­placed with a fi­nal re­port from the coun­sel’s of­fice, which was pub­lic. Against their wishes, all 76 pages of the re­port that the Re­pub­lic­an com­mis­sion­ers sought to pub­lish were re­dac­ted.

“We do not be­lieve that these re­dac­tions are ne­ces­sary,” the Re­pub­lic­an com­mis­sion­ers later wrote.

It was a strange twist. The Re­pub­lic­ans on the FEC are typ­ic­ally the bloc aligned against fur­ther dis­clos­ure when it comes to cam­paigns and money. This case rep­res­en­ted the re­verse.

Be­hind the scenes, the GOP com­mis­sion­ers sought un­suc­cess­fully to per­suade their Demo­crat­ic col­leagues to un­mask the pages. Demo­crat­ic com­mis­sion­ers were still frus­trated by the ini­tial dead­lock, which came des­pite the fact that the FEC’s law­yers had said Cross­roads GPS should have to re­gister as a polit­ic­al group.

“It should not have been a dif­fi­cult de­cision to in­vest­ig­ate Cross­roads GPS,” Demo­crat­ic FEC Com­mis­sion­er Ann Ravel wrote in a New York Times op-ed this week about the com­mis­sion’s dys­func­tion.

Now the dead­locked com­mis­sion is presen­ted with a re­quest to hand over the pages — or else. The Cen­ter for Com­pet­it­ive Polit­ics, foun­ded by former Re­pub­lic­an FEC Com­mis­sion­er Brad­ley Smith, ag­gress­ively fights cam­paign fin­ance re­stric­tions, and the miss­ing pages could serve as a road map for polit­ic­al groups for how far a non­profit can go without earn­ing a re­buke from elec­tion of­fi­cials.

The fi­nal line of the cen­ter’s re­cords re­quest omin­ously reads: “Un­der FOIA law, the FEC has twenty days to reply be­fore a law­suit can be filed to com­pel dis­clos­ure of the doc­u­ment.”

What We're Following See More »
More People Watched Trump’s Acceptance Speech
1 days ago

Hillary Clinton hopes that television ratings for the candidates' acceptance speeches at their respective conventions aren't foreshadowing of similar results at the polls in November. Preliminary results from the networks and cable channels show that 34.9 million people tuned in for Donald Trump's acceptance speech while 33.3 million watched Clinton accept the Democratic nomination. However, it is still possible that the numbers are closer than these ratings suggest: the numbers don't include ratings from PBS or CSPAN, which tend to attract more Democratic viewers.