The Center for Competitive Politics, a group that pushes to roll back campaign finance restrictions, said Friday that it had filed a records request to the Federal Election Commission for a controversial redacted document in a case about whether Crossroads GPS was a legitimate nonprofit. The group suggested it might take legal action if the document isn’t released.
“It’s outrageous that the FEC ignored its own policies and regulations that require this document to be disclosed,” Dave Keating, the president of the Center and former executive director of the Club for Growth, said in a statement.
National Journal first reported on the sealed document last month, and the magazine’s story is cited in the group’s Freedom of Information Act request.
The story of the redaction begins when the FEC deadlocked in the Crossroads GPS case last December. As both sides drafted their dueling partisan statements, the FEC’s Republican commissioners sought to attach an initial recommendation from the FEC’s lawyers in the case. That first report had been withdrawn and replaced with a final report from the counsel’s office, which was public. Against their wishes, all 76 pages of the report that the Republican commissioners sought to publish were redacted.
“We do not believe that these redactions are necessary,” the Republican commissioners later wrote.
It was a strange twist. The Republicans on the FEC are typically the bloc aligned against further disclosure when it comes to campaigns and money. This case represented the reverse.
Behind the scenes, the GOP commissioners sought unsuccessfully to persuade their Democratic colleagues to unmask the pages. Democratic commissioners were still frustrated by the initial deadlock, which came despite the fact that the FEC’s lawyers had said Crossroads GPS should have to register as a political group.
“It should not have been a difficult decision to investigate Crossroads GPS,” Democratic FEC Commissioner Ann Ravel wrote in a New York Times op-ed this week about the commission’s dysfunction.
Now the deadlocked commission is presented with a request to hand over the pages — or else. The Center for Competitive Politics, founded by former Republican FEC Commissioner Bradley Smith, aggressively fights campaign finance restrictions, and the missing pages could serve as a road map for political groups for how far a nonprofit can go without earning a rebuke from election officials.
The final line of the center’s records request ominously reads: “Under FOIA law, the FEC has twenty days to reply before a lawsuit can be filed to compel disclosure of the document.”
What We're Following See More »
In town to receive the Mark Twain Prize for American Humor at the Kennedy Center, Bill Murray casually strolled into the White House Briefing Room this afternoon. A spokesman said he was at the executive mansion for a chat with President Obama, his fellow Chicagoan.
"A federal appeals court's decision that declared the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau an arm of the White House relies on a novel interpretation of the constitution's separation of powers clause that could have broader effects on how other regulators" like the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Housing Finance Agency.
"According to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll, the first national post-debate survey, 43 percent of registered voters said the Democratic candidate won, compared with 26 percent who opted for the Republican Party’s standard bearer. Her 6-point lead over Trump among likely voters is unchanged from our previous survey: Clinton still leads Trump 42 percent to 36 percent in the race for the White House, with Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson taking 9 percent of the vote."
Twitter bots, "automated social media accounts that interact with other users," accounted for a large part of the online discussion during the first presidential debate. Bots made up 22 percent of conversation about Hillary Clinton on the social media platform, and a whopping one third of Twitter conversation about Donald Trump.
The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, the nonprofit that published the Panama Papers earlier this year, is being spun off from its parent organization, the Center for Public Integrity. According to a statement, "CPI’s Board of Directors has decided that enabling the ICIJ to chart its own course will help both journalistic teams build on the massive impact they have had as one organization."