Pentagon leaders expect to soon give President Obama a plan for specific U.S. nuclear cuts to bring the arsenal in line with arms control caps.
A number of alternatives have been under contemplation for reducing deployed bomber aircraft and land- and submarine-based ballistic missiles to meet a limit of 700 delivery systems and 1,550 warheads under the New START agreement, which entered into force in February 2011.
“We’ve looked at this problem very, very hard over the last year,” Adm. James Winnefeld, the vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said in response to a question from Representative Jim Langevin (D-R.I) at a Thursday hearing.
He said defense leaders are “close” to finalizing a recommendation.
“It’s a vexing challenge to look at all of the factors involved and the relative advantages of decreasing [intercontinental ballistic missile] silos and decreasing [submarine-launched ballistic missile] tubes on submarines,” Winnefeld told members of the House Armed Services Committee.
Internal Pentagon discussions surrounding the matter had been “spirited,” the No. 2 military officer added.
At issue is how the Pentagon will alter its mix of delivery vehicles for nuclear weapons — ground-launched Minuteman 3 missiles, submarine-launched Trident D-5 missiles, and bombers — to meet limits of the New START agreement with Russia. Beyond the 700-system cap, 100 delivery platforms are allowed in reserve.
Congress already has waded into the debate. Lawmakers from states hosting the nation’s 450 Minuteman missiles are attempting to block the Pentagon from starting even initial studies into the possibility of closing a portion of their underground launch silos.
Winnefeld on Thursday decried the Pentagon’s inability to proceed with assessing launch-silo requirements, arguing that insights from such analyses are badly needed for future decisions.
In questioning Winnefeld, Langevin indirectly criticized congressional opponents to possible reductions.
“I, for one, would feel much better knowing that decisions made regarding what constitutes a safe, secure and effective deterrent triad is informed by the best judgment of our uniformed leaders about how to balance a deterrent, rather than shaping the nation’s nuclear force based on parochial interests,” the lawmaker said.
What We're Following See More »
"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.
"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."
Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."