Cory Gardner Helps Colorado Set GOP Stage for 2016 and Beyond

Conservative congressman’s race against Sen. Mark Udall illustrates how Republicans need to steer clear of extreme-right positions.

WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 30: U.S. Rep. Cory Gardner (R-CO) (R) questions Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius (L) as she turns around to her aides during the House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing about the troubled launch of the Healthcare.gov website October 30, 2013 in Washington, DC. The federal healthcare insurance exchange site has been plagued by problems since its launch on October 1. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
National Journal
April 6, 2014, 8 a.m.

The Re­pub­lic­an Party’s path to a Sen­ate ma­jor­ity this year lies mostly in a hand­ful of red, largely South­ern states. But no Sen­ate race in 2014 is poised to say more about the GOP’s fu­ture — in 2016 and bey­ond — than the one in Col­or­ado.

The Centen­ni­al State ar­rived late on the midterm map, be­com­ing a mar­quee con­test only after Rep. Cory Gard­ner, who last year pub­licly passed on a cam­paign, re­versed him­self and entered the race against Demo­crat­ic Sen. Mark Ud­all. And as a pickup op­por­tun­ity for Re­pub­lic­ans, it still ranks be­low prime tar­gets like South Dakota, West Vir­gin­ia, Arkan­sas, and Louisi­ana.

But claim­ing vic­tory in a con­ser­vat­ive state like Arkan­sas re­quires the GOP to per­form well with the kind of white, work­ing-class voters who already over­whelm­ingly lean right. Col­or­ado is dif­fer­ent; if Gard­ner wants to win there, he’ll have to as­semble a more di­verse co­ali­tion of sup­port­ers — the type of ra­cially di­verse, well-edu­cated voters the party’s next pres­id­en­tial nom­in­ee will need to win the White House in 2016.

It’s a chal­lenge few Re­pub­lic­an can­did­ates have met of late, either at the pres­id­en­tial level or in Sen­ate races. With the ex­cep­tion of 2010, no GOP Sen­ate can­did­ate had de­feated a Demo­crat­ic can­did­ate in a blue state — either against an in­cum­bent or in an open-seat battle — since Mel Mar­tinez’s 2004 vic­tory in Flor­ida. Then came the last midterm races. That year, three Re­pub­lic­ans won on tra­di­tion­ally Demo­crat­ic turf — Pat Toomey in Pennsylvania, Ron John­son in Wis­con­sin, and Mark Kirk in Illinois.

Party strategists are con­fid­ent this midterm year will look a lot like the last one, the kind of wave that would carry a can­did­ate like Gard­ner to vic­tory. But in 2010 Re­pub­lic­ans failed to win against Demo­crat­ic Sen. Mi­chael Ben­net be­cause their nom­in­ee — a loc­al dis­trict at­tor­ney named Ken Buck — held an ar­ray of ex­treme po­s­i­tions on so­cial is­sues. In a de­bate, for in­stance, he com­pared be­ing gay to al­co­hol­ism.

What makes Gard­ner’s can­did­acy in­triguing, and why Col­or­ado is such a good test case for fu­ture races, is his ap­par­ent de­term­in­a­tion not to fall in­to the same trap. Shortly after an­noun­cing his can­did­acy, Gard­ner re­nounced his sup­port for “per­son­hood” le­gis­la­tion, which would grant fer­til­ized eggs the same leg­al pro­tec­tions as people. The con­gress­man said he did so be­cause he came to real­ize that such a law would also ban some types of con­tra­cep­tion.

Demo­crats de­ride Gard­ner’s switch as one born not of con­vic­tion but polit­ic­al op­por­tunism; re­gard­less, there’s little doubt that op­pos­ing such a meas­ure is help­ful in the state: Col­or­ado voters over­whelm­ingly re­jec­ted a bal­lot ini­ti­at­ive on per­son­hood in 2010.

“Ken Buck had the lead go­ing in­to Oc­to­ber, and he ended up los­ing be­cause he said some things that made him un­ac­cept­able to enough Re­pub­lic­an and un­af­fili­ated wo­men in the sub­urbs that they voted for Sen­at­or Ben­net,” said Dick Wadhams, a GOP strategist in Col­or­ado.

So­cial is­sues, es­pe­cially abor­tion rights and ac­cess to con­tra­cep­tion, have been a ma­jor part of the Demo­crat­ic play­book in blue states, and by and large the tac­tic has been ef­fect­ive. Ud­all’s cam­paign has made clear in the early go­ing that it will con­tin­ue to pound Gard­ner’s po­s­i­tion on per­son­hood le­gis­la­tion even after his re­versal.

“Con­gress­man Gard­ner’s ef­forts to hide his real agenda from Col­oradans is af­firm­a­tion of what we’ve been say­ing all along, that he doesn’t share main­stream Col­or­ado val­ues,” said Chris Har­ris, spokes­man for the cam­paign. “Voters will see that he’s not who he says he is.”

Gard­ner’s cam­paign, for its part, is fo­cus­ing on is­sues like the eco­nomy and Obama­care. Lately it’s also pushed Ud­all on wheth­er he backs a pos­sible statewide meas­ure to ban the drilling pro­cess known as frack­ing, a meas­ure that puts the sen­at­or between his lib­er­al base and main­stream voters.

What We're Following See More »
SHE IS AMBASSADOR TO CANADA AND A GOP DONOR
Kelly Craft Nominated for UN Post
3 hours ago
THE LATEST
CRITICS CALL RULE "AN INDIRECT WAY TO DEFUND PLANNED PARENTHOOD"
Trump Blocks Federal Funding to Groups that Make Abortion Referrals
7 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The Trump administration took aim at Planned Parenthood Friday, issuing a rule barring groups that provide abortions or abortion referrals from participating in the $286 million federal family planning program — a move that is expected to direct millions toward faith-based providers."

Source:
SENATE MUST THEN VOTE ON MEASURE WITHIN 18 DAYS
House Expects Tuesday Vote to End National Emergency
11 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The House plans to vote Tuesday on legislation to formally block President Donald Trump’s attempt to circumvent Congress to fund his border wall, Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced Friday. The privileged resolution to stop Trump’s emergency declaration — which has 226 co-sponsors, including one Republican — is expected to easily pass the House. It then will be voted in the Senate within 18 days."

Source:
AVOIDS SHUTDOWN WITH A FEW HOURS TO SPARE
Trump Signs Border Deal
1 weeks ago
THE LATEST

"President Trump signed a sweeping spending bill Friday afternoon, averting another partial government shutdown. The action came after Trump had declared a national emergency in a move designed to circumvent Congress and build additional barriers at the southern border, where he said the United States faces 'an invasion of our country.'"

Source:
REDIRECTS $8 BILLION
Trump Declares National Emergency
1 weeks ago
THE DETAILS

"President Donald Trump on Friday declared a state of emergency on the southern border and immediately direct $8 billion to construct or repair as many as 234 miles of a border barrier. The move — which is sure to invite vigorous legal challenges from activists and government officials — comes after Trump failed to get the $5.7 billion he was seeking from lawmakers. Instead, Trump agreed to sign a deal that included just $1.375 for border security."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login