Supreme Court Declines Review of NSA Phone Spying

Activists protest the surveillance of U.S. citizens by the NSA outside the Justice Department where President Barack Obama gave a major speech on reforming the NSA January 17, 2014.
National Journal
Dustin Volz
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Dustin Volz
April 7, 2014, 6:17 a.m.

The Su­preme Court on Monday op­ted to not take up the con­sti­tu­tion­al­ity of the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency’s sur­veil­lance pro­gram that col­lects bulk tele­phone data of mil­lions of Amer­ic­ans, a de­cision that ar­rives as the oth­er two branches of gov­ern­ment are mov­ing for­ward with re­forms to the con­tro­ver­sial prac­tice.

The deni­al leaves in place a lower-court rul­ing late last year that de­scribed the NSA’s col­lec­tion of phone “metadata” — such as call times and phone num­bers but not the con­tent of con­ver­sa­tions — as “al­most Or­wellian” and a likely breach of the Fourth Amend­ment. Oth­er fed­er­al judges have deemed the pro­gram leg­al.

Law­yer and con­ser­vat­ive act­iv­ist Larry Klay­man had chosen to take his case dir­ectly to the Su­preme Court after Dis­trict Judge Richard Le­on’s high-pro­file Decem­ber de­cision, an un­usu­al move that by­passed the Ap­peals Court, on grounds the case was of im­me­di­ate, press­ing con­cern to the pub­lic.

But the Su­preme Court re­jec­ted Klay­man’s re­quest Monday by fail­ing to grant the case cer­ti­or­ari, a pro­cess that re­quires four of the nine justices to agree a pe­ti­tion mer­its the court’s full re­view.

The Court’s de­cision to not im­me­di­ately go ahead with a re­view of the NSA’s con­tro­ver­sial sur­veil­lance pro­gram ex­posed by Ed­ward Snowden last year means that any changes to it will — for the time be­ing — go through Con­gress and Pres­id­ent Obama, who has already an­nounced a pro­pos­al that would re­quire tele­phone com­pan­ies, rather than the gov­ern­ment, to re­tain the vast data­base of phone re­cords. To ac­cess that data, the NSA would need to first ob­tain an or­der from the For­eign In­tel­li­gence Sur­veil­lance Court, al­though the agency could by­pass the court in emer­gency situ­ations.

Obama has said the pro­gram will con­tin­ue in its cur­rent state un­til Con­gress passes le­gis­la­tion that closely re­sembles his pro­pos­al. A bill in­tro­duced last month by House In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee Chair­man Mike Ro­gers and Rep. Dutch Rup­pers­ber­ger, the pan­el’s top Demo­crat, echoes Obama’s plan, but would al­low the NSA to force com­pan­ies to turn over par­tic­u­lar re­cords that would be go through court re­view after the fact.

But even as law­makers and the pres­id­ent have weighed sur­veil­lance re­forms, some have urged the ju­di­cial branch to help re­solve the is­sue.

“My hope is that the Su­preme Court will take this case,” Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee Chair­wo­man Di­anne Fein­stein, a vo­cal de­fend­er of the in­tel­li­gence com­munity, said fol­low­ing Le­on’s high-pro­file “Or­wellian” rul­ing last year.

The Su­preme Court can still choose to con­sider cases in­volving the NSA’s sur­veil­lance activ­it­ies, but Monday’s de­cision re­af­firms ex­pect­a­tions that the justices would rather al­low the is­sue to per­col­ate with­in the cir­cuit courts first.

What We're Following See More »
TRUMP CONTINUES TO LAWYER UP
Kasowitz Out, John Dowd In
1 days ago
THE LATEST

As the Russia investigation heats up, "the role of Marc E. Kasowitz, the president’s longtime New York lawyer, will be significantly reduced. Mr. Trump liked Mr. Kasowitz’s blunt, aggressive style, but he was not a natural fit in the delicate, politically charged criminal investigation. The veteran Washington defense lawyer John Dowd will take the lead in representing Mr. Trump for the Russia inquiry."

Source:
ALSO INQUIRES ABOUT PARDON POWER
Trump Looking to Discredit Mueller
1 days ago
THE LATEST

President Trump's attorneys are "actively compiling a list of Mueller’s alleged potential conflicts of interest, which they say could serve as a way to stymie his work." They plan to argued that Mueller is going outside the scope of his investigation, in inquiring into Trump's finances. They're also playing small ball, highlighting "donations to Democrats by some of" Mueller's team, and "an allegation that Mueller and Trump National Golf Club in Northern Virginia had a dispute over membership fees when Mueller resigned as a member in 2011." Trump is said to be incensed that Mueller may see his tax returns, and has been asking about his power to pardon his family members.

Source:
INCLUDES NY PROBE INTO MANAFORT
Why Yes, Mueller Is Looking into Trump Businesses
1 days ago
THE LATEST

In addition to ties between Russia and the Trump campaign, Robert Mueller's team is also "examining a broad range of transactions involving Trump’s businesses as well as those of his associates, according to a person familiar with the probe. FBI investigators and others are looking at Russian purchases of apartments in Trump buildings, Trump’s involvement in a controversial SoHo development in New York with Russian associates, the 2013 Miss Universe pageant in Moscow, and Trump’s sale of a Florida mansion to a Russian oligarch in 2008, the person said. The investigation also has absorbed a money-laundering probe begun by federal prosecutors in New York into Trump’s former campaign chairman Paul Manafort."

Source:
Mueller Expands Probe to Trump Business Transactions
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team is "is examining a broad range of transactions involving Trump’s businesses as well as those of his associates", including "Russian purchases of apartments in Trump buildings, Trump’s involvement in a controversial SoHo development with Russian associates, the 2013 Miss Universe pageant in Moscow and Trump’s sale of a Florida mansion to a Russian oligarch in 2008."

Source:
ANALYSIS FROM CBO
32 Million More Uninsured by 2026 if Obamacare Repealed
1 days ago
THE LATEST

"A Senate bill to gut Obamacare would increase the number of uninsured people by 32 million and double premiums on Obamacare's exchanges by 2026, according to an analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. The analysis is of a bill that passed Congress in 2015 that would repeal Obamacare's taxes and some of the mandates. Republicans intend to leave Obamacare in place for two years while a replacement is crafted and implemented."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login