Supreme Court Declines Review of NSA Phone Spying

Activists protest the surveillance of U.S. citizens by the NSA outside the Justice Department where President Barack Obama gave a major speech on reforming the NSA January 17, 2014.
National Journal
Dustin Volz
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Dustin Volz
April 7, 2014, 6:17 a.m.

The Su­preme Court on Monday op­ted to not take up the con­sti­tu­tion­al­ity of the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency’s sur­veil­lance pro­gram that col­lects bulk tele­phone data of mil­lions of Amer­ic­ans, a de­cision that ar­rives as the oth­er two branches of gov­ern­ment are mov­ing for­ward with re­forms to the con­tro­ver­sial prac­tice.

The deni­al leaves in place a lower-court rul­ing late last year that de­scribed the NSA’s col­lec­tion of phone “metadata” — such as call times and phone num­bers but not the con­tent of con­ver­sa­tions — as “al­most Or­wellian” and a likely breach of the Fourth Amend­ment. Oth­er fed­er­al judges have deemed the pro­gram leg­al.

Law­yer and con­ser­vat­ive act­iv­ist Larry Klay­man had chosen to take his case dir­ectly to the Su­preme Court after Dis­trict Judge Richard Le­on’s high-pro­file Decem­ber de­cision, an un­usu­al move that by­passed the Ap­peals Court, on grounds the case was of im­me­di­ate, press­ing con­cern to the pub­lic.

But the Su­preme Court re­jec­ted Klay­man’s re­quest Monday by fail­ing to grant the case cer­ti­or­ari, a pro­cess that re­quires four of the nine justices to agree a pe­ti­tion mer­its the court’s full re­view.

The Court’s de­cision to not im­me­di­ately go ahead with a re­view of the NSA’s con­tro­ver­sial sur­veil­lance pro­gram ex­posed by Ed­ward Snowden last year means that any changes to it will — for the time be­ing — go through Con­gress and Pres­id­ent Obama, who has already an­nounced a pro­pos­al that would re­quire tele­phone com­pan­ies, rather than the gov­ern­ment, to re­tain the vast data­base of phone re­cords. To ac­cess that data, the NSA would need to first ob­tain an or­der from the For­eign In­tel­li­gence Sur­veil­lance Court, al­though the agency could by­pass the court in emer­gency situ­ations.

Obama has said the pro­gram will con­tin­ue in its cur­rent state un­til Con­gress passes le­gis­la­tion that closely re­sembles his pro­pos­al. A bill in­tro­duced last month by House In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee Chair­man Mike Ro­gers and Rep. Dutch Rup­pers­ber­ger, the pan­el’s top Demo­crat, echoes Obama’s plan, but would al­low the NSA to force com­pan­ies to turn over par­tic­u­lar re­cords that would be go through court re­view after the fact.

But even as law­makers and the pres­id­ent have weighed sur­veil­lance re­forms, some have urged the ju­di­cial branch to help re­solve the is­sue.

“My hope is that the Su­preme Court will take this case,” Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee Chair­wo­man Di­anne Fein­stein, a vo­cal de­fend­er of the in­tel­li­gence com­munity, said fol­low­ing Le­on’s high-pro­file “Or­wellian” rul­ing last year.

The Su­preme Court can still choose to con­sider cases in­volving the NSA’s sur­veil­lance activ­it­ies, but Monday’s de­cision re­af­firms ex­pect­a­tions that the justices would rather al­low the is­sue to per­col­ate with­in the cir­cuit courts first.

What We're Following See More »
ANOTHER NUCLEAR OPTION?
Byrd Rule Could Trip Up Health Legislation
19 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”

Source:
ONE WEEK
Senate Votes To Fund Government
21 hours ago
BREAKING
ON TO SENATE
House Passes Spending Bill
22 hours ago
BREAKING

The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.

PRESIDENT CALLS MEDICAID FUNDS A “BAILOUT”
Puerto Rico Another Sticking Point in Budget Talks
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."

Source:
POTENTIAL GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN?
Democrats Threaten Spending Bill Over Obamacare
1 days ago
BREAKING

Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login