Supreme Court Declines Review of NSA Phone Spying

Activists protest the surveillance of U.S. citizens by the NSA outside the Justice Department where President Barack Obama gave a major speech on reforming the NSA January 17, 2014.
National Journal
Dustin Volz
April 7, 2014, 6:17 a.m.

The Su­preme Court on Monday op­ted to not take up the con­sti­tu­tion­al­ity of the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency’s sur­veil­lance pro­gram that col­lects bulk tele­phone data of mil­lions of Amer­ic­ans, a de­cision that ar­rives as the oth­er two branches of gov­ern­ment are mov­ing for­ward with re­forms to the con­tro­ver­sial prac­tice.

The deni­al leaves in place a lower-court rul­ing late last year that de­scribed the NSA’s col­lec­tion of phone “metadata” — such as call times and phone num­bers but not the con­tent of con­ver­sa­tions — as “al­most Or­wellian” and a likely breach of the Fourth Amend­ment. Oth­er fed­er­al judges have deemed the pro­gram leg­al.

Law­yer and con­ser­vat­ive act­iv­ist Larry Klay­man had chosen to take his case dir­ectly to the Su­preme Court after Dis­trict Judge Richard Le­on’s high-pro­file Decem­ber de­cision, an un­usu­al move that by­passed the Ap­peals Court, on grounds the case was of im­me­di­ate, press­ing con­cern to the pub­lic.

But the Su­preme Court re­jec­ted Klay­man’s re­quest Monday by fail­ing to grant the case cer­ti­or­ari, a pro­cess that re­quires four of the nine justices to agree a pe­ti­tion mer­its the court’s full re­view.

The Court’s de­cision to not im­me­di­ately go ahead with a re­view of the NSA’s con­tro­ver­sial sur­veil­lance pro­gram ex­posed by Ed­ward Snowden last year means that any changes to it will — for the time be­ing — go through Con­gress and Pres­id­ent Obama, who has already an­nounced a pro­pos­al that would re­quire tele­phone com­pan­ies, rather than the gov­ern­ment, to re­tain the vast data­base of phone re­cords. To ac­cess that data, the NSA would need to first ob­tain an or­der from the For­eign In­tel­li­gence Sur­veil­lance Court, al­though the agency could by­pass the court in emer­gency situ­ations.

Obama has said the pro­gram will con­tin­ue in its cur­rent state un­til Con­gress passes le­gis­la­tion that closely re­sembles his pro­pos­al. A bill in­tro­duced last month by House In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee Chair­man Mike Ro­gers and Rep. Dutch Rup­pers­ber­ger, the pan­el’s top Demo­crat, echoes Obama’s plan, but would al­low the NSA to force com­pan­ies to turn over par­tic­u­lar re­cords that would be go through court re­view after the fact.

But even as law­makers and the pres­id­ent have weighed sur­veil­lance re­forms, some have urged the ju­di­cial branch to help re­solve the is­sue.

“My hope is that the Su­preme Court will take this case,” Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee Chair­wo­man Di­anne Fein­stein, a vo­cal de­fend­er of the in­tel­li­gence com­munity, said fol­low­ing Le­on’s high-pro­file “Or­wellian” rul­ing last year.

The Su­preme Court can still choose to con­sider cases in­volving the NSA’s sur­veil­lance activ­it­ies, but Monday’s de­cision re­af­firms ex­pect­a­tions that the justices would rather al­low the is­sue to per­col­ate with­in the cir­cuit courts first.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×