The Supreme Court on Monday opted to not take up the constitutionality of the National Security Agency’s surveillance program that collects bulk telephone data of millions of Americans, a decision that arrives as the other two branches of government are moving forward with reforms to the controversial practice.
The denial leaves in place a lower-court ruling late last year that described the NSA’s collection of phone “metadata” — such as call times and phone numbers but not the content of conversations — as “almost Orwellian” and a likely breach of the Fourth Amendment. Other federal judges have deemed the program legal.
Lawyer and conservative activist Larry Klayman had chosen to take his case directly to the Supreme Court after District Judge Richard Leon’s high-profile December decision, an unusual move that bypassed the Appeals Court, on grounds the case was of immediate, pressing concern to the public.
But the Supreme Court rejected Klayman’s request Monday by failing to grant the case certiorari, a process that requires four of the nine justices to agree a petition merits the court’s full review.
The Court’s decision to not immediately go ahead with a review of the NSA’s controversial surveillance program exposed by Edward Snowden last year means that any changes to it will — for the time being — go through Congress and President Obama, who has already announced a proposal that would require telephone companies, rather than the government, to retain the vast database of phone records. To access that data, the NSA would need to first obtain an order from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, although the agency could bypass the court in emergency situations.
Obama has said the program will continue in its current state until Congress passes legislation that closely resembles his proposal. A bill introduced last month by House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers and Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger, the panel’s top Democrat, echoes Obama’s plan, but would allow the NSA to force companies to turn over particular records that would be go through court review after the fact.
But even as lawmakers and the president have weighed surveillance reforms, some have urged the judicial branch to help resolve the issue.
“My hope is that the Supreme Court will take this case,” Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein, a vocal defender of the intelligence community, said following Leon’s high-profile “Orwellian” ruling last year.
The Supreme Court can still choose to consider cases involving the NSA’s surveillance activities, but Monday’s decision reaffirms expectations that the justices would rather allow the issue to percolate within the circuit courts first.
What We're Following See More »
The National Defense Authorization Act passed the House this morning by a 375-34 vote. The bill, which heads to the Senate next week for final consideration, would fund the military to the tune of $618.7 billion, "about $3.2 billion more than the president requested for fiscal 2017. ... The White House has issued a veto threat on both the House and Senate-passed versions of the bill, but has not yet said if it will sign the compromise bill released by the conference committee this week."
"Republicans have elected Rep. Greg Walden (R-OR) the next chairman of the powerful House Energy and Commerce Committee. Walden defeated Reps. John Shimkus (R-IL) and Joe Barton (R-TX), the former committee chairman, in the race for the gavel" to succeed Michgan's Fred Upton.
"Democratic and Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee are working on legislation that would limit deportations" under President-elect Donald Trump. Leading the effort are Judiciary Committee members Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC). Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) is also expected to sign on.
Donald Trump has selected retired Marine Gen. James 'Mad Dog' Mattis as his secretary of defense, according to The Washington Post. Mattis retired from active duty just four years ago, so Congress will have "to pass new legislation to bypass a federal law that states secretaries of defense must not have been on active duty in the previous seven years." The official announcement is likely to come next week.