Americans Can’t Buy the Top-Notch Sunscreen That Europeans Have Been Using for Years

The best sunburn protections are blocked by a federal backlog, but Congress is pushing legislation it says will clear the way.

National Journal
Sophie Novack
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Sophie Novack
April 7, 2014, 10:04 a.m.

Sun­screens that have been avail­able in Europe and oth­er for­eign mar­kets for years re­main banned from U.S. stores be­cause of a back­log in the fed­er­al bur­eau­cracy.

The in­gredi­ents that make the sun­screen su­per­i­or have been await­ing ap­prov­al — or any sort of de­cision — from the Food and Drug Ad­min­is­tra­tion for at least 12 years. There are cur­rently eight such in­gredi­ents stuck in the sys­tem.

Without ac­cess to the in­gredi­ents, con­sumers may be blocked from buy­ing the sun­screens that provide the most ef­fect­ive pro­tec­tions against harm­ful rays.

Con­gress has a plan to break the 12-year back­log: The House En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee on Monday is look­ing at le­gis­la­tion that would ex­ped­ite the FDA’s ap­prov­al pro­cess for sun­screen in­gredi­ents. Should the pan­el ap­prov­al the meas­ure, it would put the bill one step closer to pas­sage.

A com­pan­ion ver­sion of the House bill is pending with the Sen­ate’s Health Com­mit­tee.

The le­gis­la­tion aims to im­prove on the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment’s latest at­tempt to make it­self more nimble in keep­ing up with sun­block tech­no­logy: a 2002 pro­ced­ur­al change from the FDA that the agency hoped would speed up its ap­prov­al pro­cess.

But without a single in­gredi­ent be­ing ap­proved since then, ad­voc­ates say it’s time for an­oth­er try.

“FDA’s goal was to cre­ate a more stream­lined pro­cess; it just didn’t work out that way,” says a staff mem­ber of the Pub­lic Ac­cess to Sun­Screens Co­ali­tion. “Every­one — melan­oma re­search­ers, the com­munity, man­u­fac­tur­ers, pa­tients, even the FDA — every­one agrees the cur­rent situ­ation is not work­ing. When you com­bine that with the in­creas­ing rates of skin can­cer, it’s a ser­i­ous pub­lic-health con­cern.”

At stake is more than sun­burns: Skin can­cer is the most com­mon form of can­cer in the United States. more than 2 mil­lion cases are dia­gnosed each year, many of which could be pre­ven­ted by pro­tect­ing the skin from sun ex­pos­ure, ac­cord­ing to the Amer­ic­an Can­cer So­ci­ety.

Con­gres­sion­al ad­voc­ates hope they can im­prove the FDA’s ex­ist­ing pro­ced­ure without upend­ing the en­tire sys­tem.

Un­der cur­rent law, if an in­gredi­ent is on the mar­ket in an­oth­er coun­try for five years, it may go through a pro­cess to be de­term­ined eli­gible by the FDA. An ad­vis­ory com­mit­tee of ex­perts then weighs in on the safety and ef­fect­ive­ness of the product, and the agency makes the fi­nal de­term­in­a­tion as to wheth­er it is ap­proved.

The Sun­screen In­nov­a­tion Act makes two primary changes to this pro­cess. First, it would in­sti­tute an eight-month dead­line for the FDA to make a de­cision, re­pla­cing a cur­rent re­view pro­cess that lacks a man­dat­ory end date. Second, the bill would no longer re­quire the FDA to is­sue a reg­u­la­tion every time it wants to ap­prove an in­gredi­ent.

The FDA de­clined to com­ment on the bill, but a spokes­per­son said the agency has “pri­or­it­ized re­view­ing the safety and ef­fect­ive­ness of ad­di­tion­al sun­screen in­gredi­ents as quickly as pos­sible giv­en the agency’s re­sources.”

This frus­tra­tion has boiled over to Cap­it­ol Hill, with match­ing House and Sen­ate bills to ad­dress the prob­lem. The House ver­sion be­ing con­sidered Monday was in­tro­duced by Re­pub­lic­an Ed Whit­field and Demo­crat John Din­gell. The Sen­ate ver­sion came from Demo­crat Jack Reed and Re­pub­lic­an Johnny Isak­son.

With back­ing from both parties, ad­voc­ates are cau­tiously op­tim­ist­ic about the bills be­com­ing law, but they re­cog­nize that bi­par­tis­an sup­port is no guar­an­tee of pas­sage — par­tic­u­larly in the cur­rent grid­locked en­vir­on­ment.

“Try­ing to pre­dict what Con­gress is go­ing to do is kind of like hav­ing a per­fect March Mad­ness brack­et,” the sun­screens co­ali­tion staff mem­ber said. “But I will say there has been tre­mend­ous bi­par­tis­an, bicam­er­al sup­port.”

What We're Following See More »
ARE “OPEN TO NEGOTIATION”
Sens. Paul, Cruz, Johnson and Lee Oppose Senate Health Care Bill
4 hours ago
THE LATEST

The four Senators released a joint statement, saying in part, "There are provisions in this draft that repreesnt an improvement to our current health care system, but it does not appear this draft as written will accomplish the most important promise we made to Americans: to repeal Obamacare and lower their health care costs."

Source:
UNKNOWN IF TRUMP WANTS 2024 GAMES IN L.A.
Trump Meets With International Olympic Committee Today
4 hours ago
THE LATEST

"President Trump will meet with the International Olympic Committee Thursday amid a battle between Los Angeles and Paris for the right to host the 2024 games. The meeting at the White House will come roughly three months before members of the IOC vote on which of the two cities will welcome the Olympics during what could be the final year of Trump's presidency, should he win re-election. Trump has remained largely silent on whether he plans to fight for the U.S. to receive the games in 2024."

Source:
TRUMP SUGGESTED THERE WERE TAPES
No Comey Tapes
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

Trump tweeted Thursday afternoon, "With all of the recently reported electronic surveillance, intercepts, unmasking and illegal leaking of information, I have no idea whether there are "tapes" or recordings of my conversations with James Comey, but I did not make, and do not have, any such recordings."

Source:
DEVELOPING
Senate Healthcare Bill In Trouble?
6 hours ago
BREAKING
ALTERED, STOLE VOTER INFO
Russian Hacking More Extensive Than Previously Reported
6 hours ago
BREAKING

"The hacking of state and local election databases in 2016 was more extensive than previously reported, including at least one successful attempt to alter voter information, and the theft of thousands of voter records that contain private information like partial Social Security numbers. ... Congressional investigators are probing whether any of this stolen private information made its way to the Trump campaign. ... The House Intelligence Committee plans to seek testimony this summer from Brad Parscale, the digital director of the Trump campaign."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login