The Federal Government Is Charging With Deceiving Customers

FTC says the social-networking site secretly took information from Facebook to create user profiles.

National Journal
Laura Ryan
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Laura Ryan
April 7, 2014, 11:26 a.m.

The so­cial-net­work­ing site secretly took in­form­a­tion from Face­book to la­bel mil­lions “a jerk” and “not a jerk,” the Fed­er­al Trade Com­mis­sion said Monday.

FTC is seek­ing an or­der to stop from us­ing im­prop­erly ob­tained per­son­al in­form­a­tion and to re­quire the web­site to de­lete the in­form­a­tion. An ad­min­is­trat­ive judge will hear the case next Janu­ary.

In what FTC called a “brazen at­tempt to ex­ploit” peoples’ con­cerns about their on­line repu­ta­tion, the con­sumer-pro­tec­tion agency charged and its op­er­at­or, Nap­ster cofounder John Fan­ning, with de­ceiv­ing more than 73 mil­lion con­sumers.

Between 2009 and 2013, the FTC says, mil­lions of Amer­ic­ans searched them­selves on search en­gines to find out that they had been labeled either a “Jerk” or “not a jerk” on Adding in­sult to in­jury, the web­site told con­sumers that they would have to pay a fee to re­vise their pro­file.

Vis­it­ors to the site be­lieved that that their pro­files were made by oth­er users, but most pro­files were ac­tu­ally cre­ated from in­form­a­tion har­ves­ted sur­repti­tiously from Face­book, ac­cord­ing to the FTC.

Ad­di­tion­ally, the agency said that the site told con­sumers that they could pay $30 to amend their pro­file or $25 to con­tact cus­tom­er ser­vice, but those who did shell out money “re­ceived noth­ing” in ex­change for their pay­ment.

Pro­files in­cluded pho­tos and de­tailed per­son­al in­form­a­tion, in­clud­ing name, ad­dress, con­tact in­form­a­tion, and even So­cial Se­cur­ity num­bers in some cases. also let users vote on wheth­er or not a per­son was a jerk and al­lowed for per­son­al com­ments on user pro­files. Com­ments were gen­er­ally un­kind, such as, “Omg I hate this kid he’s such a loser,” and, “Nobody in their right mind would love you “¦ not even your par­ents love [you].”

What We're Following See More »
Byrd Rule Could Trip Up Health Legislation
19 hours ago

"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”

Senate Votes To Fund Government
21 hours ago
House Passes Spending Bill
22 hours ago

The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.

Puerto Rico Another Sticking Point in Budget Talks
1 days ago

President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."

Democrats Threaten Spending Bill Over Obamacare
1 days ago

Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.