The Federal Government Is Charging With Deceiving Customers

FTC says the social-networking site secretly took information from Facebook to create user profiles.

National Journal
Laura Ryan
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Laura Ryan
April 7, 2014, 11:26 a.m.

The so­cial-net­work­ing site secretly took in­form­a­tion from Face­book to la­bel mil­lions “a jerk” and “not a jerk,” the Fed­er­al Trade Com­mis­sion said Monday.

FTC is seek­ing an or­der to stop from us­ing im­prop­erly ob­tained per­son­al in­form­a­tion and to re­quire the web­site to de­lete the in­form­a­tion. An ad­min­is­trat­ive judge will hear the case next Janu­ary.

In what FTC called a “brazen at­tempt to ex­ploit” peoples’ con­cerns about their on­line repu­ta­tion, the con­sumer-pro­tec­tion agency charged and its op­er­at­or, Nap­ster cofounder John Fan­ning, with de­ceiv­ing more than 73 mil­lion con­sumers.

Between 2009 and 2013, the FTC says, mil­lions of Amer­ic­ans searched them­selves on search en­gines to find out that they had been labeled either a “Jerk” or “not a jerk” on Adding in­sult to in­jury, the web­site told con­sumers that they would have to pay a fee to re­vise their pro­file.

Vis­it­ors to the site be­lieved that that their pro­files were made by oth­er users, but most pro­files were ac­tu­ally cre­ated from in­form­a­tion har­ves­ted sur­repti­tiously from Face­book, ac­cord­ing to the FTC.

Ad­di­tion­ally, the agency said that the site told con­sumers that they could pay $30 to amend their pro­file or $25 to con­tact cus­tom­er ser­vice, but those who did shell out money “re­ceived noth­ing” in ex­change for their pay­ment.

Pro­files in­cluded pho­tos and de­tailed per­son­al in­form­a­tion, in­clud­ing name, ad­dress, con­tact in­form­a­tion, and even So­cial Se­cur­ity num­bers in some cases. also let users vote on wheth­er or not a per­son was a jerk and al­lowed for per­son­al com­ments on user pro­files. Com­ments were gen­er­ally un­kind, such as, “Omg I hate this kid he’s such a loser,” and, “Nobody in their right mind would love you “¦ not even your par­ents love [you].”

What We're Following See More »
Cruz to Back Trump
1 days ago
Two Polls for Clinton, One for Trump
1 days ago

With three days until the first debate, the polls are coming fast and furious. The latest round:

  • An Associated Press/Gfk poll of registered voters found very few voters committed, with Clin­ton lead­ing Trump, 37% to 29%, and Gary John­son at 7%.
  • A Mc­Clatchy-Mar­ist poll gave Clin­ton a six-point edge, 45% to 39%, in a four-way bal­lot test. Johnson pulls 10% support, with Jill Stein at 4%.
  • Rasmussen, which has drawn criticism for continually showing Donald Trump doing much better than he does in other polls, is at it again. A new survey gives Trump a five-point lead, 44%-39%.
Trump Eschewing Briefing Materials in Debate Prep
1 days ago

In contrast to Hillary Clinton's meticulous debate practice sessions, Donald Trump "is largely shun­ning tra­di­tion­al de­bate pre­par­a­tions, but has been watch­ing video of…Clin­ton’s best and worst de­bate mo­ments, look­ing for her vul­ner­ab­il­it­ies.” Trump “has paid only curs­ory at­ten­tion to brief­ing ma­ter­i­als. He has re­fused to use lecterns in mock de­bate ses­sions des­pite the ur­ging of his ad­visers. He prefers spit­balling ideas with his team rather than hon­ing them in­to crisp, two-minute an­swers.”

Trump Makes No Outreach to Spanish Speakers
1 days ago

Donald Trump "is on the precipice of becoming the only major-party presidential candidate this century not to reach out to millions of American voters whose dominant, first or just preferred language is Spanish. Trump has not only failed to buy any Spanish-language television or radio ads, he so far has avoided even offering a translation of his website into Spanish, breaking with two decades of bipartisan tradition."

Clintons Buy the House Next Door in Chappaqua
2 days ago

Bill and Hillary Clinton have purchased the home next door to their primary residence in tony Chappaqua, New York, for $1.16 million. "By purchasing the new home, the Clinton's now own the entire cul-de-sac at the end of the road in the leafy New York suburb. The purchase makes it easier for the United States Secret Service to protect the former president and possible future commander in chief."