Free-Speech War Over Mozilla Ouster Enters Congress

Conservatives are hoping to make Brendan Eich a martyr for free speech, a la Duck Dynasty’s Phil Robertson.

National Journal
Add to Briefcase
Dustin Volz
April 7, 2014, 11:59 a.m.

Brendan Eich’s resig­na­tion from Moz­illa is quickly be­com­ing a Duck Dyn­asty-styl­ized talk­ing point for con­ser­vat­ive politi­cians prone to de­cry­ing the choice of polit­ic­al cor­rect­ness over free­dom of speech.

As dur­ing the scan­dal late last year that en­vel­oped Phil Robertson, the A&E real­ity-tele­vi­sion star whose in­fam­ously crude, ho­mo­phobic re­marks left his show briefly sus­pen­ded, some politi­cians are at­tempt­ing to lever­age Eich’s de­par­ture, claim­ing it rep­res­ents an iron­ic kind of in­tol­er­ance from the grow­ing gay-rights move­ment.

On Monday, Rep. Frank Wolf took to the House floor to air his griev­ances over Eich’s resig­na­tion.

“Re­gard­less of your views on mar­riage, any Amer­ic­an who val­ues the First Amend­ment should be deeply troubled that this man was es­sen­tially driv­en from his job be­cause of his per­son­al be­liefs,” the Vir­gin­ia Re­pub­lic­an said. “By all ac­counts, he’s a fair and hon­or­able em­ploy­er, yet be­cause of his private be­liefs about tra­di­tion­al mar­riage, which I share, he has been de­mon­ized and his live­li­hood has been com­prom­ised.”

Wolf con­tin­ued: “Pub­lic opin­ion on gay mar­riage has shif­ted since 2008, when both then-pres­id­en­tial can­did­ates Barack Obama and John Mc­Cain sup­por­ted de­fin­ing mar­riage as the uni­on of one man and one wo­man — but Amer­ica has nev­er been defined by mob rule.”

Eich chose to step down as CEO last Thursday fol­low­ing protests against him for his $1,000 dona­tion to a 2008 anti-gay-mar­riage meas­ure in Cali­for­nia. Moz­illa had ap­poin­ted Eich, who cofoun­ded the com­pany, to the ex­ec­ut­ive po­s­i­tion just a week earli­er be­fore its sud­den about-face, which Moz­illa Chair­wo­man Mitchell Baker de­scribed as the best thing “for Moz­illa and our com­munity.”

Wolf went on to say that the the fur­or last week, which in­cluded a de facto ban of Moz­illa’s Fire­fox web browser on the on­line-dat­ing site Ok­Cu­pid, vi­ol­ated the First Amend­ment’s guar­an­tee of free­dom of speech and “was stifling of de­bate, a si­len­cing of dis­sent.”

Wolf isn’t the only politi­cian sound­ing the free-speech alarms so far. Over the week­end, former House Speak­er Newt Gin­grich said Eich was forced to leave Moz­illa due to a “new fas­cism” tak­ing over parts of cor­por­ate Amer­ica that means “[if] you have the wrong views, mean­ing con­ser­vat­ive, you have no ca­reer.”

The Duck Dyn­asty con­tro­versy grew so large last Decem­ber that it evoked re­sponses from pos­sible Re­pub­lic­an can­did­ates for the pres­id­ency, in­clud­ing Louisi­ana Gov. Bobby Jin­dal and Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, as well as one­time vice pres­id­en­tial can­did­ate Sarah Pal­in and, even­tu­ally, even Pres­id­ent Obama.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.