Comcast Promises Faster Internet If Government OKs Deal

The cable giant makes the case for its purchase of Time Warner Cable.

National Journal
Brendan Sasso
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Brendan Sasso
April 8, 2014, 7:13 a.m.

Mil­lions of con­sumers around the coun­try will be able to stream high­er qual­ity videos and browse the Web more quickly if reg­u­lat­ors al­low Com­cast to buy Time Warner Cable, the com­pan­ies said Tues­day.

The cable pro­viders made the case for their $45.2 bil­lion mer­ger in an of­fi­cial ap­plic­a­tion to the Fed­er­al Com­mu­nic­a­tions Com­mis­sion. The Justice De­part­ment will also in­vest­ig­ate wheth­er the mer­ger of the na­tion’s top two cable com­pan­ies would vi­ol­ate fair-com­pet­i­tion laws.

In the fil­ing with the FCC, Com­cast said the ac­quis­i­tion will al­low it to up­grade Time Warner Cable’s net­work and make ad­di­tion­al in­vest­ments in its own in­fra­struc­ture. As a res­ult, many cur­rent sub­scribers of both com­pan­ies will en­joy faster In­ter­net ser­vice in the com­ing years, Com­cast prom­ised. 

The pledge is likely to go over well with the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion, which has made en­sur­ing high-speed In­ter­net ac­cess to all Amer­ic­ans a top pri­or­ity.

Com­cast said it will in­def­in­itely ex­tend In­ter­net Es­sen­tials, its low-cost broad­band In­ter­net pro­gram for low-in­come con­sumers. It also prom­ised to ex­pand the num­ber of Wi-Fi hot spots around the coun­try avail­able to its cus­tom­ers. 

To re­ceive per­mis­sion to buy NBC-Uni­ver­sal in 2011, Com­cast prom­ised to fol­low the FCC’s net-neut­ral­ity rules un­til 2018. Be­cause a fed­er­al court struck down the rules earli­er this year, Com­cast is the only com­pany still bound to abide by the reg­u­la­tions, which re­quire In­ter­net pro­viders to treat all traffic equally. In its ap­plic­a­tion, Com­cast prom­ised to ex­tend that ob­lig­a­tion to Time Warner Cable areas.

Com­cast also em­phas­ized that its net­work does not cur­rently over­lap with Time Warner Cable in any mar­ket. As a res­ult, the mer­ger would not lim­it choices for any con­sumers, the com­pany ar­gued.

Com­cast said busi­nesses will likely en­joy lower prices if the deal is ap­proved, but the com­pany did not make any sim­il­ar prom­ise for home con­sumers.

Fifty pub­lic-in­terest groups quickly fired back with their own let­ter to FCC Chair­man Tom Wheel­er and At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Eric Hold­er, call­ing the mer­ger “un­think­able.”

Pub­lic Know­ledge, Free Press, Con­sumers Uni­on, and dozens of oth­er groups ar­gued that Com­cast has raised its ba­sic cable prices in re­cent years, while TWC has ac­tu­ally cut con­sumer costs. But the mer­ger is about more than just prices, the groups wrote — it’s about con­trol of the In­ter­net.

“The Com­cast-Time Warner Cable mer­ger would give Com­cast un­think­able gate­keep­er power over our com­mer­cial, so­cial and civic lives,” they wrote. “Every­one from the biggest busi­ness to the smal­lest star­tup, from elec­ted of­fi­cials to every­day people, would have to cross through Com­cast’s gates.”

Now that Com­cast has filed its of­fi­cial ap­plic­a­tion, the FCC will be­gin to in­vest­ig­ate wheth­er the deal is in the pub­lic’s in­terest. The Justice De­part­ment’s An­ti­trust Di­vi­sion will fo­cus on wheth­er the mer­ger would il­leg­ally lim­it com­pet­i­tion.

The Sen­ate Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee will ex­am­ine the deal at a hear­ing on Wed­nes­day fea­tur­ing testi­mony from Com­cast and Time Warner Cable ex­ec­ut­ives.

What We're Following See More »
PRESIDENT CALLS MEDICAID FUNDS A “BAILOUT”
Puerto Rico Another Sticking Point in Budget Talks
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS

President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."

Source:
SHUT DOWN MISLEADING FALSEHOODS
Facebook To Cut Down On Govt-Sponsored Info Campaigns
1 hours ago
BREAKING

Facebook "outlined new measures it is taking to combat what it calls 'information operations' that go well beyond the phenomenon known as fake news" on Thursday. Facebook acknowledged that there are governments using its platform as a tool to launch propaganda information campaigns and "manipulate public opinion in other countries. ... Facebook suspended 30,000 accounts in France ahead of last Sunday’s first-round presidential election."

Source:
POTENTIAL GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN?
Democrats Threaten Spending Bill Over Obamacare
6 hours ago
BREAKING

Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.

Source:
IN 2014
Pentagon Warned Flynn Not To Accept Foreign Payments
7 hours ago
BREAKING
WOULD PUSH DEADLINE TO MAY 5
One-Week Spending Bill On The Table
8 hours ago
BREAKING

Members of Congress are eyeing a one-week spending bill which would keep the government open past the Friday night deadline, giving lawmakers an extra week to iron out a long-term deal to fund the government. Without any action, the government would run out of funding starting at midnight Saturday. “I am optimistic that a final funding package will be completed soon," said Rep. Rodney Frelinghuysen, R-N.J., chairman of the House Appropriations Committee.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login