Perez: We’re Getting ‘Our Butts Kicked’ on Workforce Investment

The Labor secretary says U.S. spending on public-sector training efforts is lagging.

Secretary of Labor Thomas Perez. 
National Journal
Ronald Brownstein
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Ronald Brownstein
April 10, 2014, 5 p.m.

Labor Sec­ret­ary Thomas Perez sat down earli­er this week with At­lantic Me­dia Ed­it­or­i­al Dir­ect­or Ron­ald Brown­stein to dis­cuss the chal­lenge of up­grad­ing Amer­ic­an work­ers’ skills. Perez spoke at the spring sum­mit for Na­tion­al Journ­al‘s Next Amer­ica pro­ject one day after Pres­id­ent Obama an­nounced a new Youth Ca­reer­Con­nect grant pro­gram to pro­mote the de­vel­op­ment of sec­ond­ary schools, such as New York City’s P-TECH, that com­bine high school and com­munity-col­lege de­grees with work ex­per­i­ence in one ac­cel­er­ated pack­age. Ed­ited ex­cerpts fol­low.

In terms of up­grad­ing skills, what is the re­l­at­ive bal­ance of re­spons­ib­il­ity between the pub­lic sec­tor — and the kinds of pro­grams that you ad­min­is­ter — and the private sec­tor?

I think it’s a part­ner­ship. I spend as much time with [Com­merce Sec­ret­ary] Penny Pritzker as with any­one in the Cab­in­et. We’re try­ing to work with the busi­ness com­munity to un­der­stand not only what the de­mand needs are, but what are the un­der­ly­ing core com­pet­en­cies that are es­sen­tial to meet those de­mand needs and what can we do to scale up cre­den­tials that would be in­dustry-re­cog­nized and would be stack­able [and] port­able.

Do Amer­ic­an em­ploy­ers in­vest enough in train­ing their work­ers?

Amer­ic­an com­pan­ies in­vest quite a bit. But with mid­sized and smal­ler em­ploy­ers, a lot of times they’re not cap­able of hav­ing their own train­ing de­part­ment in a way some­body like Siemens can have. A big part of what we’re try­ing to do is re­cog­nize that we need to build an eco­nom­ic sys­tem that en­ables every­body to get ac­cess [to ef­fect­ive train­ing]. You com­pare the pub­lic-sec­tor in­vest­ment in work­force in the U.S. with oth­er coun­tries and once again we kind of get our butts kicked. A fun­da­ment­al chal­lenge right now for us is to demon­strate more ef­fect­ively the re­turn on in­vest­ment from our pub­lic-work­force sys­tem.

The pres­id­ent just an­nounced the Youth Ca­reer­Con­nect grants. What is the prob­lem you’re try­ing to solve there?

To provide a ca­reer path­way for people that is rel­ev­ant to ex­ist­ing de­mand needs and, in that pro­cess, give people ex­pos­ure to the op­por­tun­it­ies that are out there. At Sarah Goode Academy in Chica­go — this is a STEM academy — I’m guess­ing that 90 per­cent or more of the stu­dents would qual­i­fy for free and re­duced meals. If you ask them, “What did you do last sum­mer?” [they tell you,] “I came to school and I took geo­metry.” Then they were go­ing with their ment­ors at IBM to see what it’s like to be in the work­force. They are aim­ing high. We’ve got to give our kids the op­por­tun­ity to get these ex­per­i­ences that get them aim­ing high.

Do you think these kinds of pro­grams could be a sig­ni­fic­ant con­trib­ut­or to the way kids are edu­cated?

In short: ab­so­lutely. This isn’t a pan­acea, but I think this is a very prom­ising mod­el.

You al­luded to the re­view of fed­er­al job-train­ing pro­grams that Vice Pres­id­ent Joe Biden is con­duct­ing. What should we ex­pect from that?

A blue­print that will en­able us to help more people up-skill and get ac­cess to the in-de­mand jobs that are out there, and [also] ideas for how to scale pro­grams that work. We’ve got a little bit of a tree-fall­ing-in-the-woods chal­lenge be­cause there’s great in­nov­a­tion at loc­al and state levels, but these solu­tions, in my ex­per­i­ence, tend to be re­gion­al. I want to be able to look every­body in the eye and say, “If you’re will­ing to work hard and get the skills to com­pete, we’re go­ing to find that road map for you.”

Why are there so many fed­er­al jobs pro­grams, and do they need to be con­sol­id­ated?

The best way to an­swer that ques­tion is to give you an ex­ample. There are five dif­fer­ent fund­ing streams for vet­er­ans. There are some vets who just need help writ­ing their résumé, and they’re off and run­ning. There’s a fund­ing stream that en­ables us to help vets with dis­ab­il­it­ies. Some vets are home­less. I don’t think of those five fund­ing streams as five pro­grams. I think of these like apps on an iPhone. In some cases, you may need all five of those apps to help them; in some cases, you might just need em­ploy­ment ser­vices. I don’t think the most im­port­ant ques­tion is that num­ber [of pro­grams]. I think the most im­port­ant ques­tion is: What is our op­er­at­ing philo­sophy for how we can meet the de­mand needs of em­ploy­ers and the up-skilling needs of work­ers?

Stephanie Czekalinsk contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
Clinton Foundation Staffers Steered Biz to Bill
1 hours ago

"Two chief fundraisers for the Clinton Foundation pressed corporate donors to steer business opportunities to former President Bill Clinton as well, according to a hacked memo published Wednesday by WikiLeaks. The November 2011 memo from Douglas Band, at the time a top aide to Mr. Clinton, outlines extensive fundraising efforts that Mr. Band and a partner deployed on behalf of the Clinton Foundation and how that work sometimes translated into large speaking fees and other paid work for Mr. Clinton."

Chef Jose Andres Campaigns With Clinton
9 hours ago
White House Weighs in Against Non-Compete Contracts
10 hours ago

"The Obama administration on Tuesday called on U.S. states to ban agreements prohibiting many workers from moving to their employers’ rivals, saying it would lead to a more competitive labor market and faster wage growth. The administration said so-called non-compete agreements interfere with worker mobility and states should consider barring companies from requiring low-wage workers and other employees who are not privy to trade secrets or other special circumstances to sign them."

House Investigators Already Sharpening Their Spears for Clinton
11 hours ago

House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz plans to spend "years, come January, probing the record of a President Hillary Clinton." Chaffetz told the Washington Post: “It’s a target-rich environment. Even before we get to Day One, we’ve got two years’ worth of material already lined up. She has four years of history at the State Department, and it ain’t good.”

Clinton Super PAC Enters the House Fray
15 hours ago

Priorities USA, the super PAC aligned with the Clinton campaign, which has already gotten involved in two Senate races, is now expanding into House races. The group released a 30 second spot which serves to hit Donald Trump and Iowa Rep. Rod Blum, who is in a tough race to win re-election in Iowa's first congressional district. The super PAC's expansion into House and Senate races shows a high level of confidence in Clinton's standing against Trump.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.