It’s not that fun being a member of Congress. People despise what you represent. Americans say they like Nickelback more than Congress — Nickelback, people! You spend much of your time raising money while not much can actually get done, policy-wise. Even you hate where you work.
Add on top of that, the pay ain’t all that grand. Sure, the cash-out from leaving Congress can be fabulous if you head to K Street, but maintaining a D.C. residence in addition to one in your home district can apparently be a bit rough on an annual salary of $174,000. The monthly median rental price for an apartment in D.C. is $2,250, according to Zillow.
So Democratic Rep. Jim Moran of Virginia has a solution to get his coworkers more money to make ends meet: Don’t give members a cost-of-living increase, just give them a housing stipend.
Unfortunately for Moran, his proposal failed to advance Wednesday in the House Appropriations Committee, which took it up via voice vote. But apparently a few audible “ayes” did come from the Democratic side.
Members of Congress are on track to get a cost-of-living adjustment each year, but Congress can adjust the increase or block it altogether. They’ve blocked it 11 times and allowed it 13 times since 1992.
Especially in these current economic times, it’s politically tough to basically allow yourself to get a raise. Congress has now stopped a raise for fiscal 2015, for the sixth time in a row.
So Moran’s proposal would have essentially restructured that cost-of-living increase so that Congress automatically gets a housing stipend. It would equal $25 a day when Congress is in session, available to House members whose primary residence is more than 50 miles from the Capitol. That means $2,800 for 2014, according to Moran’s office.
Moran’s argument also centers on the idea that Congress is a place that will attract average people, who are not independently wealthy.
“The House is supposed to reflect the people of this country. Don’t we want it to make financial sense for a 30-something physician, district attorney, city council member, or small-business owner, who maybe has a new home mortgage, young children, or unpaid student loan debt, to serve in Congress?” Moran said in a statement. “Federal elected office shouldn’t be limited just to those who are financially independent and do not have to give thought to paying out-of-pocket for living expenses while in D.C.”
Moran told Roll Call earlier this month that members of Congress are underpaid. “A lot of members can’t even afford to live decently in Washington,” he said then.
Moran is retiring at the end of his term, so he can touch such a politically thorny issue like this as few others can. Plus, he lives close to D.C. anyway, and his office says he doesn’t stand to personally benefit from his pitch. But members of Congress are truly like the rest of us! Even they are worried about getting priced out of a rapidly gentrifying and pricey Washington, D.C.
What We're Following See More »
In town to receive the Mark Twain Prize for American Humor at the Kennedy Center, Bill Murray casually strolled into the White House Briefing Room this afternoon. A spokesman said he was at the executive mansion for a chat with President Obama, his fellow Chicagoan.
"A federal appeals court's decision that declared the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau an arm of the White House relies on a novel interpretation of the constitution's separation of powers clause that could have broader effects on how other regulators" like the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Housing Finance Agency.
"According to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll, the first national post-debate survey, 43 percent of registered voters said the Democratic candidate won, compared with 26 percent who opted for the Republican Party’s standard bearer. Her 6-point lead over Trump among likely voters is unchanged from our previous survey: Clinton still leads Trump 42 percent to 36 percent in the race for the White House, with Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson taking 9 percent of the vote."
Twitter bots, "automated social media accounts that interact with other users," accounted for a large part of the online discussion during the first presidential debate. Bots made up 22 percent of conversation about Hillary Clinton on the social media platform, and a whopping one third of Twitter conversation about Donald Trump.
The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, the nonprofit that published the Panama Papers earlier this year, is being spun off from its parent organization, the Center for Public Integrity. According to a statement, "CPI’s Board of Directors has decided that enabling the ICIJ to chart its own course will help both journalistic teams build on the massive impact they have had as one organization."