Saudi Arabia’s top diplomat accused the Syrian regime of conducting new chemical strikes that he called a test of “international will,” Reuters reports.
“These continuous violations by the Damascus regime require the international community to take firm action against the continuous defiance of international, Arab and Islamic will,” Saudi Foreign Minister Saud al-Faisal told journalists in Riyadh on Tuesday.
His statement came in reaction to reports of several chemical strikes conducted on Friday and Saturday in Syria’s three-year-old civil war. Syrian President Bashar Assad’s government and its opposition have blamed one another for the attacks, which allegedly involved releases of chlorine gas in the rebel-held town of Kfar Zeita.
The Saudi foreign minister said the new allegations constitute an affront to the U.N. Security Council’s 2013 call for Assad’s regime to eliminate its chemical arms. The government joined an international chemical-arms ban and agreed to eliminate its stockpiled warfare substances after a sarin gas assault in August prompted threats of international military intervention in the conflict.
The regime’s disarmament pledge does not extend to chlorine, which has peaceful applications. Still, the Chemical Weapons Convention prohibits use of the substance in combat, according to former British military officer Hamish de Bretton-Gordon.
The issue expert said chlorine is easy to obtain in Syria, but added that the material reportedly fell from aircraft in the recent alleged attacks.
“As far as I am aware, the opposition does not have helicopters,” de Bretton-Gordon said.
What We're Following See More »
"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”
The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.
President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."
Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.