Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito is no longer recusing himself from an important case reviewing the right to stream television programs online, the Court announced Monday.
The decision came without explanation. Alito has historically recused himself from preliminary orders the Court has issued concerning the case, ABC v. Aereo, presumably because he held stock in Walt Disney Co. The move may signal that Alito has eliminated any financial conflicts of interest he previously possessed.
This is not the first time financial holdings have been an issue for Alito. The conservative justice issued a rare apology in 2011 for presiding over a case reviewing expletives on television that involved ABC, which is owned by Disney. At the time Alito called the decision to hear that case “a mistake,” though he ultimately voted with the majority against ABC and other networks.
Aereo uses clusters of tiny antennas to allow customers to watch and record broadcast TV on their computers, mobile devices, and Internet-powered TVs for a monthly fee. Television broadcasters say Aereo is stealing their content, but the video site claims it’s just making it easier to access over-the-air television.
The Supreme Court will hear arguments next Tuesday. By rejoining the case, Alito has eliminated the possibility of a 4-4 tie, which would have allowed a lower court decision siding with Aereo to stand.
The Court also announced Monday that Alito was no longer recused from POM Wonderful v. Cola-Cola, a case also being heard next week examining truthful labeling requirements of fruit juices.
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."