Alito No Longer Recused From Aereo Case

The conservative Supreme Court justice will join the rest of the bench next week in reviewing the right to stream broadcast TV online.

National Journal
Dustin Volz
Add to Briefcase
Dustin Volz
April 16, 2014, 2:05 p.m.

Su­preme Court Justice Samuel Alito is no longer re­cus­ing him­self from an im­port­ant case re­view­ing the right to stream tele­vi­sion pro­grams on­line, the Court an­nounced Monday.

The de­cision came without ex­plan­a­tion. Alito has his­tor­ic­ally re­cused him­self from pre­lim­in­ary or­ders the Court has is­sued con­cern­ing the case, ABC v. Aereo, pre­sum­ably be­cause he held stock in Walt Dis­ney Co. The move may sig­nal that Alito has elim­in­ated any fin­an­cial con­flicts of in­terest he pre­vi­ously pos­sessed.

This is not the first time fin­an­cial hold­ings have been an is­sue for Alito. The con­ser­vat­ive justice is­sued a rare apo­logy in 2011 for presid­ing over a case re­view­ing ex­plet­ives on tele­vi­sion that in­volved ABC, which is owned by Dis­ney. At the time Alito called the de­cision to hear that case “a mis­take,” though he ul­ti­mately voted with the ma­jor­ity against ABC and oth­er net­works.

Aereo uses clusters of tiny an­ten­nas to al­low cus­tom­ers to watch and re­cord broad­cast TV on their com­puters, mo­bile devices, and In­ter­net-powered TVs for a monthly fee. Tele­vi­sion broad­casters say Aereo is steal­ing their con­tent, but the video site claims it’s just mak­ing it easi­er to ac­cess over-the-air tele­vi­sion. 

The Su­preme Court will hear ar­gu­ments next Tues­day. By re­join­ing the case, Alito has elim­in­ated the pos­sib­il­ity of a 4-4 tie, which would have al­lowed a lower court de­cision sid­ing with Aereo to stand. 

The Court also an­nounced Monday that Alito was no longer re­cused from POM Won­der­ful v. Cola-Cola, a case also be­ing heard next week ex­amin­ing truth­ful la­beling re­quire­ments of fruit juices.

What We're Following See More »
WITH LIVE BLOGGING
Trump Deposition Video Is Online
1 days ago
STAFF PICKS

The video of Donald Trump's deposition in his case against restaurateur Jeffrey Zakarian is now live. Slate's Jim Newell and Josh Voorhees are live-blogging it while they watch.

Source:
SOUND LEVEL AFFECTED
Debate Commission Admits Issues with Trump’s Mic
1 days ago
THE LATEST

The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.

Source:
TRUMP VS. CHEFS
Trump Deposition Video to Be Released
1 days ago
THE LATEST

"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."

Source:
A CANDIDATE TO BE ‘PROUD’ OF
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
1 days ago
THE LATEST

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
×