Can Facebook Help You Find Your Friends Without Being Creepy?

The social network entered the discovery-app world Thursday with its new Nearby Friends feature — but can it quell privacy concerns?

National Journal
Dustin Volz
Add to Briefcase
Dustin Volz
April 17, 2014, 9 a.m.

Face­book is ready to help you find your friends — and only your friends — in the real world.

The so­cial-me­dia jug­ger­naut launched a new geo­loca­tion fea­ture Thursday that uses your phone’s GPS to dis­cov­er when your Face­book friends are close by and sends you a no­ti­fic­a­tion if they are in­ter­ested in meet­ing up.

The op­tion­al ser­vice, simply named Nearby Friends, is meant to bol­ster the sort of ac­ci­dent­al en­coun­ters between two friends who might oth­er­wise not know they’re at the same con­cert, movie premiere, or art mu­seum.

It is def­in­itely, em­phat­ic­ally not a way to find new people or dat­ing pro­spects, prom­ises the product’s lead en­gin­eer, An­drea Vac­cari.

“Look­ing at the data showed us that, while, yeah, it’s cool to meet new people “¦ when there is that serendip­it­ous meet­ing with a friend nearby, that is so much more power­ful,” Vac­cari told Na­tion­al Journ­al dur­ing a private demo at the com­pany’s Wash­ing­ton of­fice. “That really makes everything else sort of sec­ond­ary.”

The idea is simple enough: The next time you go to a big con­cert or a base­ball game or shop down­town, Face­book will no­ti­fy you of friends in the gen­er­al area and ap­prox­im­ately how far they are from you (e.g., one mile, one-half mile, etc.). If you want to meet one of them, you can ping them to share your “pre­cise loc­a­tion” on a map for a chosen dur­a­tion of time. The friend can agree to share her pre­cise co­ordin­ates as well. Nav­ig­ate ac­cord­ingly un­til ren­dez­vous is com­plete.

Like many of Face­book’s new toys, Nearby Friends will have a lim­ited, staggered rol­lout. Some U.S. users will start to see the ser­vice pop up Thursday when they log on via a mo­bile device, though it is cur­rently avail­able only on iPhone and An­droid. Though CEO Mark Zuck­er­berg has ar­tic­u­lated a de­sire to “un­bundle” its ser­vices in­to sep­ar­ate phone apps, Nearby Friends is built in­to the main Face­book app and a bit bur­ied un­der­neath the “more” menu. It will also ap­pear sporad­ic­ally in news feeds.

Buck­ing Face­book’s some­what spotty re­cord of “use data, ask per­mis­sion later,” Nearby Friends is an en­tirely opt-in product — for now, at least — that is rooted in a prin­ciple of re­cipro­city. Only users who turn on Nearby Friends can see friends who are also us­ing the fea­ture.

“We spent a long time think­ing about the right com­bin­a­tion of value and con­trols,” Vac­cari said. “Loc­a­tion is a power­ful so­cial sig­nal, but we have chosen to make this ex­per­i­ence self-con­tained so people can learn how it works and get com­fort­able with it.”

Des­pite such over­tures, Face­book has drawn ire for years from those who be­lieve the com­pany is too cava­lier with how it shares user data, par­tic­u­larly with ad­vert­isers. Its re­cent $19 bil­lion ac­quis­i­tion of What­s­App has earned scru­tiny from the Elec­tron­ic Pri­vacy In­form­a­tion Cen­ter, as well as a stern warn­ing from the Fed­er­al Trade Com­mis­sion to hon­or the mo­bile-mes­saging plat­form’s com­mit­ments to user pri­vacy.

Giv­en its track re­cord, Nearby Friends is sure to be seen as creepy by some no mat­ter what. And no one knows that bet­ter than Face­book.

The com­pany tried to launch a sim­il­ar product two years ago, then dubbed “Find Friends Nearby” (after a fleet­ing monik­er of “Friend­shake“), but the quiet pro­ject was un­ce­re­mo­ni­ously killed just days after it hit the mar­ket. That it­er­a­tion’s rais­on d’être was fun­da­ment­ally dif­fer­ent than the cur­rent product. In­stead of help­ing you find where your preex­ist­ing friends are, the old product wanted to make it easy to hop on Face­book and find the pro­files of people nearby who were not already your friend, to make it easy to con­nect long-term with the wo­man you bumped in­to at the lib­rary or the nicely dressed guy at a con­fer­ence.

The lead en­gin­eer for that pro­ject, Ry­an Pat­ter­son, wrote at the time that “the ideal-use case for this product is the one where when you’re out with a group of people whom you’ve re­cently met and want to stay in con­tact with.”

Vac­cari once agreed. He in­ven­ted a sim­il­ar loc­a­tion app, Glancee, be­fore be­ing bought out by Face­book two months be­fore it tried to launch Find Friends Nearby.

But Vac­cari’s new product drops the concept that we need to “find” any­one new. In­stead, Nearby Friends is only for your friend groups, and, like most of the com­pany’s fea­tures, it can be lim­ited to a se­lect list of spe­cial friends. So if you want your sig­ni­fic­ant oth­er to know where you are but not your grandma, you’re covered.

Sev­er­al loc­a­tion-based dis­cov­ery apps are already on the mar­ket, and some even cul­tiv­ate user data from Face­book to help “match” people with oth­ers close by who may share com­mon in­terests. Ser­vices like Tinder and Grindr are com­monly used for dat­ing.

But Vac­cari and Face­book be­lieve the de­sire of “find­ing” someone is guided by two prin­ciples: want­ing to spend more time with friends and pro­tect­ing pri­vacy and data.

“There were a lot of products out there that took the first idea in­to ac­count, but not the second one,” Vac­cari said. “For the first value prop, to meet your friends, to hap­pen, every­one has to feel com­fort­able.”

What We're Following See More »
STAKES ARE HIGH
Debate Could Sway One-Third of Voters
7 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll found that 34% of registered voters think the three presidential debates would be extremely or quite important in helping them decide whom to support for president. About 11% of voters are considered 'debate persuadables'—that is, they think the debates are important and are either third-party voters or only loosely committed to either major-party candidate."

Source:
YOU DON’T BRING ME FLOWERS ANYMORE
Gennifer Flowers May Not Appear After All
7 hours ago
THE LATEST

Will he or won't he? That's the question surrounding Donald Trump and his on-again, off-again threats to bring onetime Bill Clinton paramour Gennifer Flowers to the debate as his guest. An assistant to flowers initially said she'd be there, but Trump campaign chief Kellyanne Conway "said on ABC’s 'This Week' that the Trump campaign had not invited Flowers to the debate, but she didn’t rule out the possibility of Flowers being in the audience."

Source:
HAS BEEN OFF OF NEWSCASTS FOR A WEEK
For First Debate, Holt Called on NBC Experts for Prep
7 hours ago
THE DETAILS

NBC's Lester Holt hasn't hosted the "Nightly News" since Tuesday, as he's prepped for moderating the first presidential debate tonight—and the first of his career. He's called on a host of NBC talent to help him, namely NBC News and MSNBC chairman Andy Lack; NBC News president Deborah Turness; the news division's senior vice president of editorial, Janelle Rodriguez; "Nightly News" producer Sam Singal, "Meet the Press" host Chuck Todd, senior political editor Mark Murray and political editor Carrie Dann. But during the debate itself, the only person in Holt's earpiece will be longtime debate producer Marty Slutsky.

Source:
WHITE HOUSE PROMISES VETO
House Votes to Bar Cash Payments to Iran
7 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The House passed legislation late Thursday that would prohibit the federal government from making any cash payments to Iran, in protest of President Obama's recently discovered decision to pay Iran $1.7 billion in cash in January. And while the White House has said Obama would veto the bill, 16 Democrats joined with Republicans to pass the measure, 254-163."

Source:
NO SURPRISE
Trump Eschewing Briefing Materials in Debate Prep
7 hours ago
THE DETAILS

In contrast to Hillary Clinton's meticulous debate practice sessions, Donald Trump "is largely shun­ning tra­di­tion­al de­bate pre­par­a­tions, but has been watch­ing video of…Clin­ton’s best and worst de­bate mo­ments, look­ing for her vul­ner­ab­il­it­ies.” Trump “has paid only curs­ory at­ten­tion to brief­ing ma­ter­i­als. He has re­fused to use lecterns in mock de­bate ses­sions des­pite the ur­ging of his ad­visers. He prefers spit­balling ideas with his team rather than hon­ing them in­to crisp, two-minute an­swers.”

Source:
×