College Board/National Journal Poll

Few Americans Worry That Pre-K Takes Children Out of the Home Too Soon

Older Americans are most likely to fear that programs separate kids from their families.

A child's successful education starts in preschool -- or even before. 
National Journal
Ronald Brownstein
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Ronald Brownstein
April 21, 2014, 7:58 a.m.

Would uni­ver­sal pre-K un­der­mine the fam­ily and move chil­dren too quickly out of the house in­to an or­gan­ized learn­ing en­vir­on­ment? A pre­pon­der­ant ma­jor­ity of Amer­ic­ans say no, ac­cord­ing to the latest Col­lege Board/Na­tion­al Journ­al Next Amer­ica Poll.

Asked about the im­pact of gov­ern­ment policies to en­sure that all 4-year-olds could at­tend pre­kinder­garten classes, just 21 per­cent said they wor­ried that such an ini­ti­at­ive would “move chil­dren out of the house and away from their fam­ily at too young an age.” By con­trast, a 70 per­cent ma­jor­ity said such policies would “provide more chil­dren a bet­ter chance to suc­ceed.”

Faith that ex­pan­ded preschool would im­prove the odds for more chil­dren was es­pe­cially pro­nounced among Afric­an-Amer­ic­ans (82 per­cent), Asi­an-Amer­ic­ans (80 per­cent), and His­pan­ics (78 per­cent). But 66 per­cent of whites also agreed; just 25 per­cent of whites said they be­lieved that ex­pan­ded preschool would sep­ar­ate chil­dren from their fam­il­ies at too young an age.

Some party dif­fer­ences en­dured. Among self-iden­ti­fied Demo­crats, sup­port for preschool was near-uni­ver­sal: 87 per­cent said it would in­crease op­por­tun­ity, while only 9 per­cent wor­ried it would sep­ar­ate kids too quickly. In­de­pend­ents also bent to­ward op­por­tun­ity by a sub­stan­tial 64 per­cent to 25 per­cent mar­gin. Re­pub­lic­ans were slightly more equi­voc­al, but not much: 60 per­cent of them thought uni­ver­sal preschool would in­crease op­por­tun­ity, ex­actly double the share that wor­ried about mov­ing young chil­dren from the home.

Fear of loosen­ing fam­ily bonds was muted even among the GOP-lean­ing con­stitu­en­cies usu­ally most re­cept­ive to so­cially con­ser­vat­ive ar­gu­ments. Just 21 per­cent of rur­al adults wor­ried about sep­ar­at­ing kids too fast; 71 per­cent thought ex­pan­ded preschool was more likely to ex­pand op­por­tun­ity. Like­wise just 26 per­cent of whites without a col­lege edu­ca­tion saw a threat to fam­ily, while 64 per­cent saw more op­por­tun­ity; that wasn’t much dif­fer­ent than the 22 per­cent to 69 per­cent split among col­lege-edu­cated whites, who usu­ally take much more so­cially lib­er­al stands.

The most hes­it­a­tion was evid­ent among whites over 65: Fully 36 per­cent of this group wor­ried about sep­ar­a­tion, com­pared with 47 per­cent who saw more op­por­tun­ity. That con­trasts sharply with whites un­der 35 — who were over four times as likely to view ex­pan­ded preschool as an op­por­tun­ity than a threat — as well as with older minor­it­ies. Minor­it­ies over 50 were ex­actly as likely as young­er minor­it­ies to see mostly be­ne­fits in ex­pan­ded preschool; in each case, just 16 per­cent of those sur­veyed wor­ried about mov­ing kids away from their homes too fast, while 80 per­cent thought it would pro­duce ex­pan­ded op­por­tun­ity. (Un­der­scor­ing the depth of the con­sensus, those num­bers were vir­tu­ally identic­al among both male and fe­male minor­it­ies and those with and without four-year col­lege de­grees.)

A sep­ar­ate Next Amer­ica Poll ques­tion fo­cus­ing on the ef­fect­ive­ness, rather than the fam­ily im­pact, of early-child­hood in­ter­ven­tion re­vealed some­what more vari­ation. On that ques­tion, Re­pub­lic­ans were less likely than Demo­crats, and whites and Asi­ans less likely than Afric­an-Amer­ic­ans and His­pan­ics, to agree that ex­pand­ing ac­cess to pre-K would sig­ni­fic­antly boost the pro­spects for chil­dren. Still, even on that ques­tion, a ma­jor­ity of whites and Re­pub­lic­ans said they be­lieved ex­pan­ded pre-K would ex­ert a “ma­jor im­pact” in help­ing more chil­dren suc­ceed.

The Col­lege Board/Na­tion­al Journ­al Next Amer­ica Poll, con­duc­ted by Prin­ceton Sur­vey Re­search As­so­ci­ates In­ter­na­tion­al, sur­veyed 1,271 adults, in­clud­ing over­samples of Afric­an-Amer­ic­ans, His­pan­ics, and Asi­an-Amer­ic­ans, March 18-26. The in­ter­views were con­duc­ted by land­line and cell phone in Eng­lish and Span­ish. The poll has a mar­gin of er­ror of plus or minus 3.9 per­cent­age points for the en­tire sample, and lar­ger mar­gins for ra­cial sub­groups.

What We're Following See More »
CITES CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Lieberman Withdraws from Consideration for FBI Job
2 days ago
THE LATEST
MINIMUM 2 PERCENT GDP
Trump Tells NATO Countries To Pay Up
2 days ago
BREAKING
MANAFORT AND FLYNN
Russians Discussed Influencing Trump Through Aides
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Source:
BUT WHITE HOUSE MAY USE AGAINST HIM ANYWAY
Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Source:
BUSINESSES CAN’T PLEAD FIFTH
Senate Intel to Subpoena Two of Flynn’s Businesses
4 days ago
THE LATEST

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login