College Board/National Journal Poll

Few Americans Worry That Pre-K Takes Children Out of the Home Too Soon

Older Americans are most likely to fear that programs separate kids from their families.

A child's successful education starts in preschool -- or even before. 
National Journal
Ronald Brownstein
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Ronald Brownstein
April 21, 2014, 7:58 a.m.

Would uni­ver­sal pre-K un­der­mine the fam­ily and move chil­dren too quickly out of the house in­to an or­gan­ized learn­ing en­vir­on­ment? A pre­pon­der­ant ma­jor­ity of Amer­ic­ans say no, ac­cord­ing to the latest Col­lege Board/Na­tion­al Journ­al Next Amer­ica Poll.

Asked about the im­pact of gov­ern­ment policies to en­sure that all 4-year-olds could at­tend pre­kinder­garten classes, just 21 per­cent said they wor­ried that such an ini­ti­at­ive would “move chil­dren out of the house and away from their fam­ily at too young an age.” By con­trast, a 70 per­cent ma­jor­ity said such policies would “provide more chil­dren a bet­ter chance to suc­ceed.”

Faith that ex­pan­ded preschool would im­prove the odds for more chil­dren was es­pe­cially pro­nounced among Afric­an-Amer­ic­ans (82 per­cent), Asi­an-Amer­ic­ans (80 per­cent), and His­pan­ics (78 per­cent). But 66 per­cent of whites also agreed; just 25 per­cent of whites said they be­lieved that ex­pan­ded preschool would sep­ar­ate chil­dren from their fam­il­ies at too young an age.

Some party dif­fer­ences en­dured. Among self-iden­ti­fied Demo­crats, sup­port for preschool was near-uni­ver­sal: 87 per­cent said it would in­crease op­por­tun­ity, while only 9 per­cent wor­ried it would sep­ar­ate kids too quickly. In­de­pend­ents also bent to­ward op­por­tun­ity by a sub­stan­tial 64 per­cent to 25 per­cent mar­gin. Re­pub­lic­ans were slightly more equi­voc­al, but not much: 60 per­cent of them thought uni­ver­sal preschool would in­crease op­por­tun­ity, ex­actly double the share that wor­ried about mov­ing young chil­dren from the home.

Fear of loosen­ing fam­ily bonds was muted even among the GOP-lean­ing con­stitu­en­cies usu­ally most re­cept­ive to so­cially con­ser­vat­ive ar­gu­ments. Just 21 per­cent of rur­al adults wor­ried about sep­ar­at­ing kids too fast; 71 per­cent thought ex­pan­ded preschool was more likely to ex­pand op­por­tun­ity. Like­wise just 26 per­cent of whites without a col­lege edu­ca­tion saw a threat to fam­ily, while 64 per­cent saw more op­por­tun­ity; that wasn’t much dif­fer­ent than the 22 per­cent to 69 per­cent split among col­lege-edu­cated whites, who usu­ally take much more so­cially lib­er­al stands.

The most hes­it­a­tion was evid­ent among whites over 65: Fully 36 per­cent of this group wor­ried about sep­ar­a­tion, com­pared with 47 per­cent who saw more op­por­tun­ity. That con­trasts sharply with whites un­der 35 — who were over four times as likely to view ex­pan­ded preschool as an op­por­tun­ity than a threat — as well as with older minor­it­ies. Minor­it­ies over 50 were ex­actly as likely as young­er minor­it­ies to see mostly be­ne­fits in ex­pan­ded preschool; in each case, just 16 per­cent of those sur­veyed wor­ried about mov­ing kids away from their homes too fast, while 80 per­cent thought it would pro­duce ex­pan­ded op­por­tun­ity. (Un­der­scor­ing the depth of the con­sensus, those num­bers were vir­tu­ally identic­al among both male and fe­male minor­it­ies and those with and without four-year col­lege de­grees.)

A sep­ar­ate Next Amer­ica Poll ques­tion fo­cus­ing on the ef­fect­ive­ness, rather than the fam­ily im­pact, of early-child­hood in­ter­ven­tion re­vealed some­what more vari­ation. On that ques­tion, Re­pub­lic­ans were less likely than Demo­crats, and whites and Asi­ans less likely than Afric­an-Amer­ic­ans and His­pan­ics, to agree that ex­pand­ing ac­cess to pre-K would sig­ni­fic­antly boost the pro­spects for chil­dren. Still, even on that ques­tion, a ma­jor­ity of whites and Re­pub­lic­ans said they be­lieved ex­pan­ded pre-K would ex­ert a “ma­jor im­pact” in help­ing more chil­dren suc­ceed.

The Col­lege Board/Na­tion­al Journ­al Next Amer­ica Poll, con­duc­ted by Prin­ceton Sur­vey Re­search As­so­ci­ates In­ter­na­tion­al, sur­veyed 1,271 adults, in­clud­ing over­samples of Afric­an-Amer­ic­ans, His­pan­ics, and Asi­an-Amer­ic­ans, March 18-26. The in­ter­views were con­duc­ted by land­line and cell phone in Eng­lish and Span­ish. The poll has a mar­gin of er­ror of plus or minus 3.9 per­cent­age points for the en­tire sample, and lar­ger mar­gins for ra­cial sub­groups.

What We're Following See More »
AT ISSUE: COMEY FIRING, SESSIONS’S RECUSAL
Mueller Seeks Documents from DOJ
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

Special counsel Robert Mueller "is now demanding documents from the department overseeing his investigation." A source tells ABC News that "Mueller's investigators are keen to obtain emails related to the firing of FBI Director James Comey and the earlier decision of Attorney General Jeff Sessions to recuse himself from the entire matter."

Source:
MULVANEY SAYS PROVISION ISN’T A DEALBREAKER
Trump May Be OK with Dropping Mandate Repeal
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

"President Donald Trump would not insist on including repeal of an Obama-era health insurance mandate in a bill intended to enact the biggest overhaul of the tax code since the 1980s, a senior White House aide said on Sunday. The version of tax legislation put forward by Senate Republican leaders would remove a requirement in former President Barack Obama’s signature healthcare law that taxes Americans who decline to buy health insurance."

Source:
FRANKEN JUST THE BEGINNING?
Media Devoting More Resources to Lawmakers’ Sexual Misconduct
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Members of Congress with histories of mistreating women should be extremely nervous. Major outlets, including CNN, are dedicating substantial newsroom resources to investigating sexual harassment allegations against numerous lawmakers. A Republican source told me he's gotten calls from well-known D.C. reporters who are gathering stories about sleazy members."

Source:
STARTS LEGAL FUND FOR WH STAFF
Trump to Begin Covering His Own Legal Bills
2 days ago
THE DETAILS
DISCUSSED THE MATTER FOR A NEW BOOK
Steele Says Follow the Money
2 days ago
STAFF PICKS

"Christopher Steele, the former British intelligence officer who wrote the explosive dossier alleging ties between Donald Trump and Russia," says in a new book by The Guardian's Luke Harding that "Trump's land and hotel deals with Russians needed to be examined. ... Steele did not go into further detail, Harding said, but seemed to be referring to a 2008 home sale to the Russian oligarch Dmitry Rybolovlev. Richard Dearlove, who headed the UK foreign-intelligence unit MI6 between 1999 and 2004, said in April that Trump borrowed money from Russia for his business during the 2008 financial crisis."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login