College Board/National Journal Poll

Few Americans Worry That Pre-K Takes Children Out of the Home Too Soon

Older Americans are most likely to fear that programs separate kids from their families.

A child's successful education starts in preschool -- or even before. 
National Journal
Ronald Brownstein
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Ronald Brownstein
April 21, 2014, 7:58 a.m.

Would uni­ver­sal pre-K un­der­mine the fam­ily and move chil­dren too quickly out of the house in­to an or­gan­ized learn­ing en­vir­on­ment? A pre­pon­der­ant ma­jor­ity of Amer­ic­ans say no, ac­cord­ing to the latest Col­lege Board/Na­tion­al Journ­al Next Amer­ica Poll.

Asked about the im­pact of gov­ern­ment policies to en­sure that all 4-year-olds could at­tend pre­kinder­garten classes, just 21 per­cent said they wor­ried that such an ini­ti­at­ive would “move chil­dren out of the house and away from their fam­ily at too young an age.” By con­trast, a 70 per­cent ma­jor­ity said such policies would “provide more chil­dren a bet­ter chance to suc­ceed.”

Faith that ex­pan­ded preschool would im­prove the odds for more chil­dren was es­pe­cially pro­nounced among Afric­an-Amer­ic­ans (82 per­cent), Asi­an-Amer­ic­ans (80 per­cent), and His­pan­ics (78 per­cent). But 66 per­cent of whites also agreed; just 25 per­cent of whites said they be­lieved that ex­pan­ded preschool would sep­ar­ate chil­dren from their fam­il­ies at too young an age.

Some party dif­fer­ences en­dured. Among self-iden­ti­fied Demo­crats, sup­port for preschool was near-uni­ver­sal: 87 per­cent said it would in­crease op­por­tun­ity, while only 9 per­cent wor­ried it would sep­ar­ate kids too quickly. In­de­pend­ents also bent to­ward op­por­tun­ity by a sub­stan­tial 64 per­cent to 25 per­cent mar­gin. Re­pub­lic­ans were slightly more equi­voc­al, but not much: 60 per­cent of them thought uni­ver­sal preschool would in­crease op­por­tun­ity, ex­actly double the share that wor­ried about mov­ing young chil­dren from the home.

Fear of loosen­ing fam­ily bonds was muted even among the GOP-lean­ing con­stitu­en­cies usu­ally most re­cept­ive to so­cially con­ser­vat­ive ar­gu­ments. Just 21 per­cent of rur­al adults wor­ried about sep­ar­at­ing kids too fast; 71 per­cent thought ex­pan­ded preschool was more likely to ex­pand op­por­tun­ity. Like­wise just 26 per­cent of whites without a col­lege edu­ca­tion saw a threat to fam­ily, while 64 per­cent saw more op­por­tun­ity; that wasn’t much dif­fer­ent than the 22 per­cent to 69 per­cent split among col­lege-edu­cated whites, who usu­ally take much more so­cially lib­er­al stands.

The most hes­it­a­tion was evid­ent among whites over 65: Fully 36 per­cent of this group wor­ried about sep­ar­a­tion, com­pared with 47 per­cent who saw more op­por­tun­ity. That con­trasts sharply with whites un­der 35 — who were over four times as likely to view ex­pan­ded preschool as an op­por­tun­ity than a threat — as well as with older minor­it­ies. Minor­it­ies over 50 were ex­actly as likely as young­er minor­it­ies to see mostly be­ne­fits in ex­pan­ded preschool; in each case, just 16 per­cent of those sur­veyed wor­ried about mov­ing kids away from their homes too fast, while 80 per­cent thought it would pro­duce ex­pan­ded op­por­tun­ity. (Un­der­scor­ing the depth of the con­sensus, those num­bers were vir­tu­ally identic­al among both male and fe­male minor­it­ies and those with and without four-year col­lege de­grees.)

A sep­ar­ate Next Amer­ica Poll ques­tion fo­cus­ing on the ef­fect­ive­ness, rather than the fam­ily im­pact, of early-child­hood in­ter­ven­tion re­vealed some­what more vari­ation. On that ques­tion, Re­pub­lic­ans were less likely than Demo­crats, and whites and Asi­ans less likely than Afric­an-Amer­ic­ans and His­pan­ics, to agree that ex­pand­ing ac­cess to pre-K would sig­ni­fic­antly boost the pro­spects for chil­dren. Still, even on that ques­tion, a ma­jor­ity of whites and Re­pub­lic­ans said they be­lieved ex­pan­ded pre-K would ex­ert a “ma­jor im­pact” in help­ing more chil­dren suc­ceed.

The Col­lege Board/Na­tion­al Journ­al Next Amer­ica Poll, con­duc­ted by Prin­ceton Sur­vey Re­search As­so­ci­ates In­ter­na­tion­al, sur­veyed 1,271 adults, in­clud­ing over­samples of Afric­an-Amer­ic­ans, His­pan­ics, and Asi­an-Amer­ic­ans, March 18-26. The in­ter­views were con­duc­ted by land­line and cell phone in Eng­lish and Span­ish. The poll has a mar­gin of er­ror of plus or minus 3.9 per­cent­age points for the en­tire sample, and lar­ger mar­gins for ra­cial sub­groups.

What We're Following See More »
FCC Tightens Internet Privacy Standards
3 hours ago

Along party lines, the Federal Communications Commission on Thursday voted to tighten privacy standards for Internet service providers. "The regulations will require providers to receive explicit customer consent before using an individual’s web browsing or app usage history for marketing purposes. The broadband industry fought to keep that obligation out of the rules."

Obama Commutes Another 98 Sentences
4 hours ago

President Obama commuted the sentences of another 98 drug offenders on Thursday. Most of the convicts were charged with conspiracy to distribute drugs or possession with intent to distribute. Many of the sentences were commuted to expire next year, but some will run longer. Others are required to enroll in residential drug treatment as a condition of their release.

DOJ Busts More Than 50 for Call Center Scam
4 hours ago

The Department of Justice announced today it's charged "61 individuals and entities for their alleged involvement in a transnational criminal organization that has victimized tens of thousands of persons in the United States through fraudulent schemes that have resulted in hundreds of millions of dollars in losses. In connection with the scheme, 20 individuals were arrested today in the United States and 32 individuals and five call centers in India were charged for their alleged involvement. An additional U.S.-based defendant is currently in the custody of immigration authorities."

Johnson on Ballot Everywhere, Followed by Stein, McMullin
6 hours ago
Is McMullin Building the GOP in Exile?
8 hours ago

Evan McMullin, the independent conservative candidate who may win his home state of Utah, is quietly planning to turn his candidacy into a broader movement for principled conservatism. He tells BuzzFeed he's "skeptical" that the Republican party can reform itself "within a generation" and that the party's internal "disease" can't be cured via "the existing infrastructure.” The ex-CIA employee and Capitol Hill staffer says, “I have seen and worked with a lot of very courageous people in my time [but] I have seen a remarkable display of cowardice over the last couple of months in our leaders.” McMullin's team has assembled organizations in the 11 states where he's on the ballot, and adviser Rick Wilson says "there’s actually a very vibrant market for our message in the urban northeast and in parts of the south."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.