The Air Force will move away from implicitly requiring perfect test scores from its nuclear missile-launch officers, the Wyoming Tribune Eagle reports.
The service formally requires a score of 90 percent for its missileers to pass routine tests for certification to serve in underground launch-control centers for the U.S. arsenal of 450 Minuteman 3 intercontinental ballistic missiles. However, there has often been a tacit understanding in the service’s nuclear-missile branch that officers had to score 100 percent on the tests or risk seeing their career prospects diminished.
Air Force leaders have blamed that so-called “culture of perfection” for motivating dozens of young launch-control officers to cheat on the exams — or look the other way when their colleagues cheated. An official investigation into test-taking misconduct at Malmstrom Air Force Base, Mont., resulted in the service last month firing a number of mid-level officers at the base for failing to sufficiently supervise the officers beneath them.
The commander of the 20th Air Force, which oversees all Minuteman 3 missiles, told the Tribune Eagle that he is working to shift how “perfect” is construed. Still, he said the public should continue to expect that nuclear missiles will be handled without error.
“You don’t have to be perfect in testing, and you don’t have to be perfect in training,” Maj. Gen. Jack Weinstein said. “But you do have to be perfect when you are doing the mission.”
The two-star general said 350 recommendations on how to improve the ICBM mission have been received as part of an expansive study that surveyed Air Force nuclear-missile officers and work crews. Weinstein said he and other service brass accept nearly all of the recommendations.
The test-cheating revelations “may be a tough pill to swallow, but I really believe that with everything that has happened, good is going to come out of this and make us stronger,” he said.
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."