The Accountability Revolution Comes to Head Start

Since 2011, more than 350 Head Start providers have had to compete for federal grant money. That’s a huge change.

Education Secretary Arne Duncan and former HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius read the Dr. Seuss book 'Green Eggs and Ham' to students enrolled in a Head Start program at Rolling Terrace Elementary School March 1, 2013 in Takoma Park, Maryland.
National Journal
Sophie Quinton
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Sophie Quinton
April 23, 2014, 6:13 a.m.

BAL­TIMORE — St. Jerome’s Head Start, a plain build­ing in a gentri­fy­ing Bal­timore neigh­bor­hood, looks as sol­id and un­chan­ging as a block of con­crete. It’s an un­likely set­ting for a big shift in how early-child­hood edu­ca­tion is provided. But here and across the city, Head Start teach­ers are grap­pling with new rules for edu­cat­ing chil­dren. Staffers are un­der pres­sure to make sure pro­gram fin­ances are air­tight. And cen­ters are wait­ing to hear the fi­nal de­tails of a plan to change the way early-child­hood ser­vices are de­livered city­wide.

Head Start, the fed­er­ally fun­ded preschool pro­gram for low-in­come chil­dren, has ex­per­i­enced more change in the past three years than in the pre­vi­ous 40. After years of de­bate about the pro­gram’s qual­ity and value, there’s an ac­count­ab­il­ity re­volu­tion com­ing to preschool.

Op­er­at­ing un­der au­thor­ity from a 2007 law signed by George W. Bush, the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion has star­ted re­quir­ing Head Start pro­viders that per­form poorly on fed­er­al audits to com­pete against oth­er loc­al pro­viders — and win — to keep their grants for the next five years. If all goes ac­cord­ing to plan, by the end of 2014 the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment will have re­viewed every Head Start pro­gram un­der new per­form­ance cri­ter­ia. So far, more than 350 of some 1,700 Head Start grant re­cip­i­ents have been forced to com­pete for their fund­ing, and many more will be re­quired to do so in the years ahead.

For Head Start pro­grams that have faced barely any re­quire­ments to demon­strate their ef­fect­ive­ness, this counts as a re­volu­tion. “It has had a huge im­pact on every single pro­gram in Mary­land. They really com­pletely re­designed the way pro­grams have to look at the way they are op­er­at­ing,” says Linda Zang, the Mary­land State De­part­ment of Edu­ca­tion of­fi­cial in charge of col­lab­or­at­ing with Head Start. It seems like every year at least one grantee in the state has been re­quired to com­pete for fund­ing, Zang says. More im­port­ant, the threat of com­pet­i­tion is push­ing teach­ers across the state to be­come bet­ter edu­cat­ors.

Head Start has al­ways in­spired high ex­pect­a­tions. “We set out to make cer­tain that poverty’s chil­dren would not be forever­more poverty’s cap­tives,” Pres­id­ent John­son said when he an­nounced the cre­ation of the pro­gram, in 1965. John­son en­vi­sioned a net­work of neigh­bor­hood or­gan­iz­a­tions that would edu­cate young chil­dren, en­sure that chil­dren get med­ic­al care, and teach par­ents about child de­vel­op­ment.

Today, the Ad­min­is­tra­tion for Chil­dren and Fam­il­ies in the Health and Hu­man Ser­vices De­part­ment funds a sprawl­ing net­work of about 1,600 loc­al gov­ern­ments, school sys­tems, and private or­gan­iz­a­tions, many of which del­eg­ate fund­ing rather than op­er­at­ing pro­grams them­selves (St. Jerome’s is one of the city of Bal­timore’s 11 del­eg­ate or­gan­iz­a­tions). Pro­viders must abide by some 2,400 fed­er­al stand­ards that dic­tate everything from how toi­lets are cleaned to the size of fa­cil­it­ies. There’s also an ad­di­tion­al, smal­ler pro­gram called Early Head Start that serves preg­nant wo­men and tod­dlers.

Head Start served about 8 per­cent of Amer­ic­an 3-year olds and 11 per­cent of 4-year olds in 2012, ac­cord­ing to the Na­tion­al In­sti­tute for Early Edu­ca­tion Re­search at Rut­gers Uni­versity. Fam­il­ies must be liv­ing be­low the poverty line, or hov­er­ing just above it, to ap­ply for a spot in a pro­gram. Last year, 42 per­cent of all chil­dren served were white, 29 per­cent were Afric­an-Amer­ic­an, and 37 per­cent were Latino. In Bal­timore, al­most two-thirds of Head Start par­ents hold a high school dip­loma or less.

Fed­er­al law­makers in­creas­ingly want to see proof that Head Start pre­pares low-in­come chil­dren for kinder­garten. By age 5, af­flu­ent chil­dren tend to show great­er cog­nit­ive de­vel­op­ment than their low-in­come peers, mostly be­cause af­flu­ent, well-edu­cated par­ents have more con­ver­sa­tions with their ba­bies and use longer words when they do. Pres­id­ent Obama of­ten points to re­search show­ing low-in­come chil­dren re­ceive life­time be­ne­fits from at­tend­ing a high-qual­ity preschool pro­gram, in­clud­ing bet­ter aca­dem­ic per­form­ance all the way through high school.

But many Head Start and state-run pre­kinder­garten pro­grams aren’t high qual­ity. Na­tion­al stud­ies of pub­lic pre-K pro­grams have found that chil­dren spend most of their time play­ing, eat­ing, and wait­ing around, and that in­struc­tion­al qual­ity is gen­er­ally low. A fed­er­al im­pact study, re­leased in 2012, found that while Head Start chil­dren ex­per­i­ence ini­tial gains in health, lan­guage, and read­ing skills, those gains usu­ally dis­ap­pear by third grade. House Re­pub­lic­ans use that study to ar­gue that Head Start is a fail­ure and not worth the $8.6 bil­lion tax­pay­ers will spend on the pro­gram this year.

His­tor­ic­ally, Head Start grants were awar­ded con­tinu­ously, mean­ing that bar­ring a ma­jor vi­ol­a­tion of fed­er­al stand­ards, pro­viders could ex­pect to keep re­ceiv­ing money year after year. The Bush ad­min­is­tra­tion and a Demo­crat­ic-con­trolled Con­gress used the 2007 reau­thor­iz­a­tion of the Head Start Act to bring more com­pet­i­tion to the pro­gram and raise the stakes of fed­er­al mon­it­or­ing.

Even­tu­ally, the sys­tem will work like this: All Head Start grants will be five years long. Pro­viders will re­quest re­newed fund­ing at some point be­fore the fifth year of their grant. If they have met cer­tain per­form­ance cri­ter­ia while hold­ing the grant, fund­ing will be re­newed. If not, they’ll have to com­pete to main­tain their fund­ing.

It took un­til Decem­ber 2011 to fi­nal­ize the rules for this pro­cess, and the new sys­tem is still be­ing im­ple­men­ted. At least in the­ory, by the end of this year, HHS will have re­viewed data on every Head Start pro­vider and transitioned every pro­vider to a five-year grant, either through re­new­ing funds or sub­ject­ing it to com­pet­i­tion.

“Many of the grantees have been fun­ded since the ‘60s and ‘70s, and there wer­en’t a lot of op­por­tun­it­ies for new ap­proaches in­to the pro­grams,” says Roberto Rodrig­uez, Pres­id­ent Obama’s White House edu­ca­tion ad­viser. “We have said, ‘If you are a grantee that does not meas­ure up, you will face an open com­pet­i­tion.’ “

HHS has only re­leased the res­ults of the first round of com­pet­i­tion, which took place in 2012. The res­ults of the 2013 round will be an­nounced later this year, and pro­viders have already been no­ti­fied if they’ll have to com­pete in 2014. Eighty of the 125 pro­viders that com­peted in 2012 kept their grants, and the rest lost either part of all of their fund­ing to an­oth­er or­gan­iz­a­tion, ac­cord­ing to HHS.

In their as­sess­ments, Head Start pro­viders must now meet sev­en per­form­ance cri­ter­ia. Five are ad­min­is­trat­ive — things such as hav­ing the right li­cens­ing, and be­ing fin­an­cially solvent. Pro­viders must also set goals for pre­par­ing chil­dren for kinder­garten, and take steps to achieve them. The last and most im­port­ant change is a re­quire­ment that pro­grams meet min­im­um thresholds on the Classroom As­sess­ment Scor­ing Sys­tem, a privately de­veloped tool that as­sesses how teach­ers and staff in­ter­act with chil­dren.

CLASS doesn’t meas­ure learn­ing out­comes, per se, but high scores are cor­rel­ated with bet­ter learn­ing. “It’s been used in a lot of re­search and has been val­id­ated — mean­ing that those who have de­veloped this tool have found in nu­mer­ous re­search stud­ies that when teach­ers in­ter­act in these rich­er ways with chil­dren, that leads to bet­ter out­comes,” says Lisa Guern­sey, dir­ect­or of the New Amer­ica Found­a­tion’s Early Learn­ing Ini­ti­at­ive.

Mon­it­ors use the CLASS tool to rate pro­grams in three areas: emo­tion­al sup­port, classroom or­gan­iz­a­tion, and in­struc­tion­al sup­port. Teach­ers get high scores for in­struc­tion if they seize on teach­able mo­ments all day long: ask­ing chil­dren ques­tions, re­spond­ing with more than one-word an­swers, and in­tro­du­cing new vocab­u­lary words even in cas­u­al con­ver­sa­tion.

To re­ceive fund­ing re­newed without com­pet­i­tion, pro­viders must sur­pass min­im­um scores set by HHS set for all three areas. They also must avoid fall­ing in­to the bot­tom 10 per­cent of CLASS scores for Head Start pro­grams na­tion­ally. CLASS scores wer­en’t used to identi­fy low-per­form­ing pro­grams in the first round of com­pet­i­tion; in­stead, pro­viders were asked to com­pete if they had ad­min­is­trat­ive prob­lems noted dur­ing earli­er fed­er­al re­views. But in the second round, about 40 per­cent of grantees re­quired to com­pete for fund­ing had to do so at least partly be­cause of low CLASS scores, says Sara Mead of Bell­weth­er Edu­ca­tion Part­ners, a non­profit con­sultancy.

Mov­ing for­ward, ex­perts say low CLASS scores will likely be the main reas­on pro­grams are forced to com­pete for fund­ing. Of 388 Head Start pro­viders the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment as­sessed with the CLASS tool in 2012, the av­er­age in­struc­tion­al sup­port score was a 2.98 out of a pos­sible 7; 2 is the min­im­um ac­cept­able score set by HHS. Of 359 pro­viders as­sessed in 2013, the av­er­age in­struc­tion­al score was 2.72.

It’s not yet clear wheth­er the com­pet­it­ive pro­cess will en­cour­age new or­gan­iz­a­tions to chal­lenge ex­ist­ing pro­viders for Head Start fund­ing. John Hol­land, a Head Start teach­er and a Ph.D. re­search­er, cal­cu­lated that in 2012 most of the re­as­signed money went to ex­ist­ing Head Start pro­viders. “From a kids-eye per­spect­ive, there may not have been a lot of change,” says Mead. “Kids ended up in the same set­tings, it’s just that the money flows slightly dif­fer­ently.”

In Mary­land, the first round of com­pet­i­tion caused one non­profit in the south­ern part of the state to lose two of its three grants to loc­al pub­lic school dis­tricts. The city of Bal­timore, re­quired to com­pete be­cause of a prob­lem with in­tern­al mon­it­or­ing of fin­ances, was asked to ap­ply for a new type of grant. To­geth­er with four com­munity or­gan­iz­a­tions, the city ap­plied and won pre­lim­in­ary ap­prov­al for a $29 mil­lion ef­fort to co­ordin­ate early-child­hood edu­ca­tion city­wide.

Gain­ing a Head Start grant al­lowed the Cal­vert County school dis­trict to ex­pand its preschool ser­vices. “The 4-year-old chil­dren have the op­por­tun­ity to go to pre­kinder­garten half-day and Head Start half-day, to give them a whole day pro­gram,” says Cheryl Yates, su­per­visor of early-child­hood and adult edu­ca­tion for the dis­trict. Chil­dren were pre­vi­ously able to at­tend pub­lic school pre-K half-day and Head Start half-day, but not usu­ally in the same loc­a­tion.

If Bal­timore’s plan is ap­proved, the city’s pub­lic school pre-K pro­grams will ex­pand to serve 4-year olds who would oth­er­wise have gone to Head Start. Head Start will also be­come a full-day, full-year pro­gram for 3-year olds, and Early Head Start ser­vices will co­ordin­ate with a fed­er­ally fun­ded home vis­it­ing pro­gram for preg­nant wo­men.

Or­gan­iz­a­tions in­volved in Bal­timore’s plan are un­der a leg­al or­der not to talk about the de­tails un­til they are fi­nal­ized. St. Jerome’s, usu­ally open to giv­ing tours of its fa­cil­it­ies, de­clined to let Na­tion­al Journ­al see the in­side of a classroom, let alone speak to teach­ers and staff mem­bers.

“As a res­ult of the trig­gers for re­com­pet­i­tion, it’s changed how Head Start really looks at their op­er­a­tions,” says Shan­non Bur­roughs-Camp­bell, ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of Bal­timore City Head Start. “The use of CLASS … throughout classes and throughout pro­grams — to make sure that you’re meet­ing at least the ba­sic min­im­um level that would not trig­ger re­com­pet­i­tion — is crit­ic­al.”

It’s not just the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion that’s mov­ing to bring more ac­count­ab­il­ity to preschool and to provide the kind of edu­ca­tion to dis­ad­vant­aged chil­dren that can po­ten­tially shrink learn­ing dis­par­it­ies. “As states and gov­ern­ments at all levels in­vest more money in pre-K, you’re go­ing to see more de­sire for some kind of meas­ure­ment,” Mead says. The in­creased fed­er­al scru­tiny of Head Start pro­grams now un­fold­ing may be only the first tremors of much lar­ger changes ahead as more preschool pro­grams face that simple but power­ful ques­tion.

Cor­rec­tion: An earli­er ver­sion of this art­icle mis­stated John Hol­land’s job title.

What We're Following See More »
Rybicki Departs FBI
11 hours ago

"FBI Director Chris Wray will change his chief of staff in the coming weeks, multiple sources told CNN Tuesday. James Rybicki, who served Wray's predecessor, James Comey, in the same role, will soon leave, the sources said. Zachary Harmon, a white-collar lawyer, will take on the role." Rybicki played a "role in crafting a statement that exonerated Hillary Clinton in her email server investigation." In related news, the Washington Post reports that "Dana Boente, the U.S. attorney in the Eastern District of Virginia who is acting head of the Justice Department’s national security division, has been selected to be the FBI’s next general counsel."

Mueller Seeks to Interview Trump
12 hours ago

"Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III is seeking to question President Trump in the coming weeks about his decisions to oust national security adviser Michael Flynn and FBI Director James B. Comey, according to two people familiar with his plans. ... The president’s legal team hopes to provide Trump’s testimony in a hybrid form — answering some questions in a face-to-face interview and others in a written statement."

Feinstein, Schiff Call on Facebook, Twitter to Investigate “Release the Memo” Campaign
17 hours ago
Mueller Interviewed Sessions
18 hours ago
Trump Signs Spending Bill
1 days ago

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.