Cliven Bundy Just Ruined His Cause

After Bundy’s overtly racist remarks, let’s see how far politicians run away from him.

National Journal
Add to Briefcase
Brian Resnick
April 24, 2014, 4:15 a.m.

The New York Times has over­heard Cliven Bundy — the Nevada ranch­er who, in­stead of pay­ing dec­ades of over­due graz­ing fees, met the Bur­eau of Land man­age­ment with guns and a small mi­li­tia — say­ing this:

“I want to tell you one more thing I know about the Negro,” he said. Mr. Bundy re­called driv­ing past a pub­lic-hous­ing pro­ject in North Las Ve­gas, “and in front of that gov­ern­ment house the door was usu­ally open and the older people and the kids — and there is al­ways at least a half a dozen people sit­ting on the porch — they didn’t have noth­ing to do. They didn’t have noth­ing for their kids to do. They didn’t have noth­ing for their young girls to do.

“And be­cause they were ba­sic­ally on gov­ern­ment sub­sidy, so now what do they do?” he asked. “They abort their young chil­dren, they put their young men in jail, be­cause they nev­er learned how to pick cot­ton. And I’ve of­ten wondered, are they bet­ter off as slaves, pick­ing cot­ton and hav­ing a fam­ily life and do­ing things, or are they bet­ter off un­der gov­ern­ment sub­sidy? They didn’t get no more free­dom. They got less free­dom.”

Con­ser­vat­ive and liber­tari­an politi­cians have been sym­path­et­ic to­ward Bundy’s cause, fram­ing his protest as an act of pat­ri­ot­ism in the face of an over­step­ping gov­ern­ment. The graz­ing fees were re­lated to the En­dangered Spe­cies Act. Ranch­ers on pro­tec­ted fed­er­al land have to pay a fee if they want to use it. And most of the land in Nevada is owned by the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment. 

Ex­pect every politi­cian to back away from the is­sue.

“His re­marks on race are of­fens­ive and I whole­heartedly dis­agree with him,” Sen. Rand Paul said in a state­ment Thursday morn­ing.

But it was just Monday night when Paul offered a care­ful de­fense of Bundy’s ac­tions to Fox News. Say­ing that while break­ing the law is wrong, the gov­ern­ment should re­think its busi­ness man­aging graz­ing land. “I’m for obey­ing the law and I’m not for a vi­ol­ent out­come,” he said. “But with re­gard to the gen­er­al ques­tion, should the states have some prerog­at­ive in this, I think so.” 

Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id, who hasn’t had many kind words for Bundy be­fore Thursday, called the ranch­er a “hate­ful ra­cist” in a state­ment.

Sen. Ted Cruz has also ral­lied be­hind Bundy, say­ing the stan­doff “is the un­for­tu­nate and tra­gic cul­min­a­tion of the path that Pres­id­ent Obama has set the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment on.” He said the ad­min­is­tra­tion was “us­ing the jack­boot of au­thor­it­ari­an­ism to come against the cit­izens.”

Con­ser­vat­ive Fox News an­chor Sean Han­nity has had Bundy on his show mul­tiple times, and Bundy calls Han­nity one of his her­oes. 

Sen. Dean Heller, who the Times writes has called Bundy’s sup­port­ers “pat­ri­ots,” offered this re­sponse to the pa­per via a spokes­per­son. He “com­pletely dis­agrees with Mr. Bundy’s ap­palling and ra­cist state­ments, and con­demns them in the most strenu­ous way.”

Cor­rec­tion: An earli­er ver­sion of this story mis­pelled Sen. Dean Heller’s first name.

Contributions by Elahe Izad

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.