Federal experts blamed shoddy precautions and administrative practices for a leak at a New Mexico nuclear-waste site, the Associated Press reports.
A “degradation of key safety management and safety culture” was central to the Feb. 14 contamination breach at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, said Ted Wyka, head of the Energy Department Accident Investigation Board. He discussed panel findings that were scheduled for publication on Thursday.
“The bottom line is they failed to believe initial indications of the release,” Wyka said.
The site’s subterranean tunnels have remained off-limits to most personnel following the incident, which took place days after an unrelated vehicle fire. An advance crew on Wednesday re-entered a storage area where escaped radioactive material had been located last week, but the group did not find any indication that a ceiling had fallen or a waste barrel had ruptured.
Personnel took more than 10 hours to react to the initial alert in February, and a ventilation mechanism allowed unfiltered air to pass out of the facility, according to the Energy Department assessment. Investigators faulted follow-up actions by the department, as well as the site’s emergency preparedness, repair schedule, and a lack of plans for placing contamination sensors.
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Chairman Peter Winokur said 100 times more radiation might have drifted above ground had workers not reactivated a warning system disabled for roughly six days after the fire, the Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday.
An Energy Department spokeswoman said the agency “is assessing all aspects” of the fire and leak, and anticipates “some significant changes.”
Bob McQuinn, head of the contract firm Nuclear Waste Partnership, acknowledged faults in the response mounted by the facility’s operator, AP reported. He affirmed that reforms being made in administrative procedures, personnel preparations and other activities would “assure that every hazard that is posed by WIPP is examined.”
What We're Following See More »
Even though they dislike both of them, the American people want to know that its presidential candidates are healthy. "Nearly two-thirds of registered voters think presidential candidates should release details about their medical histories, according to a new Morning Consult poll." In the new poll, 64 percent of Americans say the candidates should release their medical reports, up nine percent from May.
In a speech Friday at the Federal Reserve's Jackson Hole summit, Fed chair Janet Yellen sounded an optimistic tone about the state of the American economy, before implying that a hike in interest rates is on the horizon. The Fed "continues to anticipate that gradual increases in the federal funds rate will be appropriate over time to achieve and sustain employment and inflation near our statutory objectives," Yellen said in her address.
While politicians argue over whether or not to be worried about potential voter fraud come November, a study tells us it is not a legitimate concern. "A News21 analysis four years ago of 2,068 alleged election-fraud cases in 50 states found that while some fraud had occurred since 2000, the rate was infinitesimal compared with the 146 million registered voters in that 12-year span. The analysis found only 10 cases of voter impersonation, the only kind of fraud that could be prevented by voter ID at the polls."
The Democratic National Committee's "influx of money" in July "owes in part to an unprecedented workaround of political spending limits that lets the party tap into millions of dollars more" from Hillary Clinton’s biggest donors. "At least $7.3 million of the DNC’s July total originated with payments from hundreds of major donors who had already contributed the maximum $33,400 to the national committee." Those payments were "first bundled by the Hillary Victory Fund and then transferred to the state Democratic parties, which effectively stripped the donors’ names and sent the money to the DNC as a lump sum."