EPA Chief Returns Fire in War Over Science

WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 20: Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Gina McCarthy addresses a breakfast event at the National Press Club September 20, 2013 in Washington, DC. McCarthy announced that the EPA is proposing regulations to limit greenhouse gas emissions, which requires future coal burning power plants to decrease 40 percent of their emission. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
National Journal
Jason Plautz
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Jason Plautz
April 28, 2014, 8:21 a.m.

En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency Ad­min­is­trat­or Gina Mc­Carthy fired back in the war over her agency’s sci­ence, slam­ming crit­ics who “man­u­fac­ture un­cer­tain­ties that stop us from tak­ing ur­gently needed cli­mate ac­tion.”

The agency’s sci­entif­ic stud­ies have be­come an in­creas­ingly con­veni­ent tar­get for in­dustry groups and con­gres­sion­al Re­pub­lic­ans bent on stop­ping EPA reg­u­la­tions. Re­pub­lic­ans have sub­poenaed sev­er­al health stud­ies that EPA re­lies on for its air-pol­lu­tion rules, and in­creas­ing at­ten­tion has been heaped on the agency’s sci­entif­ic re­view pan­els.

Speak­ing at the an­nu­al meet­ing of the Na­tion­al Academy of Sci­ences on Monday, Mc­Carthy went after the “small but vo­cal group of crit­ics” who she said were more in­ter­ested in “look­ing to cloud the sci­ence with un­cer­tainty “¦ to keep EPA from do­ing the very job that Con­gress gave us to do.”

Mc­Carthy also touched on the agency’s con­tro­ver­sial use of hu­man test­ing to meas­ure the im­pact of air pol­lu­tion, the sub­ject of a re­cent In­spect­or Gen­er­al re­port that largely said the agency fol­lowed prop­er pro­ced­ure. Crit­ics have said that the hu­man tests put the sub­jects at risk.

In her speech, Mc­Carthy countered that the hu­man tests helped sci­ent­ists to “bet­ter un­der­stand bio­lo­gic­al re­sponses to dif­fer­ent levels of air pol­lut­ants.”

“Sci­ence is real and veri­fi­able,” she said. “With the health of our fam­il­ies and our fu­tures at stake, the Amer­ic­an people ex­pect us to act on the facts, not spend pre­cious time and tax­pay­er money re­fut­ing man­u­fac­tured un­cer­tain­ties.”

What We're Following See More »
Trump Deposition Video Is Online
15 hours ago

The video of Donald Trump's deposition in his case against restaurateur Jeffrey Zakarian is now live. Slate's Jim Newell and Josh Voorhees are live-blogging it while they watch.

Debate Commission Admits Issues with Trump’s Mic
16 hours ago

The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.

Trump Deposition Video to Be Released
16 hours ago

"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."

Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
19 hours ago

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
1 days ago

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."