Insurance executives, state insurance commissioners, and federal officials debated the role of the federal government in America’s state-based insurance regulatory oversight model at a National Journal event Tuesday underwritten by Zurich.
Rep. Ed Royce, a Republican from California who believes greater federal oversight could lead to lower prices for consumers, said America’s fragmented insurance regulatory system — governed by the states — will leave the United States behind as the global market presses ahead.
“I’ve seen the enormous frustration on the European side in the regulatory community,” Royce said. “I’ve seen the frustration that the Europeans have felt in dealing with state insurance commissioners who are not on the same page.”
On a local level, state-by-state regulation hurts consumers because their plans aren’t portable, Royce said. Congress is soon addressing the problem faced by the military — the inability of troops who transfer to a different base to carry their plans with them — but even children who go to college still have trouble, Royce said.
“Having attended working groups over the years on the question of insurance and compatibility across markets, I have watched that struggle in the U.S.,” Royce said.
Royce, along with Michael McRaith, the director of the Federal Insurance Office, delivered the keynote addresses at the event in The Hamilton in Washington.
McRaith said that the federal government already plays an important supervisory role in regulating the insurance industry, and that it makes sense for states to take the lead because state insurance departments provide important local support for consumers.
“We should be supportive of efforts to develop international standards and encourage a level playing field [for U.S. insurance companies],” McRaith said.
“We need to build on the strengths of the state system,” he said. “The federal government plays an important role, but we did not call for a federal regulator.”
National Journal‘s Nancy Cook, economic and domestic policy correspondent, moderated the event.
What We're Following See More »
"The Obama administration on Tuesday called on U.S. states to ban agreements prohibiting many workers from moving to their employers’ rivals, saying it would lead to a more competitive labor market and faster wage growth. The administration said so-called non-compete agreements interfere with worker mobility and states should consider barring companies from requiring low-wage workers and other employees who are not privy to trade secrets or other special circumstances to sign them."
House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz plans to spend "years, come January, probing the record of a President Hillary Clinton." Chaffetz told the Washington Post: “It’s a target-rich environment. Even before we get to Day One, we’ve got two years’ worth of material already lined up. She has four years of history at the State Department, and it ain’t good.”
Hillary Clinton's transition team has in place strict rules to limit the influence that lobbyists could have "in crafting the nominee’s policy agenda." The move makes it unlikely, at least for now, that Clinton would overturn Obama's executive order limiting the role that lobbyists play in government
Federal employees from 14 agencies have given nearly $2 million in campaign donations in the presidential race thus far, and 95 percent of the donations, totaling $1.9 million, have been to the Clinton campaign. Employees at the State Department, which Clinton lead for four years, has given 99 percent of its donations to the Democratic nominee.