Panel Advocates Deeper U.S.-Russian Nuclear Cuts, Despite Tensions

A Ukrainian soldier stands guard on Sunday at a checkpoint near the eastern Ukrainian city of Slavyansk. Arms-control advocates on Monday said Russia and the United States should continue discussing new nuclear-weapon curbs, despite significant tensions.
National Journal
Diane Barnes
Add to Briefcase
Diane Barnes
April 29, 2014, 6:28 a.m.

Arms-con­trol pro­ponents are ur­ging Wash­ing­ton and Mo­scow not to stop dis­cuss­ing new nuc­le­ar-weapon curbs, as ten­sions soar between the cap­it­als.

A so-called “Deep Cuts Com­mis­sion” ad­voc­ated steps such as curb­ing the read­i­ness of the former Cold War rivals’ nuc­le­ar weapons to fire on a mo­ment’s no­tice, as well as re­du­cing long-range war­head de­ploy­ments bey­ond levels man­dated by the 2011 New START agree­ment.

In an in­aug­ur­al re­port is­sued on Monday, the group of in­de­pend­ent ana­lysts and former of­fi­cials as­ser­ted that mis­trust between Rus­sia and the United States over mil­it­ary man­euvers in Ukraine un­der­scores a need for the two gov­ern­ments to jointly con­sider how they can re­duce the risk of a nuc­le­ar ex­change.

“The cur­rent polit­ic­al en­vir­on­ment is any­thing but con­du­cive” to achiev­ing sig­ni­fic­ant nuc­le­ar-arms curbs, ac­cord­ing to the pan­el com­posed of 21 ex­perts from Rus­sia, the United States and Ger­many.

Its mem­bers in­clude former Rus­si­an stra­tegic mis­sile forces chief of staff Vic­tor Yes­in, one-time White House Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Coun­cil of­fi­cial Cath­er­ine Kelle­her, and Oliv­er Mei­er, who worked for former Ger­man law­maker Uta Za­pf when she chaired the par­lia­ment’s For­eign Af­fairs Dis­arm­a­ment, Arms Con­trol and Non­pro­lif­er­a­tion Sub­com­mit­tee.

Pulling back from dia­logue could lead to a “harden­ing of each side’s ex­ist­ing po­s­i­tions” that would com­plic­ate any fu­ture nuc­le­ar-re­duc­tion talks and in­crease the po­ten­tial for “mis­un­der­stand­ings,” the group stated in its find­ings.

The au­thors sug­ges­ted that in the ab­sence of new arms-con­trol talks, Rus­sia may in­creas­ingly rely on nuc­le­ar weapons to coun­ter­bal­ance Wash­ing­ton’s “grow­ing tech­no­lo­gic­al edge” in the de­vel­op­ment of mis­sile de­fense sys­tems, con­ven­tion­al long-range strike cap­ab­il­it­ies and po­ten­tial space-based weapons.

The pan­el re­af­firmed in its re­port all of the re­com­mend­a­tions it de­vised in in­tern­al de­lib­er­a­tions in the months be­fore Rus­sia’s an­nex­a­tion of Ukraine’s Crimea re­gion. The group’s ad­vice calls in part for ac­tions to meet New START re­duc­tion tar­gets well ahead of a 2018 dead­line, and for re­newed ef­forts to de­vel­op trust on en­trenched dis­putes over mis­sile de­fense, non­stra­tegic nuc­le­ar arms and long-range con­ven­tion­al cap­ab­il­it­ies.

“The value of such meas­ures in put­ting tight­er con­straints on nuc­le­ar arms be­comes all the more ap­par­ent in times of ten­sion,” Steven Pifer, a com­mis­sion mem­ber and a Brook­ings In­sti­tu­tion seni­or fel­low, said in re­leased com­ments.

Cor­rec­tion: This art­icle in­cludes cor­rec­ted text de­scrib­ing a po­s­i­tion earli­er held by Oliv­er Mei­er.

What We're Following See More »
TWO MONTHS AFTER REFUSING AT CONVENTION
Cruz to Back Trump
1 days ago
THE LATEST
WHO TO BELIEVE?
Two Polls for Clinton, One for Trump
1 days ago
THE LATEST

With three days until the first debate, the polls are coming fast and furious. The latest round:

  • An Associated Press/Gfk poll of registered voters found very few voters committed, with Clin­ton lead­ing Trump, 37% to 29%, and Gary John­son at 7%.
  • A Mc­Clatchy-Mar­ist poll gave Clin­ton a six-point edge, 45% to 39%, in a four-way bal­lot test. Johnson pulls 10% support, with Jill Stein at 4%.
  • Rasmussen, which has drawn criticism for continually showing Donald Trump doing much better than he does in other polls, is at it again. A new survey gives Trump a five-point lead, 44%-39%.
NO SURPRISE
Trump Eschewing Briefing Materials in Debate Prep
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

In contrast to Hillary Clinton's meticulous debate practice sessions, Donald Trump "is largely shun­ning tra­di­tion­al de­bate pre­par­a­tions, but has been watch­ing video of…Clin­ton’s best and worst de­bate mo­ments, look­ing for her vul­ner­ab­il­it­ies.” Trump “has paid only curs­ory at­ten­tion to brief­ing ma­ter­i­als. He has re­fused to use lecterns in mock de­bate ses­sions des­pite the ur­ging of his ad­visers. He prefers spit­balling ideas with his team rather than hon­ing them in­to crisp, two-minute an­swers.”

Source:
TRUMP NO HABLA ESPANOL
Trump Makes No Outreach to Spanish Speakers
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Donald Trump "is on the precipice of becoming the only major-party presidential candidate this century not to reach out to millions of American voters whose dominant, first or just preferred language is Spanish. Trump has not only failed to buy any Spanish-language television or radio ads, he so far has avoided even offering a translation of his website into Spanish, breaking with two decades of bipartisan tradition."

Source:
$1.16 MILLION
Clintons Buy the House Next Door in Chappaqua
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Bill and Hillary Clinton have purchased the home next door to their primary residence in tony Chappaqua, New York, for $1.16 million. "By purchasing the new home, the Clinton's now own the entire cul-de-sac at the end of the road in the leafy New York suburb. The purchase makes it easier for the United States Secret Service to protect the former president and possible future commander in chief."

Source:
×