Top Cable Lobbyist: Don’t Make the Internet a Utility

The former FCC chairman battles a new push for regulation.

President and CEO of National Cable & Telecommunications Association Michael Powell speaks at the 30th Annual Walter Kaitz Foundation Fundraising Dinner at The New York Marriott Marquis on October 9, 2013 in New York City.
National Journal
Brendan Sasso
Add to Briefcase
Brendan Sasso
April 29, 2014, 1:04 p.m.

Treat­ing high-speed In­ter­net net­works as util­it­ies would strangle their growth, the top lob­by­ist for the cable in­dustry warned Tues­day.

Mi­chael Pow­ell, the head of the Na­tion­al Cable and Tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions As­so­ci­ation, ac­know­ledged the “in­tu­it­ive ap­peal” of ap­ply­ing util­ity-style reg­u­la­tions to In­ter­net ser­vice pro­viders. In many ways, the In­ter­net has be­come as cent­ral to our lives as roads and elec­tri­city, he said.

But he ar­gued that gov­ern­ment in­ter­ven­tion has de­graded oth­er ser­vices and would only dampen in­vest­ment in broad­band net­works, lead­ing to slower speeds and less ac­cess.

“The potholes vis­ible through your wind­shield, the shiver you feel in a cold house after a snowstorm knocks out the power, and the wa­ter main breaks along your com­mute should re­strain one from em­bra­cing the il­lus­ory vir­tues of pub­lic-util­ity reg­u­la­tion,” Pow­ell, a former chair­man of the Fed­er­al Com­mu­nic­a­tions Com­mis­sion dur­ing the Bush ad­min­is­tra­tion, said in his speech at NCTA’s an­nu­al show in Los Angeles.

He cited stat­ist­ics show­ing that large por­tions of U.S. roads and bridges are in poor con­di­tion. The wa­ter in­fra­struc­ture needs $1 tril­lion in im­prove­ments, and the elec­tric grid needs $768 bil­lion, Pow­ell said.

“Be­cause the In­ter­net is not reg­u­lated as a pub­lic util­ity, it grows and thrives, watered by private cap­it­al and a light reg­u­lat­ory touch,” he said. His group lob­bies for Com­cast, Time Warner Cable, Charter, Cox, and oth­er cable TV and broad­band In­ter­net pro­viders.

Pow­ell’s com­ments come as an ar­ray of lib­er­al ad­vocacy groups are lob­by­ing the FCC to treat broad­band pro­viders the same way it treats tele­phone util­it­ies.

In 2002, as FCC chair­man, Pow­ell clas­si­fied cable-mo­dem In­ter­net ac­cess as an “in­form­a­tion ser­vice” in­stead of a “tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions ser­vice.” The move dra­mat­ic­ally han­di­capped the FCC’s abil­ity to reg­u­late high-speed In­ter­net ac­cess.

In Janu­ary, the D.C. Cir­cuit Court of Ap­peals struck down the FCC’s con­tro­ver­sial net-neut­ral­ity rules. The reg­u­la­tions, first ad­op­ted in 2010, pro­hib­ited In­ter­net ser­vice pro­viders from block­ing web­sites or any “un­reas­on­able” dis­crim­in­a­tion of In­ter­net traffic. The rules were in­ten­ded to en­sure that In­ter­net pro­viders can’t act as “gate­keep­ers” and con­trol what in­form­a­tion people ac­cess on­line.

The court said the FCC was es­sen­tially try­ing to ap­ply a util­ity-style reg­u­la­tion to the In­ter­net. To ad­opt those reg­u­la­tions, the FCC would have to first re­verse Pow­ell’s 2002 de­cision and clas­si­fy broad­band as a “tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions ser­vice.”

In­stead of re­clas­si­fy­ing, cur­rent FCC Chair­man Tom Wheel­er (who headed NCTA from 1976 to 1984) is try­ing to re­work the rules un­der the cur­rent au­thor­ity. To com­ply with the court rul­ing, the new rules will have to be looser.

Un­der Wheel­er’s new pro­pos­al, ISPs would still be barred from block­ing web­sites, but they could charge web­sites for faster ser­vice as long as the ar­range­ments are “com­mer­cially reas­on­able.”

Matt Wood, the policy dir­ect­or for ad­vocacy group Free Press, ar­gued that the FCC should re­clas­si­fy broad­band as a “tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions ser­vice” and en­act tough net-neut­ral­ity rules.

“It would put us back on sol­id foot­ing where we’re not pre­tend­ing that broad­band com­mu­nic­a­tions net­works are some­how not com­mu­nic­a­tions net­works,” Wood said.

“Broad­band is es­sen­tial. It’s the open­ing price for par­ti­cip­at­ing today in our eco­nomy and our demo­cracy.”

In a blog post on Tues­day, Wheel­er em­phas­ized that re­clas­si­fy­ing broad­band as a Title II “tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions ser­vice” re­mains on the table.

“If the pro­pos­al be­fore us now turns out to be in­suf­fi­cient, or if we ob­serve any­one tak­ing ad­vant­age of the rule, I won’t hes­it­ate to use Title II,” Wheel­er wrote. 

What We're Following See More »
CITES CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Lieberman Withdraws from Consideration for FBI Job
4 days ago
THE LATEST
MINIMUM 2 PERCENT GDP
Trump Tells NATO Countries To Pay Up
4 days ago
BREAKING
MANAFORT AND FLYNN
Russians Discussed Influencing Trump Through Aides
4 days ago
THE DETAILS

"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Source:
BUT WHITE HOUSE MAY USE AGAINST HIM ANYWAY
Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
6 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Source:
BUSINESSES CAN’T PLEAD FIFTH
Senate Intel to Subpoena Two of Flynn’s Businesses
6 days ago
THE LATEST

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login