There is one solution to fighting Medicare fraud that most lawmakers can agree on: Remove seniors’ Social Security numbers from their Medicare cards to stop identity theft.
But they can’t agree with federal agencies on how to pay for it.
The House Ways and Means Committee held a meeting Wednesday to discuss the best way to protect seniors from theft and abuse. Two different solutions have been proposed: an outright requirement that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services take the numbers off of the cards, and an alternative to the current cards — a “smart card,” if you will — that contains the data securely.
Yet neither has been enacted. Why?
Money. To change the current system, which services roughly 50 million seniors, CMS would need a hefty sum. There’s the overhead of producing new cards and, if the smart cards were adopted, educating seniors and physicians about how to use their new pieces of plastic.
“While [CMS] agrees that removing the Social Security numbers from the Medicare card is an appropriate step to reducing the risk of identity theft, CMS cannot make a decision to proceed unilaterally,” a CMS official said in an email. “CMS, the Social Security Administration, and the Railroad Retirement Board must all agree to proceed with the initiative, and to consider all existing workloads and priorities in light of the funding that is available for such a major project.”
The Government Accountability Office is reviewing the smart-card proposal — retiring Republican Rep. Jim Gerlach’s Medicare Common Access Card Act — and is expected to complete its analysis of the administrative and cost burden to enact the program by the end of the year.
It’s not clear the GAO report will resolve the disagreement over funding for removing Social Security numbers from cards, though. According to an aide for Republican Rep. Sam Johnson, who is cosponsoring the bipartisan bill to remove Social Security numbers from the current cards, CMS wants an appropriation but Congress thinks the agency can carry out the change in a fiscally responsible fashion using its own resources.
“CMS has been working with the committee to find a mutually acceptable solution,” a spokesman said in an email.
What We're Following See More »
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has released its score of the House-passed American Health Care Act, which would replace Obamacare. According to the CBO, the bill would reduce the deficit by $119 billion by 2026, while leaving 14 million more Americans uninsured in 2018 than under current law, a number swelling to 23 million by 2026. Further, insurance premiums would balloon 20 percent in 2018 and five percent in 2019 before the waiver provision in the legislation would kick in. The provision allows states to apply for waivers and permit insurers to offer skimpier plans, which would likely entice younger and healthier individuals to buy health insurance while potentially pricing older and less healthy Americans out of insurance plans. House Republicans approved this bill in late April without waiting for the CBO score.
Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham said Wednesday during a Senate Appropriations subcommittee hearing that President Donald Trump's budget is little more than recycling bin material. "The budget proposed by the president doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell of passing," Graham said. Graham had previously opposed the budget over its nearly 30 percent cut to the budget of the State Department. The budget slashes spending on domestic priorities while increasing military spending.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said Wednesday that he doesn't yet know the formula towards gaining passage of an Obamacare replacement in the Senate. "I don't know how we get to 50 (votes) at the moment. But that's the goal," McConnell said. The House passed an Obamacare replacement bill which has been widely seen as dead on arrival in the Senate, and McConnell has put together a working group of Republican Senators working towards creating health care legislation which could gain the support of at least 50 Senators.
"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."