There is one solution to fighting Medicare fraud that most lawmakers can agree on: Remove seniors’ Social Security numbers from their Medicare cards to stop identity theft.
But they can’t agree with federal agencies on how to pay for it.
The House Ways and Means Committee held a meeting Wednesday to discuss the best way to protect seniors from theft and abuse. Two different solutions have been proposed: an outright requirement that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services take the numbers off of the cards, and an alternative to the current cards — a “smart card,” if you will — that contains the data securely.
Yet neither has been enacted. Why?
Money. To change the current system, which services roughly 50 million seniors, CMS would need a hefty sum. There’s the overhead of producing new cards and, if the smart cards were adopted, educating seniors and physicians about how to use their new pieces of plastic.
“While [CMS] agrees that removing the Social Security numbers from the Medicare card is an appropriate step to reducing the risk of identity theft, CMS cannot make a decision to proceed unilaterally,” a CMS official said in an email. “CMS, the Social Security Administration, and the Railroad Retirement Board must all agree to proceed with the initiative, and to consider all existing workloads and priorities in light of the funding that is available for such a major project.”
The Government Accountability Office is reviewing the smart-card proposal — retiring Republican Rep. Jim Gerlach’s Medicare Common Access Card Act — and is expected to complete its analysis of the administrative and cost burden to enact the program by the end of the year.
It’s not clear the GAO report will resolve the disagreement over funding for removing Social Security numbers from cards, though. According to an aide for Republican Rep. Sam Johnson, who is cosponsoring the bipartisan bill to remove Social Security numbers from the current cards, CMS wants an appropriation but Congress thinks the agency can carry out the change in a fiscally responsible fashion using its own resources.
“CMS has been working with the committee to find a mutually acceptable solution,” a spokesman said in an email.
What We're Following See More »
"A new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll found that 34% of registered voters think the three presidential debates would be extremely or quite important in helping them decide whom to support for president. About 11% of voters are considered 'debate persuadables'—that is, they think the debates are important and are either third-party voters or only loosely committed to either major-party candidate."
Will he or won't he? That's the question surrounding Donald Trump and his on-again, off-again threats to bring onetime Bill Clinton paramour Gennifer Flowers to the debate as his guest. An assistant to flowers initially said she'd be there, but Trump campaign chief Kellyanne Conway "said on ABC’s 'This Week' that the Trump campaign had not invited Flowers to the debate, but she didn’t rule out the possibility of Flowers being in the audience."
NBC's Lester Holt hasn't hosted the "Nightly News" since Tuesday, as he's prepped for moderating the first presidential debate tonight—and the first of his career. He's called on a host of NBC talent to help him, namely NBC News and MSNBC chairman Andy Lack; NBC News president Deborah Turness; the news division's senior vice president of editorial, Janelle Rodriguez; "Nightly News" producer Sam Singal, "Meet the Press" host Chuck Todd, senior political editor Mark Murray and political editor Carrie Dann. But during the debate itself, the only person in Holt's earpiece will be longtime debate producer Marty Slutsky.
"The House passed legislation late Thursday that would prohibit the federal government from making any cash payments to Iran, in protest of President Obama's recently discovered decision to pay Iran $1.7 billion in cash in January. And while the White House has said Obama would veto the bill, 16 Democrats joined with Republicans to pass the measure, 254-163."
In contrast to Hillary Clinton's meticulous debate practice sessions, Donald Trump "is largely shunning traditional debate preparations, but has been watching video of…Clinton’s best and worst debate moments, looking for her vulnerabilities.” Trump “has paid only cursory attention to briefing materials. He has refused to use lecterns in mock debate sessions despite the urging of his advisers. He prefers spitballing ideas with his team rather than honing them into crisp, two-minute answers.”