There is one solution to fighting Medicare fraud that most lawmakers can agree on: Remove seniors’ Social Security numbers from their Medicare cards to stop identity theft.
But they can’t agree with federal agencies on how to pay for it.
The House Ways and Means Committee held a meeting Wednesday to discuss the best way to protect seniors from theft and abuse. Two different solutions have been proposed: an outright requirement that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services take the numbers off of the cards, and an alternative to the current cards — a “smart card,” if you will — that contains the data securely.
Yet neither has been enacted. Why?
Money. To change the current system, which services roughly 50 million seniors, CMS would need a hefty sum. There’s the overhead of producing new cards and, if the smart cards were adopted, educating seniors and physicians about how to use their new pieces of plastic.
“While [CMS] agrees that removing the Social Security numbers from the Medicare card is an appropriate step to reducing the risk of identity theft, CMS cannot make a decision to proceed unilaterally,” a CMS official said in an email. “CMS, the Social Security Administration, and the Railroad Retirement Board must all agree to proceed with the initiative, and to consider all existing workloads and priorities in light of the funding that is available for such a major project.”
The Government Accountability Office is reviewing the smart-card proposal — retiring Republican Rep. Jim Gerlach’s Medicare Common Access Card Act — and is expected to complete its analysis of the administrative and cost burden to enact the program by the end of the year.
It’s not clear the GAO report will resolve the disagreement over funding for removing Social Security numbers from cards, though. According to an aide for Republican Rep. Sam Johnson, who is cosponsoring the bipartisan bill to remove Social Security numbers from the current cards, CMS wants an appropriation but Congress thinks the agency can carry out the change in a fiscally responsible fashion using its own resources.
“CMS has been working with the committee to find a mutually acceptable solution,” a spokesman said in an email.
What We're Following See More »
The national polls, once again, tell very different stories: Clinton leads by just one point in the IBD, Rasmussen, and LA Times tracking polls, while she shows a commanding 12 point lead in the ABC news poll and a smaller but sizable five point lead in the CNN poll. The Republican Remington Research Group released a slew of polls showing Trump up in Ohio, Nevada, and North Carolina, a tie in Florida, and Clinton leads in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Virginia. However, an independent Siena poll shows Clinton up 7 in North Carolina, while a Monmouth poll shows Trump up one in Arizona
Since the release of the Access Hollywood tape, on which Donald Trump boasted of sexually assaulting women, "Senate Republicans have seen their fortunes dip, particularly in states like Florida, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Nevada and Pennsylvania," where Hillary Clinton now leads. Jennifer Duffy writes that she now expects Democrats to gain five to seven seats—enough to regain control of the chamber.
"Of the Senate seats in the Toss Up column, Trump only leads in Indiana and Missouri where both Republicans are running a few points behind him. ... History shows that races in the Toss Up column never split down the middle; one party tends to win the lion’s share of them."
"Some Republicans are running so far away from their party’s nominee that they are threatening to sue TV stations for running ads that suggest they support Donald Trump. Just two weeks before Election Day, five Republicans―Reps. Bob Dold (R-Ill.), Mike Coffman (R-Colo.), David Jolly (R-Fla.), John Katko (R-N.Y.) and Brian Fitzpatrick, a Pennsylvania Republican running for an open seat that’s currently occupied by his brother―contend that certain commercials paid for by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee provide false or misleading information by connecting them to the GOP nominee. Trump is so terrible, these Republicans are essentially arguing, that tying them to him amounts to defamation."
Former Illinois GOP Congressman Aaron Schock "recently agreed to pay a $10,000 fine for making an excessive solicitation for a super PAC that was active in his home state of Illinois four years ago." Schock resigned from Congress after a story about his Downton Abbey-themed congressional office raised questions about how he was using taxpayer dollars.