One Thing Congress Can Agree on: Shielding Seniors From Medicare Fraud

An auxiliary nurse assists a patient in a geriatric unit at the hospital in Angers, western France, on October 23, 2013. The Angers hospital employs 6,000 people including 980 doctors.
National Journal
Clara Ritger
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Clara Ritger
May 1, 2014, 6:21 a.m.

There is one solu­tion to fight­ing Medi­care fraud that most law­makers can agree on: Re­move seni­ors’ So­cial Se­cur­ity num­bers from their Medi­care cards to stop iden­tity theft.

But they can’t agree with fed­er­al agen­cies on how to pay for it.

The House Ways and Means Com­mit­tee held a meet­ing Wed­nes­day to dis­cuss the best way to pro­tect seni­ors from theft and ab­use. Two dif­fer­ent solu­tions have been pro­posed: an out­right re­quire­ment that the Cen­ters for Medi­care and Medi­caid Ser­vices take the num­bers off of the cards, and an al­tern­at­ive to the cur­rent cards — a “smart card,” if you will — that con­tains the data se­curely.

Yet neither has been en­acted. Why?

Money. To change the cur­rent sys­tem, which ser­vices roughly 50 mil­lion seni­ors, CMS would need a hefty sum. There’s the over­head of pro­du­cing new cards and, if the smart cards were ad­op­ted, edu­cat­ing seni­ors and phys­i­cians about how to use their new pieces of plastic.

“While [CMS] agrees that re­mov­ing the So­cial Se­cur­ity num­bers from the Medi­care card is an ap­pro­pri­ate step to re­du­cing the risk of iden­tity theft, CMS can­not make a de­cision to pro­ceed uni­lat­er­ally,” a CMS of­fi­cial said in an email. “CMS, the So­cial Se­cur­ity Ad­min­is­tra­tion, and the Rail­road Re­tire­ment Board must all agree to pro­ceed with the ini­ti­at­ive, and to con­sider all ex­ist­ing work­loads and pri­or­it­ies in light of the fund­ing that is avail­able for such a ma­jor pro­ject.”

The Gov­ern­ment Ac­count­ab­il­ity Of­fice is re­view­ing the smart-card pro­pos­al — re­tir­ing Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Jim Ger­lach’s Medi­care Com­mon Ac­cess Card Act — and is ex­pec­ted to com­plete its ana­lys­is of the ad­min­is­trat­ive and cost bur­den to en­act the pro­gram by the end of the year.

It’s not clear the GAO re­port will re­solve the dis­agree­ment over fund­ing for re­mov­ing So­cial Se­cur­ity num­bers from cards, though. Ac­cord­ing to an aide for Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Sam John­son, who is co­spon­sor­ing the bi­par­tis­an bill to re­move So­cial Se­cur­ity num­bers from the cur­rent cards, CMS wants an ap­pro­pri­ation but Con­gress thinks the agency can carry out the change in a fisc­ally re­spons­ible fash­ion us­ing its own re­sources.

“CMS has been work­ing with the com­mit­tee to find a mu­tu­ally ac­cept­able solu­tion,” a spokes­man said in an email.

What We're Following See More »
Republican Polling Shows Close Race
Roundup: National Polling Remains Inconsistent
4 hours ago

The national polls, once again, tell very different stories: Clinton leads by just one point in the IBD, Rasmussen, and LA Times tracking polls, while she shows a commanding 12 point lead in the ABC news poll and a smaller but sizable five point lead in the CNN poll. The Republican Remington Research Group released a slew of polls showing Trump up in Ohio, Nevada, and North Carolina, a tie in Florida, and Clinton leads in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Virginia. However, an independent Siena poll shows Clinton up 7 in North Carolina, while a Monmouth poll shows Trump up one in Arizona

Colin Powell to Vote for Clinton
7 hours ago
Cook Report: Dems to Pick up 5-7 Seats, Retake Senate
9 hours ago

Since the release of the Access Hollywood tape, on which Donald Trump boasted of sexually assaulting women, "Senate Republicans have seen their fortunes dip, particularly in states like Florida, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Nevada and Pennsylvania," where Hillary Clinton now leads. Jennifer Duffy writes that she now expects Democrats to gain five to seven seats—enough to regain control of the chamber.

"Of the Senate seats in the Toss Up column, Trump only leads in Indiana and Missouri where both Republicans are running a few points behind him. ... History shows that races in the Toss Up column never split down the middle; one party tends to win the lion’s share of them."

Tying Republicans to Trump Now an Actionable Offense
11 hours ago

"Some Republicans are running so far away from their party’s nominee that they are threatening to sue TV stations for running ads that suggest they support Donald Trump. Just two weeks before Election Day, five Republicans―Reps. Bob Dold (R-Ill.), Mike Coffman (R-Colo.), David Jolly (R-Fla.), John Katko (R-N.Y.) and Brian Fitzpatrick, a Pennsylvania Republican running for an open seat that’s currently occupied by his brother―contend that certain commercials paid for by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee provide false or misleading information by connecting them to the GOP nominee. Trump is so terrible, these Republicans are essentially arguing, that tying them to him amounts to defamation."

Former Congressman Schock Fined $10,000
11 hours ago

Former Illinois GOP Congressman Aaron Schock "recently agreed to pay a $10,000 fine for making an excessive solicitation for a super PAC that was active in his home state of Illinois four years ago." Schock resigned from Congress after a story about his Downton Abbey-themed congressional office raised questions about how he was using taxpayer dollars.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.