House to Advance Bill to End Mass NSA Surveillance

The USA Freedom Act, with more than 140 cosponsors, will get a vote in the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday.

Activists protest the surveillance of U.S. citizens by the NSA outside the Justice Department where President Barack Obama gave a major speech on reforming the NSA January 17, 2014.
National Journal
Dustin Volz
May 5, 2014, 9:17 a.m.

A bill that would ef­fect­ively end one of the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency’s most con­tro­ver­sial spy pro­grams is fi­nally get­ting its day in con­gres­sion­al court.

The House Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee will hold a markup of an amended ver­sion of the USA Free­dom Act on Wed­nes­day, a sur­pris­ing and sud­den move that would es­sen­tially nul­li­fy the gov­ern­ment’s abil­ity to col­lect bulk metadata of Amer­ic­ans’ phone re­cords.

The manuever may also be a counter to plans the House In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee has to push for­ward a com­pet­ing bill that pri­vacy ad­voc­ates say would not go far enough to curb the gov­ern­ment’s sweep­ing sur­veil­lance pro­grams.

In­deed, just hours after the Free­dom Act earned a markup date, the In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee an­nounced it, too, would move for­ward with a markup of its own NSA bill — the FISA Trans­par­ency and Mod­ern­iz­a­tion Act — on Thursday.

The more ag­gress­ive Free­dom Act is sponsored by Rep. Jim Sensen­bren­ner, the one-time mas­ter­mind be­hind the post-9/11 Pat­ri­ot Act, from which both the Obama and Bush ad­min­is­tra­tions have de­rived much of the leg­al au­thor­ity for their sur­veil­lance pro­grams. Sensen­bren­ner, a Wis­con­sin Re­pub­lic­an, has vo­cally con­demned NSA spy­ing since Ed­ward Snowden’s leaks sur­faced last June. The bill has long been sup­por­ted by pri­vacy and civil-liber­ties groups who view it as the best le­gis­lat­ive re­form pack­age in Con­gress.

A man­ager’s amend­ment has been pos­ted to House Ju­di­ciary’s web­site that a source close to the ne­go­ti­ations said is a “com­prom­ise” on the Free­dom Act. The “bi­par­tis­an sub­sti­tute” from House Ju­di­ciary Chair­man Bob Good­latte; Rep. John Con­yers, the pan­el’s top Demo­crat; and oth­ers would pro­hib­it the bulk col­lec­tion of data un­der Sec­tion 215 of the Pat­ri­ot Act but keep in­tact the “rel­ev­ancy” stand­ard for col­lec­tion au­thor­ity. The ori­gin­al Free­dom Act had sought to com­pletely re­write the rel­ev­ancy stand­ard.

But the bill does grant the gov­ern­ment “emer­gency au­thor­ity” to use Sec­tion 215 for “tan­gible things.”

“The at­tor­ney gen­er­al may au­thor­ize the emer­gency pro­duc­tion of tan­gible things, provided that such an ap­plic­a­tion is presen­ted to the court with­in sev­en days,” a sec­tion-by-sec­tion break­down of the amend­ment reads. “If the court denies an emer­gency ap­plic­a­tion, the gov­ern­ment may not use any of the in­form­a­tion ob­tained un­der the emer­gency au­thor­ity ex­cept in in­stances of a threat of death or ser­i­ous bod­ily harm.”

In ad­di­tion, the com­prom­ise lan­guage would ad­opt new stand­ards for na­tion­al se­cur­ity let­ters, which are used by the FBI, and make the For­eign In­tel­li­gence Sur­veil­lance Court more trans­par­ent. The court, which over­sees the NSA’s spy­ing activ­it­ies, has been cri­ti­cized for not be­ing a ro­bust check against the agency.

The bill would also provide com­pan­ies that give the gov­ern­ment ac­cess to its stored metadata some li­ab­il­ity pro­tec­tion and al­low them to seek com­pens­a­tion for com­ply­ing.

The swift move fol­lows a jur­is­dic­tion­al squabble last month between the House Ju­di­ciary and House In­tel­li­gence com­mit­tees. Some Ju­di­ciary mem­bers, who are among the most vo­cal NSA crit­ics in Con­gress, said they were be­ing in­ten­tion­ally side­lined after the House par­lia­ment­ari­an gave primary jur­is­dic­tion of a an­oth­er sur­veil­lance re­form bill to the In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee in­stead of Ju­di­ciary.

In a joint state­ment, sev­er­al Ju­di­ciary mem­bers, in­clud­ing Good­latte, Con­yers, and Sensen­bren­ner, said they “as the com­mit­tee of primary jur­is­dic­tion” on in­tel­li­gence mat­ters have con­cluded that the NSA’s sweep­ing spy pro­grams are need in need of re­form.

“Over the past sev­er­al months, we have worked to­geth­er across party lines and with the ad­min­is­tra­tion and have reached a bi­par­tis­an solu­tion that in­cludes real pro­tec­tions for Amer­ic­ans’ civil liber­ties, ro­bust over­sight, and ad­di­tion­al trans­par­ency, while pre­serving our abil­ity to pro­tect Amer­ica’s na­tion­al se­cur­ity,” the law­makers said. “We look for­ward to tak­ing up this le­gis­la­tion on Wed­nes­day and con­tinu­ing to work with House lead­ers to re­form these pro­grams.”

But the House In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee struck back just as quickly on Monday. Hours after the Ju­di­ciary’s sur­prise, the in­tel­li­gence pan­el an­nounced it would vote on its own NSA bill on Thursday.

In Janu­ary, Pres­id­ent Obama an­nounced his ad­min­is­tra­tion would re­form the way NSA col­lects and stores tele­phone metadata, which in­cludes phone num­bers and call dur­a­tions but not the con­tents of a call, of vir­tu­ally all Amer­ic­ans.

The com­prom­ise lan­guage re­vealed by the House Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee ap­pears to be an at­tempt to align more closely with the way for­ward the pres­id­ent has out­lined. Obama has said he can­not act be­fore Con­gress gives him a bill that closely re­sembles his pre­ferred re­forms.

The Free­dom Act has 143 co­spon­sors in the House and a mir­ror bill in the Sen­ate sponsored by Patrick Leahy, a Ver­mont Demo­crat and chair­man of the Sen­ate Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4931) }}

What We're Following See More »
Ryan Not Endorsing Trump Just Yet
25 minutes ago
U.S. Capitol Doesn’t Meet Standards for New Moms
1 hours ago

"The U.S. Capitol does not meet the federal government’s own standards for accommodations for new mothers," according to an investigation by NBC Channel 4. "Though the U.S. General Services Administration, a government agency which oversees the management of federal government buildings, requires a minimum number of lactation stations and changing tables, Congress is exempt from the rules and fails to meet those standards." The Capitol grounds have 12 lactations stations, far short of the 42 that would be required given the number of female workers there.

State Dept. Review Faults Clinton Email Management
2 hours ago

"A State Department audit has faulted Hillary Clinton and previous secretaries of state for poorly managing email and other computer information and slowly responding to new cybersecurity risks. ... It cites 'longstanding, systemic weaknesses' related to communications. These started before Clinton's appointment as secretary of state, but her failures were singled out as more serious."

Trump Rolls in Washington Primary
2 hours ago

Donald Trump "was on course to win more than three-quarters of the vote in Washington's primary" last night. Ted Cruz's defunct candidacy still pulled about 10 percent. "Cruz dropped out of the race on May 3, but won 40 of the state's 41 delegates up for grabs at last weekend's state GOP convention."

Trump Rally Turns Violent in New Mexico
3 hours ago

"What started as a calm protest outside Donald Trump’s rally Tuesday erupted into fiery violence as protesters jumped on police cars, smashed windows and fought with Trump supporters and police. Police faced such an angry crowd that they called in reinforcements from around the state, seeking to double their numbers to counter the protesters, whose numbers swelled beyond 600." Protesters threw rocks and bottles at police, who broke up several fights.