Exxon and Shell want global government. Or the equivalent. At least when it comes to regulations that will force the oil giants to disclose payments to foreign governments for doing business in their countries.
Why? So that looming European disclosure mandates can be synced — the letter uses the term “equivalency” — with the U.S. requirements. The United Kingdom, the letter notes, is “moving quickly” to become the first European Union state to implement E.U. transparency rules.
If the U.S. commits to acting this year, there’s enough time to influence the U.K and hence the overall E.U approach, Exxon and Shell argue in the letter, noting the benefits of a “coordinated and harmonized global transparency regime.”
Conversely, “no one benefits” if multinational companies must file separate kinds of disclosure reports in separate places.
“An ideal solution to the issue might be that compliance with the reporting rules in one country would be deemed to satisfy the reporting requirements in another country notwithstanding variations in detail,” adds the May 1 letter to SEC commissioners, which surfaced on the SEC’s website a few days ago.
Exxon and Shell have interests at stake that go far beyond the esoteric details of disclosure paperwork. They’re part of a major, years-long oil-industry campaign to give the sector lots of leeway and keep specific companies’ SEC disclosure filings out of public view.
The industry warns that an overly prescriptive rule that also makes detailed payment information public will hobble Western oil companies competing worldwide against state-controlled Russian and Chinese firms that aren’t bound by the mandates.
Last summer, a federal judge threw out an earlier version of the SEC rule that oil and business groups had challenged.
The oil industry has long opposed the disclosure mandate, and now at least hopes to ensure that the SEC’s ongoing rewrite produces a less aggressive rule.
The U.S. rules will force SEC-listed oil, natural gas, and mining companies to disclose payments to governments in nations where they have projects, such as money for production licenses, taxes, royalties, and more.
The rule is aimed at chipping away at the “resource curse” of corruption, conflict, and poverty in energy-rich nations in Africa and elsewhere. Human-rights groups say the oil industry is seeking exemptions that would effectively gut the regulation, which is required under the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial law.
Exxon and Shell — both worldwide operators — are asking the SEC to publish draft rules ASAP, or at least before year’s end. A commitment to act this year could convince the U.K. to push back its implementation to April 2015, thereby providing “sufficient time” to collaborate before any E.U. states complete their rules, the letter states.
What We're Following See More »
"The Obama administration on Tuesday called on U.S. states to ban agreements prohibiting many workers from moving to their employers’ rivals, saying it would lead to a more competitive labor market and faster wage growth. The administration said so-called non-compete agreements interfere with worker mobility and states should consider barring companies from requiring low-wage workers and other employees who are not privy to trade secrets or other special circumstances to sign them."
House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz plans to spend "years, come January, probing the record of a President Hillary Clinton." Chaffetz told the Washington Post: “It’s a target-rich environment. Even before we get to Day One, we’ve got two years’ worth of material already lined up. She has four years of history at the State Department, and it ain’t good.”
Hillary Clinton's transition team has in place strict rules to limit the influence that lobbyists could have "in crafting the nominee’s policy agenda." The move makes it unlikely, at least for now, that Clinton would overturn Obama's executive order limiting the role that lobbyists play in government
Federal employees from 14 agencies have given nearly $2 million in campaign donations in the presidential race thus far, and 95 percent of the donations, totaling $1.9 million, have been to the Clinton campaign. Employees at the State Department, which Clinton lead for four years, has given 99 percent of its donations to the Democratic nominee.