Why Oil Companies Are Asking for More Regulation

The corporate logo of Shell, a Dutch petroleum company, is seen under a midafternoon sky in Kuala Lumpur on March 31, 2008. Malaysia's conservative Islamic party PAS on March 31 urged Muslims worldwide to launch a commercial boycott of Dutch products to protest against a film deemed insulting to Islam. 
National Journal
Ben Geman
Add to Briefcase
Ben Geman
May 5, 2014, 11:58 a.m.

Ex­xon and Shell want glob­al gov­ern­ment. Or the equi­val­ent. At least when it comes to reg­u­la­tions that will force the oil gi­ants to dis­close pay­ments to for­eign gov­ern­ments for do­ing busi­ness in their coun­tries.

In a new let­ter to the Se­cur­it­ies and Ex­change Com­mis­sion, Ex­xon and Shell urge the SEC to hurry up and is­sue the con­tro­ver­sial rules on in­dustry pay­ment dis­clos­ure.

Why? So that loom­ing European dis­clos­ure man­dates can be synced — the let­ter uses the term “equi­val­ency” — with the U.S. re­quire­ments. The United King­dom, the let­ter notes, is “mov­ing quickly” to be­come the first European Uni­on state to im­ple­ment E.U. trans­par­ency rules.

If the U.S. com­mits to act­ing this year, there’s enough time to in­flu­ence the U.K and hence the over­all E.U ap­proach, Ex­xon and Shell ar­gue in the let­ter, not­ing the be­ne­fits of a “co­ordin­ated and har­mon­ized glob­al trans­par­ency re­gime.”

Con­versely, “no one be­ne­fits” if mul­tina­tion­al com­pan­ies must file sep­ar­ate kinds of dis­clos­ure re­ports in sep­ar­ate places.

“An ideal solu­tion to the is­sue might be that com­pli­ance with the re­port­ing rules in one coun­try would be deemed to sat­is­fy the re­port­ing re­quire­ments in an­oth­er coun­try not­with­stand­ing vari­ations in de­tail,” adds the May 1 let­ter to SEC com­mis­sion­ers, which sur­faced on the SEC’s web­site a few days ago.

Ex­xon and Shell have in­terests at stake that go far bey­ond the eso­ter­ic de­tails of dis­clos­ure pa­per­work. They’re part of a ma­jor, years-long oil-in­dustry cam­paign to give the sec­tor lots of lee­way and keep spe­cif­ic com­pan­ies’ SEC dis­clos­ure fil­ings out of pub­lic view.

The in­dustry warns that an overly pre­script­ive rule that also makes de­tailed pay­ment in­form­a­tion pub­lic will hobble West­ern oil com­pan­ies com­pet­ing world­wide against state-con­trolled Rus­si­an and Chinese firms that aren’t bound by the man­dates.

Last sum­mer, a fed­er­al judge threw out an earli­er ver­sion of the SEC rule that oil and busi­ness groups had chal­lenged.

The oil in­dustry has long op­posed the dis­clos­ure man­date, and now at least hopes to en­sure that the SEC’s on­go­ing re­write pro­duces a less ag­gress­ive rule.

The U.S. rules will force SEC-lis­ted oil, nat­ur­al gas, and min­ing com­pan­ies to dis­close pay­ments to gov­ern­ments in na­tions where they have pro­jects, such as money for pro­duc­tion li­censes, taxes, roy­al­ties, and more.

The rule is aimed at chip­ping away at the “re­source curse” of cor­rup­tion, con­flict, and poverty in en­ergy-rich na­tions in Africa and else­where. Hu­man-rights groups say the oil in­dustry is seek­ing ex­emp­tions that would ef­fect­ively gut the reg­u­la­tion, which is re­quired un­der the 2010 Dodd-Frank fin­an­cial law.

Ex­xon and Shell — both world­wide op­er­at­ors — are ask­ing the SEC to pub­lish draft rules ASAP, or at least be­fore year’s end. A com­mit­ment to act this year could con­vince the U.K. to push back its im­ple­ment­a­tion to April 2015, thereby provid­ing “suf­fi­cient time” to col­lab­or­ate be­fore any E.U. states com­plete their rules, the let­ter states.

What We're Following See More »
Chef Jose Andres Campaigns With Clinton
3 hours ago
White House Weighs in Against Non-Compete Contracts
4 hours ago

"The Obama administration on Tuesday called on U.S. states to ban agreements prohibiting many workers from moving to their employers’ rivals, saying it would lead to a more competitive labor market and faster wage growth. The administration said so-called non-compete agreements interfere with worker mobility and states should consider barring companies from requiring low-wage workers and other employees who are not privy to trade secrets or other special circumstances to sign them."

House Investigators Already Sharpening Their Spears for Clinton
5 hours ago

House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz plans to spend "years, come January, probing the record of a President Hillary Clinton." Chaffetz told the Washington Post: “It’s a target-rich environment. Even before we get to Day One, we’ve got two years’ worth of material already lined up. She has four years of history at the State Department, and it ain’t good.”

No Lobbying Clinton’s Transition Team
8 hours ago

Hillary Clinton's transition team has in place strict rules to limit the influence that lobbyists could have "in crafting the nominee’s policy agenda." The move makes it unlikely, at least for now, that Clinton would overturn Obama's executive order limiting the role that lobbyists play in government

Federal Government Employees Giving Money to Clinton
8 hours ago

Federal employees from 14 agencies have given nearly $2 million in campaign donations in the presidential race thus far, and 95 percent of the donations, totaling $1.9 million, have been to the Clinton campaign. Employees at the State Department, which Clinton lead for four years, has given 99 percent of its donations to the Democratic nominee.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.