Lawmakers are already clashing over what is shaping up to be the next partisan brawl in the Senate: a Democratic proposal that would allow borrowers to refinance student-loan debt, paid for by a tax on millionaires.
As details emerge on the debate over college affordability, both sides are already throwing punches. Key Republican senators say the bill is simply political messaging, while Democrats are taking to the floor to describe the dire circumstances facing student borrowers.
The Bank on Students Emergency Loan Refinancing Act is part of the Democrats’ Fair Shot Agenda, an election-year platform aimed at exciting their base and demonstrating the party’s concern for pocketbook issues. The legislation has 26 cosponsors — all Democrats — and would let borrowers with outstanding student-loan debt refinance it at the 3.86 percent rate achieved after Congress passed the Bipartisan Student Loan Certainty Act last year.
The bill proposes to pay for the measure by applying the so-called Buffett Rule, a tax named after investor Warren Buffett that calls for a minimum rate of 30 percent on those earning more than $1 million. Democrats are pointing to the economic impact of student debt, with outstanding loans now totaling $1.2 trillion — even more than credit card debt, they say. Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota remembers how her grandfather paid her dad’s way through college by saving money in a coffee jar. There’s no jar big enough to pay today’s college bills, she said.
“This student debt hangs like an anchor around not just our students, but our entire economy,” Klobuchar said.
But the bill is a nonstarter for many Republicans, largely because of the provision to pay for it.
“This looks like a dusted-off proposal to raise taxes, and that’s not something I think we need to do,” said Sen. John Cornyn, the minority whip. “Our economy grew at 0.1 percent last quarter.”
Cornyn wouldn’t say unequivocally that Republicans would withhold support and keep the measure from getting the 60 votes needed for floor action, because he is still reviewing the legislation. But Republicans generally balk at the notion of raising taxes. He also said Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, the ranking Republican on the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, would mount the GOP’s response.
“This is kind of like a Trojan Horse, the best it looks to me,” Cornyn said. “I think you’re going to hear very positive and constructive proposals from our side. I think Senator Alexander, among others, is going to be leading that effort. We’re happy to engage on education and on costs and affordability, but I don’t think this is the right approach.”
Previewing his conference’s expected rebuttal, Alexander pointed to GOP proposals, including school-choice measures and a revamping of the Pell Grant system, as alternatives. “The Democrats’ proposal is starting down the road of turning a trillion dollars of student loans into grants and counting spending in a way that the Congressional Budget Office has told Congress not to do,” he said in a statement to National Journal, referring to a debate over congressional accounting.
Indeed, Democrats admit that they crafted this year’s legislative agenda with midterm elections in mind. Republican criticism of the bill has been swift, coming even before the chamber begins debating the measure.
“It’s got a pay-for that’s unacceptable,” said Sen. Richard Burr of North Carolina, who helped broker the student-loan bill last summer.
Sen. Orrin Hatch, the ranking Republican on the Finance Committee, where the bill was referred, also shot the legislation down.
“Instead of lining up political show votes, Democrats should be working with Republicans to advance legislation that will create more jobs for young people and grow the economy,” he said in a statement.
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."