SPOTLIGHT

The Rise of the DIY Super PAC

Lights, camera, super PAC action: Jordan
National Journal
Shane Goldmacher
See more stories about...
Shane Goldmacher
May 8, 2014, 7:40 a.m.

Tom Stey­er isn’t giv­ing away his mil­lions to some stranger. He’s build­ing his own polit­ic­al ap­par­at­us (both a su­per PAC and a non­profit, of course) from scratch. Mi­chael Bloomberg is ex­ecut­ing the same do-it-your­self strategy. So are a grow­ing num­ber of big donors who are re­ject­ing the es­tab­lished old guard. Some of these mega-donors have grown dis­il­lu­sioned; some have nar­row agen­das; oth­ers just think they know bet­ter.

— One of these solo su­per PAC prac­ti­tion­ers is John Jordan, the wine ex­ec­ut­ive who fun­ded the $1.4 mil­lion su­per PAC that failed to de­feat Sen. Ed Mar­key (D) in last year’s Mas­sachu­setts spe­cial elec­tion. Count Jordan, the sub­ject a magazine pro­file in this week’s Na­tion­al Journ­al, among the dis­il­lu­sioned. He’d been a “sev­en-fig­ure” Cross­roads con­trib­ut­or but said, “With Cross­roads, all you got was Karl Rove would come and do his little rain dance.”

— Jordan’s latest ven­ture: Help­ing fund $250,000 (and count­ing) in worth of ads for pe­di­at­ric neurosur­geon Mon­ica We­hby (R), a can­did­ate many Re­pub­lic­ans be­lieve could give Sen. Jeff Merkley (D) a real race in Ore­gon.

— And for those think­ing that the Mc­Cutcheon Su­preme Court de­cision might shift sub­stan­tial power back to the polit­ic­al parties, think again. “It is a tem­pest in a teapot in terms of prac­tic­al polit­ics,” Jordan says. That’s be­cause the big, un­lim­ited money re­mains out­side money.

What’s most in­ter­est­ing about Jordan and donors like him is that be­cause of the rise in DIY activ­ity, money is in­creas­ingly not just bey­ond the party’s grasp, but the broad­er es­tab­lish­ment’s as well, as more and more donors go it alone.
— Shane Gold­mach­er

What We're Following See More »
SUFFOLK POLL
New Survey Shows Clinton Up 9 in Pennsylvania
4 hours ago
THE LATEST

If a new poll is to be believed, Hillary Clinton has a big lead in the all-important swing state of Pennsylvania. A new Suffolk University survey shows her ahead of Donald Trump, 50%-41%. In a four-way race, she maintains her nine-point lead, 46%-37%. "Pennsylvania has voted Democratic in the past six presidential elections, going back to Bill Clinton’s first win in 1992. Yet it is a rust belt state that could be in play, as indicated by recent general-election polling showing a close race."

Source:
$500 MILLION PROJECT
Obama Library Heading to Jackson Park in Chicago
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"President Barack Obama has chosen Jackson Park, a lakefront park that once hosted the world’s fair on the city’s South Side, for his $500 million presidential library, according to a person familiar with the matter."

Source:
THREE NIGHTS RUNNING
Democrats Beat Republicans in Convention Ratings So Far
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Wednesday was the third night in a row that the Democratic convention enjoyed a ratings win over the Republican convention last week. Which might have prompted a fundraising email from Donald Trump exhorting supporters not to watch. "Unless you want to be lied to, belittled, and attacked for your beliefs, don't watch Hillary's DNC speech tonight," the email read. "Instead, help Donald Trump hold her accountable, call out her lies and fight back against her nasty attacks."

Source:
THE QUESTION
How Many VIPs Were the Secret Service Protecting in Philly Last Night?
6 hours ago
THE ANSWER

Seven, according to an official Secret Service tweet.

Source:
‘MOGUL,’ ‘DAREDEVIL’
Candidates’ Code Names Revealed
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The Clintons will retain their Secret Service "code names from the last time they lived in the White House. Hillary Clinton is EVERGREEN and Bill ClintonEAGLE. Donald Trump is MOGUL, according to reports, and Melania Trump MUSE. The vice presidents get code names, too: Mike Pence is HOOSIER—a little on the nose—and his wife HUMMINGBIRD. Tim Kaine is DAREDEVIL, somewhat ambitiously. His wife's? To be determined."

Source:
×