Expert Tells Congress He ‘Presumes’ Russia Has Biological Arms Program

Global Security Newswire Staff
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Global Security Newswire Staff
May 9, 2014, 9:24 a.m.

A U.S. re­search­er on Wed­nes­day told a House pan­el that he “pre­sumes” Rus­sia has an act­ive bio­lo­gic­al weapons pro­gram, Time magazine re­por­ted.

Milton Leiten­berg, a Uni­versity of Mary­land seni­or schol­ar fo­cus­ing on bio­lo­gic­al arms, told the House For­eign Af­fairs Sub­com­mit­tee on Europe that Rus­sia does not per­mit out­side in­spec­tions of three of its sci­entif­ic fa­cil­it­ies. As a res­ult, he said it is not pos­sible to know the cur­rent status of the coun­try’s bio­lo­gic­al weapons pro­gram.

“We don’t know what they’re do­ing,” the arms con­trol spe­cial­ist said. “They may or may not have an act­ive of­fens­ive pro­gram — I pre­sume they do.”

Leiten­berg noted that the U.S. gov­ern­ment does not as­sess Rus­sia to be “pro­du­cing and stock­pil­ing [bio­lo­gic­al] agent any more.”

With the fall of the So­viet Uni­on, Rus­sia as­sumed con­trol of much of its bio­lo­gic­al weapons-re­lated in­fra­struc­ture. Mo­scow says it does not re­tain a bio­lo­gic­al ar­sen­al and is not con­duct­ing any re­search in­to of­fens­ive uses for patho­gens. However, a 2012 es­say by Pres­id­ent Vladi­mir Putin raised con­cerns that he fore­sees the de­vel­op­ment of a new class of bio­lo­gic­al arms made to be ex­tra po­tent through ge­net­ic modi­fic­a­tion.

Rus­sia’s re­cent in­cur­sion in­to Ukraine has caused ten­sions with the West to spike to their highest point since the end of the Cold War. With the up­tick in ten­sions, old wor­ries have re­turned about Rus­sia’s weapons of mass de­struc­tion cap­ab­il­it­ies.

Mo­scow is a mem­ber of the Bio­lo­gic­al Weapons Con­ven­tion. However the BWC ac­cord does not have a mech­an­ism for en­sur­ing that sig­nat­or­ies are in com­pli­ance with the treaty’s pro­hib­i­tion against the cre­ation, pro­duc­tion and pos­ses­sion of leth­al patho­gens — such as small­pox and an­thrax strains — that have been mod­i­fied so they can be dis­sem­in­ated on a large scale.

Amy Smith­son, a seni­or fel­low with the James Mar­tin Cen­ter for Non­pro­lif­er­a­tion Stud­ies, said it is feas­ible to find out about a na­tion’s po­ten­tial bio­lo­gic­al weapon activ­it­ies even without an en­force­ment mech­an­ism in the treaty. She poin­ted to the ef­forts of U.N. weapon in­spect­ors in Ir­aq after the first Gulf War, which res­ul­ted in Bagh­dad be­ing forced to ac­know­ledge its work on chem­ic­al and bio­lo­gic­al arms.

What We're Following See More »
NRA Chief: Leftist Protesters Are Paid
2 days ago
Trump Still on Campaign Rhetoric
2 days ago
Trump Rails On Obamacare
2 days ago

After spending a few minutes re-litigating the Democratic primary, Donald Trump turned his focus to Obamacare. “I inherited a mess, believe me. We also inherited a failed healthcare law that threatens our medical system with absolute and total catastrophe” he said. “I’ve been watching and nobody says it, but Obamacare doesn’t work.” He finished, "so we're going to repeal and replace Obamacare."

Trump Goes After The Media
2 days ago

Donald Trump lobbed his first attack at the “dishonest media” about a minute into his speech, saying that the media would not appropriately cover the standing ovation that he received. “We are fighting the fake news,” he said, before doubling down on his previous claim that the press is “the enemy of the people." However, he made a distinction, saying that he doesn't think all media is the enemy, just the "fake news."

Report: Trump Asked FBI to Deny Russia Stories
2 days ago

"The FBI rejected a recent White House request to publicly knock down media reports about communications between Donald Trump's associates and Russians known to US intelligence during the 2016 presidential campaign, multiple US officials briefed on the matter tell CNN. But a White House official said late Thursday that the request was only made after the FBI indicated to the White House it did not believe the reporting to be accurate."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.