The States Where Obamacare Could Still Go Badly

Several states are in danger of seeing big premium increases.

National Journal
Sam Baker
Add to Briefcase
Sam Baker
May 12, 2014, 1 a.m.

Des­pite Obama­care’s strong na­tion­al en­roll­ment num­bers, sev­er­al states are at risk for big premi­um hikes.

Each state is its own in­sur­ance mar­ket, and they had wildly dif­fer­ent ex­per­i­ences dur­ing Obama­care’s first open-en­roll­ment win­dow. So al­though na­tion­wide stat­ist­ics are im­port­ant for judging the law’s polit­ic­al suc­cess, the sub­stant­ive tests for the law’s fu­ture mostly lie with the states — and some of them aren’t look­ing so hot.

Pre­dict­ing premi­um in­creases is an in­ex­act sci­ence to say the least, but health care ex­perts see a troub­ling num­ber of red flags in cer­tain states. Per­haps the most vul­ner­able is West Vir­gin­ia — the home state of Sylvia Math­ews Bur­well, who’s await­ing con­firm­a­tion as the next Health and Hu­man Ser­vices sec­ret­ary.

“West Vir­gin­ia sticks out as really wor­ri­some,” said Car­oline Pear­son, vice pres­id­ent at the con­sult­ing firm Avalere Health. “Their ex­change is not hav­ing great luck.”

Premi­ums will go up, on av­er­age, across the board — premi­ums go up every year. But a range of factors could drive high­er-than-av­er­age in­creases in cer­tain places. States that fell short of their over­all en­roll­ment goals, and where the people who did en­roll are mostly older and sick­er, are more at risk for large premi­um hikes. So are states that don’t have much com­pet­i­tion among in­surers.

“If you lose on all of those, then you’re really look­ing bad,” Pear­son said.

And West Vir­gin­ia lost on all three fronts this year. It only got about 60 per­cent of the way to its total en­roll­ment tar­get, Pear­son said. And it has the worst mix of young adults in the coun­try — just 19 per­cent of people who picked a plan through the state’s ex­change were young adults, who are pre­sumed to be health­i­er and thus help keep premi­ums in check.

Com­plet­ing the tri­fecta, there’s only one in­sur­ance car­ri­er — Blue Cross Blue Shield — in West Vir­gin­ia’s ex­change.

Hawaii is an­oth­er con­sensus pick, and some ex­perts say the state might nev­er be able to sup­port its Obama­care ex­change. Hawaii was near the bot­tom for total en­roll­ment, sign­ing up just 15 per­cent of its eli­gible pop­u­la­tion, and had the second-worst mix of young adults. The state’s ex­change also suf­fers from the fact that Hawaii had a low un­in­sur­ance rate to be­gin with — mean­ing there’s a smal­ler pool of po­ten­tial cus­tom­ers there, which makes the state less at­tract­ive to in­surers.

“Hawaii looks prob­lem­at­ic. They could have vi­ab­il­ity prob­lems,” said Larry Levitt, seni­or vice pres­id­ent for spe­cial ini­ti­at­ives at the Kais­er Fam­ily Found­a­tion.

Levitt ad­ded an­oth­er factor that could drive up some states’ premi­ums: wheth­er they went along with Pres­id­ent Obama’s de­cision to let in­surers un-can­cel cer­tain plans that don’t com­ply with the Af­ford­able Care Act.

The con­sumers who are most likely to keep their once-can­celed plans are people who got a good deal un­der the pre-Obama­care sys­tem — gen­er­ally young­er, health­i­er people who en­joyed low premi­ums and who make too much money to qual­i­fy for the health care law’s sub­sidies. Let­ting them re­new their non­com­pli­ant plans keeps a healthy pop­u­la­tion out of the ex­changes.

“That’s the one I hear most of­ten from in­surers, and I think that’s right. It cer­tainly is a factor,” Levitt said.

Ohio and Ari­zona, both of which al­lowed plan ex­ten­sions, are on Levitt’s list of states to watch for big premi­um hikes. He and Pear­son men­tioned Iowa, which al­lowed a two-year ex­ten­sion for can­celed plans and was the second-worst state at en­rolling its eli­gible pop­u­la­tion.

Health care ana­lysts are also keep­ing an eye on premi­ums in Mary­land, Mis­sis­sippi, New Mex­ico, and South Dakota, where of­fi­cials had to beg and plead just to get one car­ri­er in­to the state’s private mar­ket.

It’s im­possible, though, to say with any cer­tainty wheth­er a par­tic­u­lar state will see an above-av­er­age price in­crease next year.

Premi­ums re­flect med­ic­al spend­ing, not just the demo­graph­ics of state mar­kets, and quick­en­ing growth in health costs — which many ana­lysts are ex­pect­ing — could lead to double-di­git premi­um hikes ir­re­spect­ive of Obama­care en­roll­ment.

Some states’ risk factors could also change. After see­ing the res­ults of a stronger-than-ex­pec­ted first year, in­surers that ini­tially sat out the ex­changes are think­ing about ex­pand­ing their pres­ence. Ana­lysts ex­pect United­Health­care — a massive in­surer with hardly any ex­change pres­ence in 2014 — to enter sev­er­al new state mar­kets next year.

More com­pet­i­tion could be­ne­fit sev­er­al states that are at risk for big premi­um hikes primar­ily be­cause they only have one or two in­surers now. There are ru­mors of car­ri­ers en­ter­ing the mar­ket­places in Mis­sis­sippi, Iowa, and South Dakota, in par­tic­u­lar.

“Those are ma­jor play­ers with big mar­ket­ing dol­lars, and if they de­cide to price low, that could jumble the mar­ket quite a bit,” Levitt said.

And no one ex­cept in­sur­ance com­pan­ies knows ex­actly what in­surers pre­dicted for this year. Wheth­er a par­tic­u­lar car­ri­er needs to raise its rates de­pends on how well en­roll­ment matched that com­pany’s own ex­pect­a­tions — not on wheth­er it lived up to stand­ards set by the White House or the me­dia.

So a com­pany that set ag­gress­ively low premi­ums for 2014 might need to raise its premi­ums a lot if it ended up saddled with more claims than ex­pec­ted.

By con­trast, a car­ri­er that set ag­gress­ively low rates as a tool to cap­ture more cus­tom­ers, and suc­ceeded, might not need to pur­sue big hikes next year — es­pe­cially if it’s in a com­pet­it­ive mar­ket.

“If you’ve got a lot of car­ri­ers, you can af­ford to lose a few,” Pear­son said.

We also don’t know how many people in each state signed up dir­ectly with an in­sur­ance com­pany, rather than go­ing through their states’ ex­changes.

Dir­ect en­roll­ments — which num­ber around 5 mil­lion na­tion­wide — are part of the same risk pool as ex­change cus­tom­ers, but aren’t in­cluded in fed­er­al-en­roll­ment data. If off-ex­change en­rollees are health­i­er than ex­change cus­tom­ers in a par­tic­u­lar state, that state’s over­all risk pool would be bet­ter than of­fi­cial data make it look.

What We're Following See More »
EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 1
DEA Head Rosenberg Resigning
25 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

"Chuck Rosenberg, the acting head of the Drug Enforcement Agency who has found himself and his agency at odds with the Trump administration in recent months, told staff members Tuesday that he is planning to step down from his post." The Obama administration holdover will step down on October 1.

Source:
HAD BEGUN TO PUBLICLY CRITICIZE TRUMP
Sen. Corker to Retire
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Another Republican member of Congress is showing himself out the door. After much thought, consideration and family discussion over the past year, Elizabeth and I have decided that I will leave the United States Senate when my term expires at the end of 2018,” said Sen. Bob Corker in a statement. The Tennessean has served since 2006.

Source:
NOT ILLEGAL, BUT MUST BE FORWARDED TO WORK ACCOUNTS
At Least 6 WH Advisors Used Private Email Accounts
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

Jared Kushner, Stephen Bannon, Reince Priebus, Gary Cohn, Stephen Miller, and Ivanka Trump sent or received some emails on personal accounts that related to White House business. "Officials are supposed to use government emails for their official duties so their conversations are available to the public and those conducting oversight. But it is not illegal for White House officials to use private email accounts as long as they forward work-related messages to their work accounts so they can be preserved."

Source:
SAYS CONTACTS WERE “BENIGN”
Stone Releases Correspondence with Guccifer 2.0
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Roger Stone, a longtime friend and adviser to Donald Trump, released correspondence Tuesday" with the online hacker known as Guccifer 2.0 , which "U.S. intelligence agencies said was used by Russian government-linked entities to distribute embarrassing information about Democrats during the 2016 election. The disclosures came in a 47-page opening statement made available to reporters in advance of Mr. Stone’s Tuesday appearance in front of the House Intelligence Committee." Stone called his contacts with Guccifer "limited" and "benign."

Source:
PRIEBUS, SPICER, HICKS, MCGAHAN
Mueller Could Start Interviewing White House Figures This Week
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Special counsel investigators could start interviewing current and former White House staff as soon as later this week regarding the Russian probe, two sources familiar with the matter tell CNN. One source cautioned it is still being worked out with Robert Mueller's office and said it might be delayed until next week." Among those who could have a sit-down with the special prosecutor: former chief of staff Reince Priebus, former press secretary Sean Spicer, communications director Hope Hicks, White House counsel Don McGahn, communications adviser Josh Raffel and associate counsel James Burnham.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login