Midterm elections are the red-headed stepchild of American politics — no one cares about them.
A new poll from Gallup confirms that theory, at least for this year. Fully 53 percent of U.S. voters told Gallup they are less excited about voting in this year’s midterms than in previous elections, while 35 percent said they are more enthusiastic. In 2010, those numbers were basically reversed.
It’s clear that voters are not as fired up about congressional races as there were four years ago. But should they be? Aside from a handful of interesting Senate races — in Louisiana, North Carolina, Arkansas, Alaska, and Michigan — the midterms aren’t offering as exciting a toss-up as expected. Nate Silver predicts that Republicans are “slight favorites” to win control of the Senate. And unlike in 2010, the 2014 midterms don’t offer Republicans an opportunity to usurp the Democratically controlled House. Now, it’s a given.
In 2010, voters were unusually enthusiastic about the midterms. But that was in the midst of the tea-party uprising, when Republicans were fired up about electing people who would overturn the Affordable Care Act.
Four years later, not much has changed in that respect. GOP candidates are still campaigning on their animosity toward Obamacare. Even Democratic Sen. Kay Hagan — who voted for Obamacare — is now using the health care law as a whipping boy against her Republican opponent in North Carolina.
Campaign tactics may not have changed much since 2010, but voter engagement has. This time around, they just seem tired.
What We're Following See More »
"The Obama administration on Tuesday called on U.S. states to ban agreements prohibiting many workers from moving to their employers’ rivals, saying it would lead to a more competitive labor market and faster wage growth. The administration said so-called non-compete agreements interfere with worker mobility and states should consider barring companies from requiring low-wage workers and other employees who are not privy to trade secrets or other special circumstances to sign them."
House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz plans to spend "years, come January, probing the record of a President Hillary Clinton." Chaffetz told the Washington Post: “It’s a target-rich environment. Even before we get to Day One, we’ve got two years’ worth of material already lined up. She has four years of history at the State Department, and it ain’t good.”
Hillary Clinton's transition team has in place strict rules to limit the influence that lobbyists could have "in crafting the nominee’s policy agenda." The move makes it unlikely, at least for now, that Clinton would overturn Obama's executive order limiting the role that lobbyists play in government
Federal employees from 14 agencies have given nearly $2 million in campaign donations in the presidential race thus far, and 95 percent of the donations, totaling $1.9 million, have been to the Clinton campaign. Employees at the State Department, which Clinton lead for four years, has given 99 percent of its donations to the Democratic nominee.