Is 8th Grade Too Early to Pick a Career?

Inside South Carolina’s experiment to bring career counseling into the classroom from kindergarten through senior year.

National Journal
Nancy Cook
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Nancy Cook
May 14, 2014, 1 a.m.

If you want middle and high school stu­dents to give great­er thought to their ca­reer paths, one key step is to hire and train good guid­ance coun­selors.

So goes one of the primary les­sons from South Car­o­lina’s nearly nine-year ex­per­i­ment to bring ca­reer coun­sel­ing in­to its pub­lic school classrooms as a way to bet­ter con­nect gradu­at­ing stu­dents to the ever-chan­ging de­mands of the labor mar­ket. “We want stu­dents to be­come more aware of their ca­reer choices and un­der­stand the ideas in terms of salar­ies and the job mar­ket out­look,” says Dr. Sab­rina Moore of the South Car­o­lina Edu­ca­tion De­part­ment.

Help­ing stu­dents sort through ca­reer paths is now the primary role for Pa­tri­cia Re­id, who has spent 21 years as a teach­er, an at-risk guid­ance coun­selor, and now a school ca­reer spe­cial­ist. Re­id works at a middle school in Clover, S.C., where she ad­vises roughly 300 eighth-graders each year on their ca­reer goals through the state’s Per­son­al Path­ways to Suc­cess pro­gram.

Re­id be­gins by meet­ing and talk­ing with each stu­dent about her in­terests, hob­bies, and aca­dem­ic pref­er­ences. To­geth­er, the two identi­fy a ca­reer path that the stu­dent can fo­cus on dur­ing high school — per­haps tech­no­logy, en­gin­eer­ing, veter­in­ary sci­ence, or man­u­fac­tur­ing. Then Re­id meets with the stu­dent and par­ents to de­vel­op an in­di­vidu­al gradu­ation plan, which al­lows stu­dents to take elect­ives throughout high school to bol­ster par­tic­u­lar in­terests. So, if a stu­dent ex­presses in­terest in be­com­ing, say, a veter­in­ari­an, he could sign up for an ag­ri­cul­tur­al sci­ence or an­im­al-care classes in high school in ad­di­tion to en­rolling in re­quired courses such as Eng­lish, math, sci­ence, and his­tory.

The goal is to ex­pose stu­dents to their chosen pro­fes­sion­al field as early as pos­sible, as well as to give them time for in­tern­ships or job-shad­ow­ing. Stu­dents al­ways can — and do — change their minds and shift fo­cus if they like. “It’s nev­er too soon to think about ca­reers be­cause of the com­pet­it­ive­ness in the work­place now,” Re­id says. “The world of work is totally evolving. A big part of what the pro­gram does is to give you a vari­ety of op­por­tun­it­ies to dis­cov­er and ex­plore.”

Ask­ing pub­lic school stu­dents to think through their ca­reer op­tions more closely is not just a whim in today’s tough eco­nomy. Edu­cat­ors and poli­cy­makers, such as those in South Car­o­lina, view it as an im­per­at­ive to in­sure the coun­try’s fu­ture com­pet­it­ive­ness. The na­tion­al un­em­ploy­ment rate fell in April from 6.7 per­cent to 6.3 per­cent in the most re­cent re­lease of labor data, but the un­em­ploy­ment rate among teen­agers re­mains in the double di­gits at 19.1 per­cent. And, if teens and twentyso­methings fail to gain a toe­hold in the labor mar­ket dur­ing high school and bey­ond, it can set them back in terms of their fin­ances and their ca­reer pro­gres­sion for years — enough for some eco­nom­ists to con­sider this par­tic­u­lar mo­ment a crisis for teen un­em­ploy­ment. 

South Car­o­lina first hit on the idea of de­vel­op­ing a ro­bust ca­reer-coun­sel­ing pro­gram for its pub­lic school sys­tem in the late 1990s. By then, the state’s long­time tex­tile in­dustry had moved thou­sands of its blue-col­lar fact­ory jobs over­seas. In its place, South Car­o­lina hoped to at­tract com­pan­ies that could em­ploy work­ers in ad­vanced man­u­fac­tur­ing and sup­ply fields. (BMW, as one ex­ample, opened up a plant in Greer in 1994). “What was hap­pen­ing was that we could not find em­ploy­ees for the jobs that were be­ing cre­ated,” says Robert Barnett, as­so­ci­ate vice pres­id­ent for work­force, edu­ca­tion, and man­u­fac­tur­ing policy with the South Car­o­lina Cham­ber of Com­merce. “The kids who had come out of school were not match­ing up with the jobs either. I’m not say­ing we were in a crisis mode, but we were get­ting close to it.”

To tackle this mis­match, loc­al busi­ness lead­ers, edu­ca­tion ad­voc­ates, and a few vo­cal school su­per­in­tend­ents set to work in 1999 on le­gis­la­tion to im­prove the state’s work­force de­vel­op­ment and to more closely tie its edu­ca­tion­al sys­tem to the job mar­ket. By 2005, South Car­o­lina passed the Edu­ca­tion and Eco­nom­ic De­vel­op­ment Act, which re­quired every pub­lic school, grades K-12, to in­ject more ca­reer coun­sel­ing in­to the cur­riculum. In ele­ment­ary and middle school, this primar­ily takes the form of ba­sic ca­reer ex­plor­a­tion. By eighth grade, stu­dents meet one-on-one with coun­selors, like Re­id, to de­vel­op an in­di­vidu­al gradu­ation plan for high school. Stu­dents spe­cial­ize in a ca­reer cluster and take a hand­ful of elect­ives by the end of their seni­or years that re­late to their ca­reer plan.

The pro­gram now serves about 250,000 pub­lic school stu­dents at an av­er­age cost to the state of $28 mil­lion a year, Moore says. The ma­jor­ity of that budget (about $21 mil­lion) goes to train and hire the ca­reer spe­cial­ists and guid­ance coun­selors. A five-year study of South Car­o­lina’s pro­gram called the coun­selors one of the most in­teg­ral parts to its suc­cess. “School coun­sel­ing used to be fo­cused on col­lege, col­lege, col­lege,” says Nat­alie Stipan­ovic, an as­sist­ant pro­fess­or at the Uni­versity of Louis­ville, who has ex­tens­ively stud­ied the coun­sel­ing por­tion of the South Car­o­lina pro­gram. “With all of the kids who don’t go to col­lege, what do we do? This pro­gram makes sure that every stu­dent is seen as im­port­ant to talk to.”

Stu­dents dur­ing the 2010-11 school year seem to agree they had be­nefited from the ex­tra at­ten­tion. A ma­jor­ity of sopho­mores and seni­ors sur­veyed from that year told re­search­ers on the lon­git­ud­in­al study that they’d already re­searched jobs, en­rolled in classes rel­ev­ant to their ca­reer plans, and par­ti­cip­ated in ex­tra­cur­ricular activ­it­ies or work out­side of school that some­how con­nec­ted to po­ten­tial jobs.

For edu­ca­tion­al ex­perts, the South Car­o­lina pro­gram of­fers a po­ten­tial mod­el for oth­er states and cit­ies as they con­tem­plate ways to make high school gradu­ates more com­pet­it­ive and to en­sure they can ob­tain a middle-class life­style. Right now, ca­reer dis­cus­sions tend to fo­cus on col­lege or bust, says An­thony P. Carne­vale, dir­ect­or and re­search pro­fess­or of the Geor­getown Uni­versity Cen­ter on Edu­ca­tion and the Work­force. It’s as if no middle ground ex­ists between a stu­dent at­tend­ing Har­vard or work­ing at Mc­Don­ald’s. “If you want up­ward mo­bil­ity in Amer­ica for low-in­come kids, you have to get them to think about how they will use their edu­ca­tion to make a liv­ing,” Carne­vale says. “Right now, we act like there’s only one path­way.”

The biggest chal­lenge fa­cing the South Car­o­lina pro­gram pre­dict­ably comes in the form of money and re­sources. The state slashed its edu­ca­tion fund­ing at the height of the re­ces­sion, a move that showed the fin­an­cial vul­ner­ab­il­ity of these types of pro­grams. The ra­tio of stu­dents to guid­ance and ca­reer coun­selors re­mains an­oth­er is­sue; Re­id says she still sees any­where from 300 to 475 stu­dents a year. Ideally, the pro­gram wants to en­cour­age a ra­tio of one coun­selor to 350 stu­dents — still a high num­ber for all of its em­phas­is on in­di­vidu­al at­ten­tion.

And what about the naysay­ers who ar­gue that eighth graders are not yet in a po­s­i­tion to pick a spe­cif­ic ca­reer path? “You’d be sur­prised how well-versed stu­dents are,” says Barnett of the South Car­o­lina Cham­ber of Com­merce. “It’s not a lifelong com­mit­ment to a cer­tain ca­reer they’re mak­ing — just a de­cision to look at spe­cif­ic paths.”

What We're Following See More »
WITH LIVE BLOGGING
Trump Deposition Video Is Online
1 days ago
STAFF PICKS

The video of Donald Trump's deposition in his case against restaurateur Jeffrey Zakarian is now live. Slate's Jim Newell and Josh Voorhees are live-blogging it while they watch.

Source:
SOUND LEVEL AFFECTED
Debate Commission Admits Issues with Trump’s Mic
1 days ago
THE LATEST

The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.

Source:
TRUMP VS. CHEFS
Trump Deposition Video to Be Released
1 days ago
THE LATEST

"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."

Source:
A CANDIDATE TO BE ‘PROUD’ OF
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
1 days ago
THE LATEST

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
×