Analysts warn that China’s development of new cruise missiles raises the risk of its technology spreading to other countries.
“If China’s past record of proliferating ballistic missiles and technology is any indication of its intentions vis-Ã -vis cruise missile transfers, the consequences could be highly disruptive for the nonproliferation regime,” academics Andrew Ericson, Dennis Gormley and Jingdong Yuan wrote in a Monday analysis for the National Interest.
The experts said China’s pursuit of new antiship and land-attack cruise missiles is intended largely to prepare against possible tensions over Taiwan, a self-governing island claimed by Beijing as Chinese territory. They added, though, that outside actors have previously obtained Chinese arms, which may one day include an advanced nuclear-ready cruise missile for hitting land-based targets.
Past Chinese actions have held up Beijing’s decade-old effort to join the Missile Technology Control Regime, according to Ericson and Yuan, who work as associate professors at the U.S. Naval War College in Rhode Island and at Sydney University, respectively.
They said members of the 34-country export control group are skeptical of China’s past assurances that it would informally observe rules established by the organization, which is dedicated to limiting the spread of sophisticated missile technologies. Beijing previously supplied antiship cruise missiles to Bangladesh, Indonesia, Iran, Myanmar and Pakistan, they wrote, citing findings from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. In addition, Pakistan may have obtained land-targeting cruise missiles from China, according to the analysts.
The analysts said bringing China into the multinational group would represent a significant achievement, but Beijing must first take substantial steps to “correct previous shortcomings.”
Joining the missile nonproliferation framework may ultimately necessitate a “Herculean effort” by China to ramp up its enforcement of missile-trade regulations among domestic exporters, they wrote.
Clarification: This story has been updated to identify all three authors of the National Interest analysis.
What We're Following See More »
"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”
The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.
President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."
Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.