With President Obama set to visit New York’s Tappan Zee Bridge on Wednesday to draw attention to the nation’s pressing infrastructure needs, a Senate panel is planning to finalize legislation Thursday to authorize more spending for transportation projects.
But where the funding will come from remains a six-year, $100 billion question still to be addressed.
Federal payments to states for as many as 6,000 road and transit projects could grind to a halt this summer to keep the Highway Trust Fund’s balance above zero, as required by law. There are estimates that as many as 700,000 jobs would be lost over a year.
“The moment is dire,” Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx said Tuesday at a Bloomberg Government event in Washington, as recounted by Bloomberg Businessweek. The trust fund, Foxx said, “is quickly running toward insolvency.”
While Congress in this midterm election year so far has done little to address the shortfall and inability of the highway fund to keep pace with costs, in recent days there has finally been some legislative movement.
The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee on Monday night unveiled what it called bipartisan legislation to authorize another six years of highway projects. The bill is to be marked up Thursday by Sen. Barbara Boxer’s panel; it calls for funding improvements to the nation’s federal-aid highway programs at current levels plus inflation.
The measure would maintain current formulas and would increase annually the amounts each state receives for the fiscal year. In all, spending on highway programs would come to $38.44 billion in 2015 and rise to $42.59 billion by 2020.
Amendments from some members are anticipated during the markup — including perhaps some dealing with specific ideas on how to pay for the fund. A blog appearing Tuesday on the conservative site Heritage.org criticized the Senate bill as reducing flexibility for the states in how they spend gas-tax dollars, and said the bill continues Congress’s “habit of increasing spending when the money is not there, which is one reason why the Highway Trust Fund is nearly depleted.”
But legislative aides note it is formally up to another panel — the Senate Finance Committee — to devise those funding mechanisms. And the rub is that there is still no consensus on how to do that.
In the House, the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee hasn’t yet produced a companion bill, and Chairman Bill Shuster does not expect it will do so until later this spring or summer. But Republicans led by Shuster and House Majority Leader Eric Cantor already have ruled out any move to raise tolls or taxes on gasoline and diesel fuel, which no longer provide enough funding.
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden also has questioned the idea of new tolls on existing roads, or such things as charging motorists based on the miles they drive. He also says temporary fixes or emergency patches are not the answer, either, and that it will take up to $100 billion just to keep the trust fund solvent for the next six years.
Even a short-term fix will require $10 billion to keep the fund solvent through the calendar year, says Wyden, and getting through fiscal 2015 will take another $8 billion. One idea that he has floated is a resurrection of the Build America Bonds program that was part of the stimulus strategy in 2009. By the time the program ended after two years, he said, it had helped finance more than $180 billion worth of projects from one end of America to the other.
In his remarks Tuesday at the Bloomberg event, Foxx noted that the administration has proposed a four-year, $302 billion package that would raise some of that money by closing some corporate tax breaks. Congressional reaction has been lukewarm.
“This is a big problem for the country and we’ve got to deal with it,” Foxx said.
Meanwhile, when Obama appears and speaks Wednesday at the Tappan Zee Bridge, he will hammer home that the federal funding for road and infrastructure could soon be depleted — right in the middle of the summer construction season.
What We're Following See More »
"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”
The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.
President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."
Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.