Republicans Might Let Tax-Extenders Bill Move Forward

U.S. Sen. John Thune (R-SD) speaks on Capitol Hill October 12, 2011 in Washington, DC. Senate Republicans spoke to reporters briefly after attending their weekly Senate Republican Policy Committee closed luncheon meeting. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
National Journal
Michael Catalin
Add to Briefcase
Michael Catalin
May 14, 2014, 3:29 p.m.

Usu­ally when Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id pre­vents Re­pub­lic­ans from of­fer­ing amend­ments, GOP sen­at­ors block the un­der­ly­ing bill. At least, that was how Re­pub­lic­ans handled the re­cently dis­patched en­ergy-ef­fi­ciency bill, which went down earli­er this week.

But there are signs that even if Re­id blocks amend­ments on le­gis­la­tion to ex­tend ex­pired tax pro­vi­sions, known as tax ex­tenders, Re­pub­lic­ans won’t pre­vent the bill from com­ing to the floor.

“There’s prob­ably a lot more sup­port among Re­pub­lic­ans for tax ex­tenders than there per­haps was for en­ergy ef­fi­ciency,” said Sen. John Thune of South Dakota, the cham­ber’s No. 3 Re­pub­lic­an.

The dif­fer­ence, ac­cord­ing to law­makers, is that some of the roughly 60 pro­vi­sions in the tax-ex­tenders pack­age be­ne­fit con­stitu­ents in some way. Thune also said that mem­bers view ex­tend­ing cur­rent tax policy dif­fer­ently than they do en­act­ing new en­ergy le­gis­la­tion.

“I just think you’re talk­ing about tax policy,” Thune said. “You’re talk­ing about ex­tend­ing tax policy. And many of them are things that our mem­bers are sup­port­ive of.”

Of course, there are some pro­vi­sions in the bill that Re­pub­lic­ans op­pose. “So it’s hard to say at this point how that vote might go,” Thune said. “But I wouldn’t ne­ces­sar­ily guar­an­tee that it’s gonna turn out the same way that the en­ergy [ef­fi­ciency] clo­ture vote did.”

GOP Sen. Tim Scott of South Car­o­lina said that wheth­er he votes for the un­der­ly­ing meas­ure de­pends on wheth­er Re­id al­lows amend­ments, but that he ex­pects there is enough sup­port in the con­fer­ence for the meas­ure to clear pro­ced­ur­al hurdles.

“What they’ve said is there’s so much stuff in there that is ne­ces­sary to move our eco­nomy for­ward that per­haps this isn’t the time to make a philo­soph­ic­al or pro­cess stand,” Scott said.

At the same time, con­ser­vat­ive groups are mak­ing the case that this is pre­cisely the time to take a stand against ex­tend­ing the tax pro­vi­sions. Her­it­age Ac­tion, the Club for Growth, and Freedom­Works have each come out against the Ex­pire Act, as the le­gis­la­tion is known.

The prob­lem, some con­ser­vat­ives ar­gue, is that the tax ex­tenders be­ne­fit spe­cial in­terests, rather than the tax­pay­ing pub­lic over­all.

“That ap­proach to le­gis­lat­ing is how our tax code be­came so con­vo­luted in the first place,” Her­it­age Ac­tion spokes­man Dan Holler said in a state­ment. “Com­pre­hens­ive, pro-growth tax re­form will re­main elu­sive un­til it be­comes clear to spe­cial in­terests their favored pro­vi­sions are no longer sac­rosanct.”

But Re­pub­lic­ans who sound sup­port­ive of let­ting the le­gis­la­tion move for­ward aren’t fazed by the con­ser­vat­ive head­winds.

“Dif­fer­ent or­gan­iz­a­tions are go­ing to come to dif­fer­ent con­clu­sions,” Thune said. “You’re gonna have an aw­ful lot of sup­port from the busi­ness com­munity.”

In­deed, there are con­ser­vat­ive groups back­ing the le­gis­la­tion. Amer­ic­ans for Tax Re­form, the group headed by Grover Nor­quist, and the U.S. Cham­ber of Com­merce are among them. They want to see the ex­tenders fol­ded in­to a broad­er over­haul of the tax code, but ar­gue they help busi­nesses and fam­il­ies in the mean­time.

“For now, though, the man­date for the Sen­ate is clear: Do no harm,” Amer­ic­ans for Tax Re­form said in a state­ment.

Even if the meas­ure gets through the Sen­ate, it will stall in the House, which is con­sid­er­ing the pro­vi­sions dis­cretely, rather than in a single pack­age.

Ac­tion on the bill isn’t ex­pec­ted to wrap up un­til next week, aides said, and in the mean­time Re­pub­lic­ans have not ceased call­ing for amend­ments, with lead­ers say­ing they ex­pect a re­peal of the med­ic­al-device tax will be offered.

Thune has in­tro­duced eight amend­ments, in­clud­ing sev­er­al Obama­care meas­ures and one that would make the state and loc­al sales-tax de­duc­tion per­man­ent. In ad­di­tion, Re­pub­lic­an Sens. Jeff Flake of Ari­zona and Lamar Al­ex­an­der of Ten­ness­ee said they plan to jointly of­fer an amend­ment to re­peal the wind-en­ergy tax cred­it.

Even so, Re­pub­lic­ans are already ex­pect­ing Re­id to re­buff their ef­forts to amend the le­gis­la­tion.

Sen. Jeff Ses­sions of Alabama said he hasn’t de­cided wheth­er he’ll vote against pro­ced­ur­al meas­ures if Re­pub­lic­ans are not al­lowed amend­ments, but he poin­ted out that do­ing so has been the norm for him.

“This is so con­trary to the her­it­age of the Sen­ate, no mat­ter what the is­sue is be­fore us,” Ses­sions said. “We’ve got to end this.”

What We're Following See More »
AT HEART OF FEDERAL RACKETEERING LAWSUIT
A.T.F. Agents Filled Secret Coffers
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Agents for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives " used a web of shadowy cigarette sales to funnel tens of millions of dollars into a secret bank account," according to a federal racketeering lawsuit filed by a group of tobacco farmers who claim they were "swindled out of $24 million." The agents allegedly used shipments of snack food disguised as tobacco. The Justice Department is reportedly investigating the matter, though as of now it is unclear how widespread the practice was or if it is still ongoing.

Source:
THE QUESTION
How Many Signatures Has the Petition for Trump’s Tax Returns Received?
1 hours ago
THE ANSWER

More than 1 million, setting a record. More than 100,000 signatures triggers an official White House response.

Source:
TIED TO RUSSIA INVESTIGATION
Sen. Collins Open to Subpoena of Trump’s Tax Returns
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

Sen. Susan Collins, who sits on the Intelligence Committee, "said on Wednesday she's open to using a subpoena to investigate President Donald Trump's tax returns for potential connections to Russia." She said the committee is also open to subpoenaing Trump himself. "This is a counter-intelligence operation in many ways," she said of Russia's interference. "That's what our committee specializes in. We are used to probing in depth in this area."

Source:
NPR ALSO LAUNCHES ETHICS WATCH
Obama Staffers Launch Group to Monitor Trump Ethics
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

"Top lawyers who helped the Obama White House craft and hold to rules of conduct believe President Donald Trump and his staff will break ethics norms meant to guard against politicization of the government — and they’ve formed a new group to prepare, and fight. United to Protect Democracy, which draws its name from a line in President Barack Obama’s farewell address that urged his supporters to pick up where he was leaving off, has already raised a $1.5 million operating budget, hired five staffers and has plans to double that in the coming months." Meanwhile, NPR has launched a "Trump Ethics Monitor" to track the resolution of ten ethics-related promises that the president has made.

Source:
DOESN’T WISH TO JOIN TRUMP
Christie Turned Down Labor Secretary
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Over a meatloaf lunch at the White House last week, Donald Trump offered the job of Labor secretary to New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, a longtime loyalist. Christie promptly turned down the offer, once again signaling that he has no desire to move to Washington, D.C. to join the Trump administration. The job ended up going to Alexander Acosta, who is expected to sail through the Senate confirmation process.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login