Nuke Agency Rejects Mandate to Provide Cost-Savings Details

A recently renovated centrifuge used in nuclear weapon assessments at Sandia National Laboratories. The Energy Department branch overseeing the lab is rejecting a finding by congressional auditors that it should know how much money could be saved by enacting certain efficiency projects.
National Journal
Rachel Oswald
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Rachel Oswald
May 16, 2014, 10:48 a.m.

The U.S. nuc­le­ar weapons agency is re­ject­ing a find­ing by aud­it­ors that it should know how much money it could save by pur­su­ing cer­tain ef­fi­cien­cies.

The Na­tion­al Nuc­le­ar Se­cur­ity Ad­min­is­tra­tion was re­quired un­der the fisc­al 2012 de­fense au­thor­iz­a­tion law to is­sue a re­port to Cap­it­ol Hill ex­amin­ing areas with­in its en­ter­prise where it could op­er­ate more ef­fi­ciently and save money by do­ing so. A Thursday re­port by the Gov­ern­ment Ac­count­ab­il­ity Of­fice found that while the agency’s as­sess­ment — even­tu­ally de­livered to law­makers in Novem­ber 2013 — did high­light sev­en “op­por­tun­it­ies for ef­fi­ciency,” it failed to provide es­tim­ates on the cost sav­ings that could be real­ized with those pro­jects.

The semi­autonom­ous En­ergy De­part­ment branch, in its com­ments to aud­it­ors, dis­puted the find­ing that it was re­quired un­der the 2012 le­gis­la­tion to “cas­u­ally and quant­it­at­ively link its cost ef­fi­ciency ini­ti­at­ives to spe­cif­ic cost sav­ings.”

Ac­cord­ing to the 25-page audit re­port, the Na­tion­al Nuc­le­ar Se­cur­ity Ad­min­is­tra­tion had ar­gued it lacked “re­li­able in­form­a­tion to ac­cur­ately de­vel­op cost es­tim­ates” for the ini­ti­at­ives it out­lined to Con­gress.

The aud­it­ors dis­agreed with this con­ten­tion, not­ing that, while ana­lyt­ic­ally dif­fi­cult to de­vel­op, a “sound meth­od­o­logy for es­tim­ated sav­ings helps en­sure that pro­posed sav­ings can be achieved.”

The nuc­le­ar agency’s spend­ing de­cisions are cur­rently un­der the mi­cro­scope in light of a broad­er con­gres­sion­al at­mo­sphere of budget-tight­en­ing and, more spe­cific­ally, be­cause NNSA of­fi­cials in re­cent years have over­seen a num­ber of pro­jects that have far ex­ceeded ini­tial cost pro­jec­tions.

One of the ef­fi­ciency pro­jects the agency out­lined in its re­port to Con­gress was the planned Urani­um Con­ver­sion Fa­cil­ity at the Y-12 Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Com­plex in Ten­ness­ee. That ini­ti­at­ive today is in jeop­ardy due in part to how much its es­tim­ated price tag has ris­en, skyrock­et­ing from ini­tial pro­jec­tions of no more than $1.1 bil­lion to al­most $20 bil­lion.

What We're Following See More »
HOSTAGE SITUATION
Multiple Deaths, Injuries from Van Attack in Barcelona
57 minutes ago
THE DETAILS
SAYS TRUMP JUST ATTACKING REPUBLICANS
Former Top Aide to McConnell Says GOPers Should Abandon Trump
58 minutes ago
THE LATEST
“PUBLICITY SEEKING”
Trump Blasts Graham, Flake on Twitter
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

As part of a twitter rant on Thursday morning, President Trump singled out Republican Sens. Jeff Flake and Lindsey Graham for criticism. He said Flake is "WEAK on borders, crime and a non-factor in Senate. He's toxic!" Trump also named Flake's primary challenger, Kelli Ward. He said Graham's contention that Trump suggested a moral equivalence between the neo-Nazis in Charlottesville and the counter-protesters is a "disgusting lie."

Source:
“YOU CAN’T CHANGE HISTORY, BUT YOU CAN LEARN FROM IT”
Trump Defends Confederate Statues in Tweetstorm
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
CEOS HAVE BEEN FLEEING FOR THE EXITS
Trump to End Business Councils
1 days ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login