Does Hillary Owe It to Democrats to Run?

Karl Rove’s attacks on Clinton’s health divert attention from what promises to be a fascinating election, no matter who decides to enter the fray.

Karl Rove, former Deputy Chief of Staff and Senior Policy Advisor to U.S. President George W. Bush, prepares to lead a panel discussion at The 4% Project Conference on April 12, 2011 at Southern Methodist University in Dallas, Texas. The economic conference, sponsored by the George W. Bush Presidential Center, intends to increase awareness of public policies and private business strategies that increase opportunity and prosperity for Americans. 
National Journal
Charlie Cook
Add to Briefcase
Charlie Cook
May 19, 2014, 5:09 p.m.

Some people in­volved in polit­ics evoke the strongest of emo­tions. Surely, Hil­lary Clin­ton is one of those people. In the cat­egory of those who have nev­er sought elect­ive of­fice them­selves, Karl Rove would cer­tainly be on the list as well. Their lines in­ter­sec­ted a week ago with a New York Post re­port that at a con­fer­ence, Rove made ref­er­ence to the much-pub­li­cized fall and head in­jury that the then-sec­ret­ary of State ex­per­i­enced dur­ing her fi­nal months in that post. This in­cid­ent res­ul­ted in a three-day hos­pit­al­iz­a­tion, dur­ing which Clin­ton was un­der ob­ser­va­tion. Rove re­portedly asked, “Thirty days in the hos­pit­al?” con­tinu­ing, “And when she re­appears, she’s wear­ing glasses that are only for people who have had trau­mat­ic brain in­jury? We need to know what’s up with that.” This set off a firestorm of news stor­ies sug­gest­ing that Rove was im­ply­ing Clin­ton had suffered some kind of per­man­ent brain dam­age as a res­ult of her fall. Rove cla­ri­fied his re­marks this past week­end on Fox News Sunday. “I’m not ques­tion­ing her health,” he said. “What I’m ques­tion­ing is wheth­er or not it’s a done deal that she’s run­ning. And she would not be hu­man if she did not take this in­to con­sid­er­a­tion.”

If Rove was only mak­ing the point that Clin­ton — who will turn 69 two weeks be­fore the 2016 gen­er­al elec­tion — might not run, there were cer­tainly less in­flam­mat­ory ways of rais­ing that is­sue. I sus­pect that Rove knew pre­cisely what he was say­ing and that he wanted to get that dis­cus­sion go­ing with a rhet­or­ic­al “high and in­side” pitch, the kind we see too much of in Amer­ic­an polit­ics. But to his second, cla­ri­fied point, this column has noted that while Clin­ton’s age will be pre­cisely the same as Ron­ald Re­agan’s when he was first elec­ted pres­id­ent, people in their late 60s do not make nine-year com­mit­ments lightly. In my pre­vi­ous piece, I was not ar­guing that she wouldn’t run (in fact, I stated that there was per­haps a 70 per­cent chance that she would), but rather that there was a chance she might not feel up to it. People quite close to Clin­ton have sug­ges­ted that she may simply de­cide not to run; some news re­ports have said that oth­ers in her circle would rather she didn’t.

Nobody has to ex­plain to Hil­lary Clin­ton how ar­du­ous run­ning for pres­id­ent is; she has seen it up close and per­son­al. She un­der­stands the de­mands and will either feel ready, will­ing, and able to run, or she’ll de­cide she would like to slow down and have a life, en­joy be­ing a grand­moth­er and spend­ing time out­side the grind of polit­ic­al life. If her heart is in it, she should run; if her heart isn’t in it, run­ning would be a hor­rible mis­take.

The ques­tion of wheth­er Clin­ton runs cer­tainly evokes strong emo­tions in many people. At a din­ner re­cently, a friend — one with clear Demo­crat­ic sym­path­ies — ar­gued to me that if Clin­ton de­clined to run for pres­id­ent in 2016, the Demo­crat­ic Party would have a right to feel angry with her, sug­gest­ing that she had an ob­lig­a­tion to run. My view is some­what dif­fer­ent: She is her own hu­man be­ing, she has the right to make her own ca­reer choices, and if she de­cides not to run, the Demo­crat­ic Party should simply thank her for past ser­vice and move on and find someone else. Clin­ton doesn’t owe any­thing to any­one else in this situ­ation, oth­er than mak­ing the right de­cision for her­self. Oth­er Demo­crats simply feel that as someone who ob­vi­ously is among the most am­bi­tious around, she would be simply in­cap­able of de­cid­ing not to run.

Each side has strong views: Some Re­pub­lic­ans fear she could be un­beat­able, while some on the Demo­crat­ic side have a fear of the un­known. If Clin­ton de­cides not to enter the con­test, the Demo­crat­ic nom­in­a­tion would prob­ably re­semble a Cecil B. De­Mille pro­duc­tion, with a cast of thou­sands, in which no one would have any idea who would emerge as the party’s stand­ard-bear­er. For some reas­on, that seems really scary to some Demo­crats. Per­son­ally, I think that wheth­er Clin­ton runs or not, 2016 will be a very ex­cit­ing — prob­ably fas­cin­at­ing — race. The next pres­id­en­tial con­test is just a very dif­fer­ent race with her versus without her; the lat­ter scen­ario would most likely res­ult in the bat­on be­ing passed to a very dif­fer­ent polit­ic­al gen­er­a­tion. How could that not be ex­cit­ing?

The ques­tion of wheth­er Jeb Bush runs on the GOP side isn’t the same at all, even though he cer­tainly rep­res­ents a link to the past. The known and the­or­et­ic­al al­tern­at­ives—save Mike Hucka­bee, Rick Perry, and Rick San­tor­um—would be that of new gen­er­a­tion, re­l­at­ively new polit­ic­al faces, more of the fu­ture. Should Bush run, he would likely set up a battle for the heart and soul of the GOP. The fact that cur­rent polls show him roughly tied with Hucka­bee and Sen. Rand Paul un­der­scores how much the Re­pub­lic­an Party has changed. Jeb Bush would rep­res­ent the old Re­pub­lic­an Party, the lin­ear des­cend­ent of Pres­id­ents Eis­en­hower, Nix­on, Ford, George H.W. Bush, and George W. Bush (I am avoid­ing Pres­id­ent Re­agan, but that could be ar­gued either way), along with Bob Dole. Most of the al­tern­at­ives to Bush are vari­ations on the new theme of the GOP, far less con­ven­tion­al choices, al­though ar­gu­ably some of the gov­ernors who are look­ing at run­ning could le­git­im­ately fall in­to either cat­egory.

We should re­con­cile ourselves to an­oth­er two years of back-and-forth gren­ade-lob­bing, over­shad­ow­ing at times what is likely to be a really in­ter­est­ing cam­paign that can still go in a thou­sand dif­fer­ent dir­ec­tions.

What We're Following See More »
CNN/ORC Has Clinton Up 5 Points
12 hours ago

Hillary Clinton leads Donald Trump 49%-44% in a new CNN/ORC poll out Monday afternoon. But it's Gary Johnson's performance, or lack thereof, that's the real story. Johnson, who had cleared 10% in some surveys earlier this fall, as he made a bid to qualify for the debates, is down to 3% support. He must hit 5% nationwide for the Libertarian Party to qualify for some federal matching funds in future elections.

McCarthy, Pelosi Team Up on National Guard Bonuses
14 hours ago

The majority and minority leader of the House are both saying "California's veterans are not to blame for being mistakenly overpaid, after a Los Angeles Times story revealed that officials are trying to claw back millions in bonuses from California National Guardsmen. House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy called the efforts to recoup the money 'disgraceful,' and asked for the Department of Defense to waive the repayments soldiers would be forced to make if they inappropriately received re-enlistment bonuses for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan." Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said she's looking for a "legislative fix" in the lame-duck session.

IBD/TIPP Poll Shows a Dead Heat
17 hours ago

A new Investor’s Business Daily/TechnoMetrica Market Intelligence poll shows Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump each earning 41% support. On the one hand, the poll has been skewing in Trump's favor this year, relative to other polls. But on the other, data guru Nate Silver called the IBD/TIPP poll the most accurate in 2012.

Clinton Leads by 12 in ABC Tracking Poll
22 hours ago

Hillary Clinton leads Donald Trump by 12 percentage points among likely voters, 50 to 38 percent, in a new ABC News tracking poll, "her highest support and his lowest to date in ABC News and ABC News/Washington Post polls. Gary Johnson has 5 percent support, Jill Stein 2 percent. Clinton led by only four points in the last ABC/Post poll on Oct. 13.

Morning Consult Poll: Clinton Decisively Won Debate
3 days ago

"According to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll, the first national post-debate survey, 43 percent of registered voters said the Democratic candidate won, compared with 26 percent who opted for the Republican Party’s standard bearer. Her 6-point lead over Trump among likely voters is unchanged from our previous survey: Clinton still leads Trump 42 percent to 36 percent in the race for the White House, with Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson taking 9 percent of the vote."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.