Robert Menendez is making things easier for Democrats stuck between showing support for Israel and backing the Obama administration’s negotiations with Iran.
On Monday, the Democratic chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee removed a pro-Israel bill from the committee’s agenda, Foreign Policy‘s John Hudson reports, after a proposed amendment threatened to split Democrats’ allegiances.
The bill, called the U.S.-Israel Strategic Partnership Act, would strengthen ties between the two countries in a number of arenas, including military, trade, intelligence, and energy. But an amendment from the committee’s top Republican, Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., gave Menendez pause. Corker’s amendment would force President Obama to present any nuclear deal with Iran to Congress within three days of its signature, a situation the White House is trying to avoid. Congress could hold a “vote of disapproval” and conduct hearings on the nuclear deal, but its opinion would carry no legally binding weight.
This is not the first time lawmakers have attempted to attach Iran sanctions to a bill at the last minute. A tougher version of the Corker amendment, which would have required Obama to prove Iran’s compliance with the nuclear deal in order to stave off a reapplication of economic sanctions, was bundled with a defense bill in December. It died soon after, thanks to pressure from the White House. In February, Senate Republicans tried unsuccessfully to add Iran sanctions to a bill about veterans’ benefits.
Here, the Corker amendment’s attempt to link the Israel issue with Iranian nuclear negotiations could be seen as a ploy to divide Democrats in the run-up to midterm elections, forcing them to choose between supporting Israel or the administration. On the other hand, some see no daylight between the two issues, arguing that a pro-Israel stance must include support for sanctions on Iran.
What We're Following See More »
"Despite pressure from the White House, House GOP leaders determined Thursday night that they didn’t have the votes to pass a rewrite of the Affordable Care Act and would not seek to put their proposal on the floor on Friday. A late push to act on health care had threatened the bipartisan deal to keep the government open for one week while lawmakers crafted a longer-term spending deal. Now, members are likely to approve the short-term spending bill when it comes to the floor and keep the government open past midnight on Friday."
President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."
Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.
Members of Congress are eyeing a one-week spending bill which would keep the government open past the Friday night deadline, giving lawmakers an extra week to iron out a long-term deal to fund the government. Without any action, the government would run out of funding starting at midnight Saturday. “I am optimistic that a final funding package will be completed soon," said Rep. Rodney Frelinghuysen, R-N.J., chairman of the House Appropriations Committee.